Free Essay

The Struggle for Power Contenders

In:

Submitted By hbrown122
Words 1808
Pages 8
The Struggle for Power: Key Players
Joseph Stalin
Background
* Born into a family of Georgian peasants in Gori in 1879 * Educated in a local religious school because his parents wanted him to become a priest. * Continued his spiritual education in Tbilisi upon leaving the seminary and converted to Marxism * Joined the Communist Party in 1902, and in 1912 he was made a member of the Central Committee. * Throughout this time, he was continually in trouble with the police, and was eventually exiled to Siberia, from which he escaped 5 times.
Position(s)
* General Secretary * Controlled the Politburo agenda * Selected delegates for the Party Congresss * Controlled promotions and appointments within the party. * Head of Rabkrin * Controlled party discipline

Revolutionary Record * Was a committee member during the October Revolution and the years that followed * Saw himself as a military tactician and refused to accept Trotsky’s authrotiy during the Civil War. * Never distinguished himself as a revolutionary hero during this period, but in spite of this, by 1921, his presence on many senior committees secured him a position at the highest level of government.
Relationship with Lenin * First meeting occurred in 1905. * In the period prior to the Oct. Rev, Lenin came to rely on Stalin’s administration ability and loyalty. * Prior to Lenin’s illness, Stalin was careful to back him on controversial issues. * Once Lenin became ill Stalin began to oppose him. * Lenin was highly critical of Stalin in his Testament, particually following a disagreement between Stalin and Lenin’s wife. * Lenin expressed concern that Stalin had concentrated an enourmous power in his hand, and did not always use it wisely. As a result, he demanded that the other senior members of the party think about a way of removing Stalin and finding someone more tolerant, loyal, polite and considerate to the comrades and less capricious to take his place. * Lenin’s disapproval of Stalin is also evident in his last essay Better Fewer, But Better which was highly critical of the Workers’ and Peasants’ Inspectorate, of which Stalin was the Head. * However, he also recognised that, along with Trotsky, he was one of the most able figures of the Central Committee.
Appeal within the party * Appeal was threefold. * He had the power to advance the careers of those within the Communist Party machine as a result of his many bureaucratic positions. * Unlike Bukharin and Trotksy he appeared to be the voice fo calm moderation. * He was prepared to appeal to the national pride of those he sought to lead.
Significance
* He could influence what was discussed at Politburo meetings * He could fill the Party Congress with his supporters * He had the power to reward those who were loyal to him.

Leon Trotsky (who thinks you’re hotsky)
Background
* Born in 1979 to a relatively well-off Jewish family of independent farmers * At the turn of the century, he joined a revolutionary group, but was soon exiled to Siberia because of his political radicalism. * In 1902, following a daring escape, he joined Lenin and other Marxists in London.
Position(s)
* Head of the Red Army
Revolutionary Record * Reputation as a revolutionary was established in the 1905 Revolution. * He was a leading figure in the short-lived St. Petersburg Soviet of November 1905 which organised a general strike amongst the St Petersburg workers. * In 1917 his reputation won support for the Communists during the crucial period in which the October Revolution was planned. * Trotsky masterminded the Communist seizure of power and was subsequently responsible for consolidating Communist rule, through his leadership and restructuring the Red Army during the Civil War of 1918-1921.
Relationship with Lenin * Early relationship was turbulent and in 1903 he sides with the Mensheviks, rejecting Lenin’s belief in a disciplined, secretive, professional political party. These struggles continued until 1917. * When he returned to Russia in 1917, he joined the Communists and was able to work closely with Lenin. * Throughout the Civil War, Lenin and Trotsky also saw eye-to-eye over the controversial issue of restoring discipline to the Red Army. * In government, Trotsky acted as Lenin’s principal lieutenant and Lenin was happy to proclaim that there was no better Communist. * Lenin singled Trotsky out as the most able man in the present Central committee in his Testament * However, he also noted Trotsky’s “far too reaching self-confidence”, a character trait that others saw as arrogance.
Appeal within the Party * Trotsky’s revolutionary heroism in 1905, 1917 and during the Civil War won him the support of many young Communists and students as well as the loyalty of the Red Army. * However, he was not a typical Communist and therefore he had many enemies within the Party. * Trotsky’s time in exile had made him one of the most “western” of the Party leadership and was also the most urban. * In a country that was predominantly rural and was increasingly proud of its national identity this alienated Trotsky from many within the Party. * Finally, many of the party resented the way in which Trotsky had Lenin’s trust as well as important positions within the government, despite joining the party late.
Significance
* He was seen as a threat because Party members thought he might use the army to seize power. * He gained the loyalty of members of the army, some of whom we also members of the party. * However, many members of the army were not members of the party, and therefore could not attend the party congress.

Bukharin
Background
* Born in 1888, Bukharin was the youngest of Lenin’s potential heirs. * His parents were teachers, and he joined the Communists in 1906, organising a strike in a boot factory in the same year. * Having been arrested and imprisoned for revolutionary activity many times, he escaped from Russia in 1910 and met Lenin in exile 2 years later.
Position(s)
* Head of the Media * Editor of Pravda
Revolutionary Record * One of the leading lights in the Moscow Communist Party during 1917, and following the October Revolution, his radicalism inspired his compatriots to seize power in Moscow. * During the Civil War, Bukharin’s revolutionary zeal was evident in his publications for Pravda and his work encouraging German communists to rise up and seize power in their own country.
Relationship with Lenin * Admired Lenin – in 1916, he wrote to Lenin, “I have the greatest respect for you and look on you as my revolutionary teacher and love you”. * Lenin in return referred to Bukharin as the “golden boy” of the Communist Party. * Often at ideological loggerheads. * Following the Rev, Bukharin headed the first Communist opposition group, who criticised Lenin’s policy of peace with Germany. * At the end of the Civil War, Bukharin abandoned his early radicalism and embraced Lenin’s New Economic Policy. * In his Testament, Lenin recognised that Bukharin was “favourite of the whole Party” and also stated that he was the most able force amongst the youngest of the party. * However Lenin had serious reservations about Bukharin’s skills as a theorist, stating that his theoretical views can only with the very greatest doubt be viewed as fully Marxist. This criticism was highly significant because the Communist party believed passionately tht the correct throery was essential if they were to change the world.
Appeal within the party * Lenin famously remarked that Bukharin was the favourite of the whole party. His appeal was such that in 1921 a foreign visitor to Moscow claimed that Bukharin was “named in Russia as the eventual successor to Lenin”. * Bukharin’s reputation for “honesty, fairness and incorruptibility” no doubt explain this attraction.
Significance
* He could publish his own views and criticise those of others.
Zinoviev
Background * Born in 1883 and was the son of a Jewish dairy farmer * Home schooled and as a result was the least educated of the Communist leaders. * Joined the communists in 1903 and following his arrest in 1907 for revolutionary activities, he was exiled to Switzerland, where he became Lenin’s latest collaborator.
Position(s)
* Head of the Petrograd Party
Revolutionary Record * Short on revolutionary heroism. * In October 1917, he opposed the planned coup. * During the Civil War he remained in Petrograd’s most luxurious hotel, far away from the fighting.
Relationship with Lenin * Worked with Lenin on a number of books and pamphlets, and returned to Russia with him in April 1917. * Friendship was evident fromt eh fact that Zinoviev then accompanied Lenin into hiding in mid-17. * Their relationship was so close that Trotsky claimed that Zinoviev even adopted his own handwriting. * Following their return to Russia, they disagreed on two crucial issues. * He argued against the imminent Communist seizure of power. * Following the seizure of power, he suggested that the Communists should share power with other socialist parties. * In spite of this, once he dropped his opposition, Zinoviev returned to his position as one of Lenin’s most loyal henchmen. * It was Zinoviev’s disloyalty and lack of vision that Lenin remembered in his testament – “I will only remind you that the October episode of Zinoviev and Kamenev was not, of course, accidental”
Appeal within the party * Least appealing of the contenders. * Was a good speaker when the crowd was with him * His vanity, naked ambition and obvious political failings led many in the party to express their open contempt for hom.
Significance
* Had the loyalty of a large section of the party.
Kamenev
Background * Born in 1883 and was the only potential party leader who had a working-class background. * Revolutionary career began in 1900 when he was expelled from school for subversive activity. He was arrested and exiled in 1902 and quickly joined Lenin in Paris. * He returned to Russia to work for the Communists amongst the working class and was exiled twice more, finally joining Stalin in exile in Siberia. * Kamenev’s first wife was Trotsky’s sister.
Position(s)
* Head of the Moscow party
Revolutionary Record * Better known for caution than for revolutionary passion. * Following his return to Petrograd in March 1917, he disagreed with Lenin on several issues of strategy, opposing the April Theses, the October Revolution and the creation of an all-Communist government. * In addition, he played no notable part in the civil war.
Relationship with Lenin * Kamenev was Lenin’s closest friend and collaboration prior to 1917 after Zinoviev. * However during ’17 he was one of the most senior Communists to oppose the central thrust of Lenin’s vision. * Following the revolution, Kamenev was reconciled with lenin and they remained close during Lenin’s final years. * In his testament, Lenin bracketed Kamenev and Zinoviev, reminding his readers of their disloyalty in the crucial months of 1917.
Appeal within the party * Had little personal ambition and therefore saw no need to consolidate his support base. * In contrast to Zinoviev, he was something of an intellectual, but an uninspiring public speaker. * He had a reputation for compromise and for giving up easily in the face of opposition.
Significance
* Had the loyalty of a large section of the party.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Stalin’s Ability to Manipulate the Party Machine Was the Key to His Success in the Leadership Struggle?

...How far do you agree that Stalin’s ability to manipulate the party machine was the key to his success in the leadership struggle? Following Lenin’s death in 1924, the Communist party and their leadership over Russia was set into disarray. Many different ideals and views about the future of Socialism were unveiled and adapted over and through this ideological confusion; with various contenders for the party leader emerged. Throughout 1924-1929, in which a turbulent period of struggle occurred in the power vacuum post-lenin. Stalin eventually emerged as the successful new leader of the USSR. Stalin’s position as General Secretary of the party, among other factors His ability to manipulate the party machine through his position as General Secretary would eventually enable him to become the leader. Stalin’s position of General Secretary allowed him to use and abuse Lenin’s systems to get to the top. Stalin had the power to control what was discussed and how politburo decisions were to be carried out, and he had the significant influence of patronage. This allowed him to access every strand of the Communist party – the orgburo, politburo, and secretariat. His power of patronage allowed him to use his authority to place his most reliable supporters in key and enviable positions within the party. As a result, these people were extremely loyal to Stalin since they effectively owed their place to him, and so therefore he could count on their support. These appointed people became...

Words: 1411 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Far Do You Agree That Stalin’s Position as General Secretary Was the Main Factor in His Emergence as Leader of Russia?

...How far do you agree that Stalin’s position as General Secretary was the main factor in his emergence as leader of Russia? After Lenin’s death in 1924, the Communist leadership of Russia was thrown into disarray. There were many different ideas for the future of the country, the strongest of which was socialism, which caused many various contenders for the party to emerge. There was a struggle of power between these contenders, but Stalin eventually emerged as the successful new leader of the USSR. Stalin’s position as General Secretary was the main factor in this emergence as leader. Stalin’s position of General Secretary allowed him to use and abuse Lenin’s systems to get to the top. Stalin had the power to control what was discussed and how politburo decisions were carried out, and he also had the significant influence of patronage. This allowed him to access most of the Communist party, his power of patronage allowed him to use his authority to place his most reliable supporters in key positions within the party. As a result, there people were extremely loyal to Stalin as they owed their place to him, and therefore he could count on their support. These people became known as his delegates as they could also be known to vote in Stalin’s favour. Stalin also had other key positions in the party, which allowed him to outmanoeuvre his rivals through a series of alliances. He was head of the Sovnarkom, which allowed him to expel any party members who disagreed with his views...

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Powerbase

...PERSONALITES AND POWERBASE Lenin’s death created a power vacuum at the top of soviet politics. Whilst leading figures replaced him in various official capacties, no leader could replace his supremacy over party and government. This was the central problem facing the soviet communist party. There were five contenders for the rule of Russia. Stalin Members of the Soviet government called Stalin ‘the grey blur’, meaning that there was nothing outstanding or controversial about him. He had played a minor role in the October Revolution and in the Russian Civil War. However, his real gift was for administration, and due to his peasant upbringing he understood the way that many ordinary Russians thought and acted. He also had a reputation for loyalty to Lenin. Nonetheless, when Lenin became ill, Stalin started disobeying his orders. Lenin’s Testament criticised him for this, but, as the Testament was kept secret, Lenin’s final instruction that Stalin should be sacked from his position within the Party was not widely known. Trotsky Trotsky was the most heroic of the contenders. Together with Lenin, he had planned and led the October Revolution and had commanded the Red Army during the Civil War. He was extremely glamorous, and a gifted theorist and orator, who inspired the loyalty of his troops. Trotsky had a radical vision for the future of Russia, which appealed to young and idealistic members of the Party. Indeed, Lenin’s Testament praised Trotsky as ‘the most outstanding...

Words: 715 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

“Stalin’s Position as General Secretary Explains His Success in Defeating His Rivals in the Years 1924-1929”

...important factor in his seize of power. Stalin's position as General Secretary was very important as it gave him control over the whole party machine. But there were also other factors that proved to be very important. This essay will attempt to assess the relative importance these factors. Stalin's position as General Secretary proved to be very important in his seize of power for many reasons. One reason for this is that it gave him the ability to control party membership which was extremely beneficial as it meant he could bring people that supported him into the party and also he could kick out those who did not agree with his ideology. Another reason is that it allowed him to undermine his rivals’ power bases meaning he could sway the opinions of others into supporting him over the other competitors in the running for power. However, there were many other factors that contributed to Stalin's seize of power. One example of this is that the Bolsheviks made many errors, both general and individual. An example of a general error is the underestimation of Stalin. This was beneficial as it allowed Stalin to make moves without anyone suspecting him of doing anything particularly damaging to their success. Another example is the failure to publish Lenin's testament. This was a mistake as the opinions Lenin voiced about Stalin's inabilities were the last real opportunity to stop Stalin. There were also individual errors that all the contenders made that benefitted Stalin. Trotsky...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Analytical Difference in Conceptualising the Russia-Ukraine Crises in Realist and Materialist Terms

... Kholmati Kholik Global Political Economy Global Political Economy 33423968 33420343 kadfrimpong@yahoo.com kkholik@gmail.com 15/03/2016 Abstract The so called Euromaidan revolution – Ukraine’s struggle to move one step further to closer ties with Europe by liberating itself from the Russian orbit, have created the Russia-Ukraine Crisis. It has re-established and heightened the tensions between Russia and West. Realism has been on the fore front of the academic discussion in explaining the crisis as the power competition between Russia and the West. Alternatively, Materialism has provided a different yet deeper analytical perspective on the conflict by attributing it to the broadening of the transnational class capitalism. This paper will seek to explain and scrutinize the analytical differences in conceptualizing this crisis in Realist and Materialist terms. Keywords: Ukraine crisis, Realism, Security, Materialism, Lockean heartland, Contender states Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Theoretical framework 5 2.1 Theoretical underpinnings of the Realist school of thought 5 2.2 Theoretical underpinnings of Materialism: Amsterdam School Approach 7 2.2.1 The Lockean Heartland 8 2.2.2 Contender States 9 2.2.3 Ex-contender states, aspirant states, and capitalist class fraction 10 3 The Russia-Ukraine conflict 12 3.1 Russia-Ukraine conflict in Realist terms 12 3.1.1 NATO expansion 13 3.1.2 European Union (EU) expansion eastward...

Words: 9639 - Pages: 39

Premium Essay

Explain Why There Was No Successor to Lenin

...Explain why there was no successor to Lenin in 1924? (12 marks) Lenin's concerns over who was to replace him were largely due to ego, he thought that noone was capable of seeing Russia's problems, or the "correct" Marxist solution as clearly as he could. Lenin's ego was the main reason why no one candidate emerged whilst he was alive. He was concerned about all the the prospective candidates, seeing such flaws in their characters that he thought none of them were suitable for the position. He outlined all of his concerns in his testament. In many ways he was right, Bolshevism was, in reality, Lenin's project, anyone who disagreed with him was either thrown out of the party, branded a Menshevik, or worse. ! Lenin's stroke in 1922, the senior Bolsheviks could not agree on an individual who had After the intellectual and moral authority to replace Lenin, so they compromised, and picked three leaders - Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev to rule until he either got better or died. This was made official once Lenin died. ! arguments with fMarxists went back to his early days in exile, when he disagreed with His the founders of the Russia Social Democratic Labour Party Georgi Plekhanov and Pavel Aksel'rod, this disagreement led him to form his own faction of people who followed his ideas - the Bolsheviks. ! and policy were divided among party members at all levels.The issue was the Ideology survival of the Revolution and thus,by extension,the party itself.Trotsky...

Words: 716 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Poopie

...much more than a chapter in a book. It represents much more than a boxing victory. During the 1930’s, people of ethnic groups, especially Blacks, were not worth much. When Angelou stated, “Champion of the world. A Black boy. Some Black mother’s son.” (Paragraph 27), this defined struggle. This battle against the White Contender was not your ordinary victory. The victory would exemplify the Blacks, not only defeating a White man and it being okay, but also would portray an aspect of Blacks defeating the system. For once in their lives, it gave African Americans a sense of empowerment. This was their first step of defense, where no repercussions would be taken in exchange for victory. This essay is an example of a student's work Disclaimer This essay has been submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Essay Writing Service Essay Marking Service Example Essays Who wrote this essay Become a Freelance Writer Place an Order “If Joe lost we were back in slavery and beyond help. “ “My race groaned. It was our people falling”. (Paragraphs 16 and 17).[Reference?] These two quotes represent struggle and years of pain. They knew what it was like to experience violence first hand. It was not a myth nor story they heard about, they felt the pain on a daily basis. Not only would this defeat be a lost for Louis, but it would represent defeat to the entire Black culture. If this...

Words: 1619 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Pfizer Ethics

...Pfizer: Ethics and Leadership The selection process used by Pfizer to find a successor to CEO William Steere, who had lead the company to the top of the pharmaceutical industry, lacked a system of checks and balances resulting in a power struggle that ultimately led to distrust and the unraveling of Pfizer’s top brass by an outsider . The power struggle that erupted within Pfizer demonstrates how ethical breaches occur under specific conditions and the resulting damage. It is fascinating to observe how the unethical actions of a few individuals can spiral through an entire organization negatively affecting both the companies and their stakeholders. An economic analysis of Pfizer highlights the mismanagement of resources and the ensuing social and financial costs. Pfizer was founded in 1849 by Charles Pfizer and Charles Erhart as a fine chemicals business in Brooklyn New York. In the 1950’s the company changed its focus from fine chemicals into a research based pharmaceutical company. Pfizer’s growth exploded in the 1980’s and 1990’s with the success of drugs like Lipitor and Viagra. Led by William Steere and fueled by profits from Lipitor, Pfizer was entering its glory years. Under Steere Pfizer stock rose to a record high of $49 a share. When Steere took control in 1991 his emphasis for Pfizer was research and development of pharmaceuticals. Pfizer became a benchmark in the pharmaceutical industry and “was ranked among America’s best managed and most admired companies...

Words: 2173 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Wgu Glt1

...Social Issues in the Contemporary United States Rebecca Hall, RN There is a large ongoing list of social issues that are facing the U.S. today. One of the top contenders on that list is the topic of abortion. Abortion in relation to this issue means a termination of a pregnancy. Abortion can occur in any trimester of pregnancy. The issue that faces the U.S. is whether or not abortion should be legal. (Henslin, 2011) To many, abortion is equivalent to murder. It is taking the life of an innocent unborn child. It is inhumane and should be considered illegal. Many people that support the anti-abortion cause base their foundations not only emotionally but also biblically. These people often use biblical scripture that relates to “thou shalt not kill” or the importance and preciousness of human life. (Henslin, 2011) On the opposing end, abortion activists view abortion as a choice for the mother. To this group a law against elected abortion is a violation of a woman’s right to make decisions in relation to her own body. Many debates that arise from this point of view vary from issues of rape causing the unplanned pregnancy, to the simple inconvenience of having a child at that point in time. (Henslin, 2011) Another issue that arises when the issue of criminalizing abortion, is that fact that some people may continue to get abortions illegally and will not receive the proper healthcare that coincides with that type of procedure. Many believe that some women will still have the...

Words: 573 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Brief History of Shia/Sunni

...Let’s begin with the traditional narrative: At Muhammad’s death, there is a power struggle between Abu Bakr and Ali. The supporters of Abu Bakr’s claim are the Sunnis, the supporters of Ali’s claim are the Shi’ite. The Sunnis believe that leadership should be elected from those who deserve it, the Shi’ite believe it should be passed down Muhammad’s bloodline. The Sunnis win out and Abu Bakr takes power. Over time, these two groups have various fights resulting in the civil war termed the Fitnah. There are major theological which are a direct result of differences on where spiritual authority rests. My response: None of this makes sense. Let’s start at the beginning. At Muhammad’s death, there is supposedly a struggle between Abu Bakr and Ali over who should be the leader. This doesn’t make sense. Ali is far too young to be a contender for leadership. Remember, this is still in the early stages of Islam, so everyone is used to the pre-Islamic leadership structure. The leader is traditionally the sheikh, an elder of the tribe who brings wisdom and experience to the table. Abu Bakr, at 61 years old, fits that bill. Ali? He’s in his early 30’s. No one will take his leadership seriously. And that’s something that is very important because whoever takes leadership is going to face rebellion. What happens when you have an extremely strong leader and he dies? People start rebelling. They test how much power the successor can exert over them. They splinter away from the empire and try...

Words: 1426 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Arts of Society

...single-party states | * Contenders (Left to right): Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Stalin, Rykov, Tomsky, Bukharin * Issues affecting power struggle: - Leadership (Collective vs Single) - NEP (End vs Continue) - Revolution (Permanent vs One Country) * Methods he used to come to power (pg103): Lenin’s early death; Lenin’s Secret Testament; Lenin Enrolment; Leninist Foundations; No Clear Successor; Stalin outwitted Trotsky; Changing Politburo members; War Scare; Scissors Crisis * Ban on factions in 1921 | * Mao & Enlai set up Jiangxi Soviet * GMD’s Northern Expedition (1926): Conquer warlords and CCP * CCP Opposition and Long March - Mao & Enlai set up Jiangxi Soviet - Jiang ignored Japanese, focus on CCP - Jiang destroyed Jiangxi Soviet - Long March: <20k survived out of 100k - Mao leads CCP * Jiang: Japanese “disease of the skin” while Communists were a “disease of the heart” * 2nd United Front: w/ CCP against Japanese * Post-War Mediation failed * Civil War (1946-9) | Emergence of leaders: aims, ideology, support | * Power Base: Party Secretary; Positions in Orgburo and Secretariat; Control of Party Organization and Membership * Power Struggle (Boxing Match Thingy): 1: Trotsky didn’t come to Lenin’s funeral, Stalin controlled the funeral 2: Krupskaya read Lenin’s Testament to Central Committee, Zinoviev/Kamenev stopped if from being read to Congress 3: Stalin/Zinoviev/Kamenev beat Trotsky 4: Stalin built power base while Zinoviev/Kamenev...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Conservative Governments

...How far do you agree that the ability of the conservatives to remain in office between 1951 and 1964 was because of the Labour party’s weakness? Conservative governments between 1951 and 1964 have managed to achieve a lot and therefore gain the populations trust. But were the conservative candidates elected thanks to their achievements or due to the weakness of their main contender: the Labour party? We will therefore see in this essay what were their different achievements and weaknesses and their contenders own weaknesses. During the thirteen years the Conservatives were in power after 1951, there were four leaders who held office as prime minister. The first one was Winston Churchill (1951-1955). During his time, there were many developments. First, rationing was ended: British finances were disastrously poor after World War 2 and a lot of Britain’s food was imported and Britain didn’t have any foreign currency to pay for the imports. Britain simply couldn’t afford food from abroad and had to ration the little food they had. The rationing ended in 1954. Nationalisation continued during these years, only steel and iron were denationalised because of many serious problems at the time such as obsolescent plants, outdated technology, lack of capital investment funds and plants operating under capacity and therefore at low efficiency. Denationalisation was the best solution for the industries. The Conservative Party also committed itself to building 300.000 houses a year...

Words: 1445 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Politics

...Modern political campaigners might take a lesson in graciousness and kindness from the great British statesman, Edward Campbell . Once when Campbell was opposing Thackereay for a seat in Parliament, the two contenders, in course of their campaigning, met and engaged in friendly conversation. On taking leave of his rival Thackereay remarked, 'May the best man win!' 'Oh, no,' replied Campbell, 'I hope not, I want to win!' E.J. Dionne Jr., author of They Only Look Dead, ascertains that politics in America today are nothing more than 'politics of moral annihilation'. As an example of this he refers to the presidential election of 1992. Normally , press conferences are called when political matters arise. The conference mentioned was called by the conservatives. Paula Jones came forward and accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment; apparently Mr. Clinton made 'unwelcomed sexual advances" He continues to point out that these are the same conservatives that only a few years earlier had denounced the idea of sexual harassment as 'feminist invention'. It is acts like this that are aiding in the 'moral annihilation' of politics. The overall impact of such politics is undermining the intelligence of the American populous by turning political campaigning into a childlike power struggle. Both the Democrats and Republicans have reverted to a state of guerrilla media warfare. Every time election year rolls around we begin to hear the usual complaints of how politics is morally corrupt. It...

Words: 872 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dominican Baseball New Pride Old Prejudice Chapter Summary

...supplier of players to the MLB. This means, of course, that Dominican baseball, in turn, has changed dramatically as it responds to powerful MLB influences and demands. The plot of Klein’s story is structured around the concept of the global commodity chain. The transnational battle, then, is over the question of who should and will control Dominican player development, training, and contract negotiations, and by whom the island game should be regulated and managed. The story pits the powerful and mostly villainous figure of the MLB against the underdog Dominican buscones, the island’s baseball scouts and business wheeler-dealers. Klein’s achievement in telling the story this way is to highlight the point of view and interests of Dominican contenders for their piece of the baseball pie. This is, for North American readers, a largely unrepresented perspective, and as such makes a...

Words: 1033 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Animal Farm Essay

...Snowball and Leon Trotsky “Animal Farm was meant to help destroy the Soviet myth.” – George Orwell. Orwell was a democratic socialist and this led him to denounce that what was going on in the Soviet Union had anything to do with socialism. As people equated the Soviet Union with socialism, he thought no one could appreciate what democratic socialism is. Orwell doesn’t criticize the act of revolution itself but the misery it could cause if the leaders go corrupt, shortsighted, and greedy. George Orwell’s Animal Farm demonstrates a symbolism of the Russian Revolution through features of Snowball and the historical figure of Trotsky. Animal Farm is an allegorical novel written by George Orwell in 1945 that reflects the social issues of the Soviet Union in the time period of 1917 to 1943. This essay will explain about who Snowball is, who Leon Trotsky was, similarities and differences between these two characters, and the author’s purpose of using Snowball to represent Trotsky in his novel. Snowball is a Napoleon’s rival who contends for control of the Animal Farm after the rebellion. In Animal Farm, chapter two on page 16, it describes Snowball as an eloquent, inventive, and vivid leader. He is most clearly attuned to Old Major’s thinking and devotes himself to actualize it. Snowball insists that in order to defend Animal Farm and strengthen the reality of Old Major’s dream without human beings, the animals should stir up rebellions in other farms throughout England. He brings...

Words: 1617 - Pages: 7