Free Essay

Theory of Democratic Peace

In:

Submitted By jthompson942
Words 2972
Pages 12
Jestin Thompson
Political Science
23 April 2013
Final Paper
Theory of Democratic Peace The idea of democratic peace was brought up in the enlightened era. The theory of democratic peace was based off of Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace.” The theory of democratic peace argues that nation-states governed by democratic regimes do not tend to have conflicts with other countries that would lead to wars. With this theory, it shows that nation-states with a democratic rule are more likely to not go to war with other countries. In some cases, this theory has been proven to be true, but in other cases it has not, especially with the United States. There are many proponents and opponents for this theory. Through this essay, the theory is to see if democratic, authoritarian, and totalitarian rule can coexist peacefully together, which will be proven either to be true or untrue. In 1795, Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, wrote the basis for the theory of democratic peace, which is called “Perpetual Peace.” Through his writings, it explains how countries can reach a perpetual peace and fit the democratic peace theory. In this writing, contains the preliminary articles for perpetual peace among states. This section includes six main topics to help achieve a perpetual peace. First, he explains that after a war there should not be a treaty with provisions for the future wars between the two nation states. Secondly, no state, whether large or small, should be controlled by another state. Third, countries should rid of the standing armies. Fourth, do not borrow money in order to cause external friction with other countries. Fifth, no state can get involved with another states government. Sixth, during war no state should indulge in acts of hostility such as the hiring of assassins, poisoners, breach of capitulation, and incitement to treason against the opposing state.
Naturally of each theory there is always proponents and opponents. In this paragraph, the proponents of the democratic peace theory will be explained. There is the belief that political ideology is the reason for the existence of the democratic peace theory, which contemporary democratic peace theorists believe such as Kant, Doyle, and Russett. The liberal views make this theory true because liberals are peaceful with international relations and develop stable environments. Based on these views there are normative and institutional arguments. The normative argument explains that it is not normal to solve disputes with violence but to solve disputes through negotiations and other peaceful means. Democracies don’t believe in solving conflicts through force. Solving disputes with other countries through violence goes against all the democratic values. The institutional argument explains that there are constraints, which give reasons for not waging wars on other countries. Leaders of democratic states, who start the war, are generally held responsible for the costs and effects of war. Another argument of the democratic peace proponents is interdependence, which is economic related. Since democratic states have a free market system, they are more likely to trade with other democratic states to generate profit and develop a relationship with other countries. Through developing these relationships, it increases peace between the countries. From these explanations, many countries have been proving this theory to be true throughout history.
Just as there are proponents to this theory, there are also opponents of the democratic peace theory. A main argument opposing the democratic peace theory is the definition of war and democracy. Opposing explanations argue that the democratic peace theorists narrowly define democracy and war to fit their perspectives. First, there is the explanation of the absence of war. There are ambiguous statements of whether democracies don’t fight each other at all or they are less likely to fight each other. Second, opposing argument is the definition of war in the meaning of the calculation of deaths. In the definition of the theorists, if there are less than a thousand deaths, it should not be defined as a war. This is a way that the theorists distort the definition of war, so it portrays democratic states as peaceful nations, who don’t go to war with each other. In fact, it’s the opposite because the democratic nations do fight each other, but based off the criteria of having a thousand deaths they never had a war with each other. Last, the democratic nations recognizing each other as democratic nations. With this recognition, it is used as a standard to determine whether democratic states fight each other. Without the mutual recognition, there is no proof that democracies fight each other. In order to be recognized as a democratic state, many of the states that claim to be democratic have to fit the liberal principles. Opposing views of the democratic peace theory believe as times go on this theory will continued to be distorted to fit the different circumstances that are to come in the future.
Further in this essay, three different countries with different governing styles will be used to test the theory of democratic peace’s accuracy or falseness. For the democratic rule, the country is South Africa. Using Russia as the authoritarian rule, and China as the totalitarian rule. By using these countries, it shows if the democratic peace theory applies to other governing styles.
Although South Africa is now a democratic rule, it did not start off with this rule. The first people to live of South Africa are the San people. Following the San people, the Khoikhoi and Bantu speaking tribes settled in South Africa. In 1652, the first European settlers, whom are the Dutch, landed on the Cape of Good Hope. By the 18th century, the Dutch launched a colony, which accounted for 15,000 people including the Boers and Afrikaners, and tried to establish an independent republic. In 1815, the British took possession after the Napoleonic wars, which brought 5,000 settlers. This led to the Afrikaners moving and settling into the territory of African tribes. By 1867, “outlanders” began to arrive because of the discovery of diamonds and gold. Because of this influx Cape Colony’s Prime Minister Cecil Rhodes decided to spark a rebellion against the outlanders in the end it backfired and forced him to resign. On October 11, 1899, the Boers started a war and admitted to defeat by 1902. By 1910, South Africa became union with their first Prime Minister Louis Botha. In 1912, they organized political activity among Africans by starting the African National Congress. As time went on, South Africa’s government has become more corrupt. Jan Christian Smuts refused to sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which brought apartheid to South Africa. The nationalists imposed restrictions on all non-white persons to give them no authority such as banning the African National Congress. Apartheid forced every non-white person out of designated white area. The Africans were moved out of cities to rural areas, where they lived in abject poverty. There were protests against apartheid by the African National Congress because of these protests many were killed. In 1964, Nelson Mandela was put in jail for life because of his rise against apartheid. In 1989, F.W. de Klerk became president, which began the ridding of apartheid. De Klerk released Mandela after 27 years of imprisonment and removed the ban of the African National Congress. By 1991, de Klerk and Mandela started to work on a new constitution, which dismantled apartheid and created a multiracial democracy with majority rule.
As a democratic state, South Africa divides its powers among their government. In their government, there are 3 different levels that include the National level, Provincial level, and Local level. The National level includes a legislative, executive and judicial authority. The Provincial level includes a provincial government, legislative, and executive authority. On the local level, it is filled with municipalities and municipal councils. With their international affairs, South Africa has been having an ongoing dispute with Namibia, a country they once had control over. This dispute is about the location of the boundary in the Orange River. This dispute has started once Namibia has gained its independence from South Africa.
Varangian leader Rurik and his followers landed in Eastern Europe, and helped his people to the Russian city of Novgorod in 862. Oleg, Rurik’s successor, extended the power of Novgorod southward. Oleg gained control of Kiev in 882 marking the first establishment of a unified The empire became known as Kievan Rus’ and flourished for the next 300 years. In the 13th century, Kievan Rus’ was destroyed by the arrival of invaders, the Mongols. In 1237, Batu Khan launched an invasion of Kievan Rus’ from present day Kazan. They destroyed all the major cities of Kievan Rus’ except Novgorod and Pskov. The Mongol state became known as the Empire of the Golden Horde. In June 1812, Napoleon began his Russian campaign. An invasion of Russia was an attempt to force Tsar Alexander I to submit to Napoleon. Eventually Napoleon’s army began to decline from fatigue, hunger, desertions, and raids by Russian forces. A battle was necessary to prevent Napoleon’s rule so the opposing armies met at Borodino field. Neither army gained victory from this battle, just thousands of dead men. Russia then withdrew forces and prompted citizens of Moscow to begin a massive and panicked exodus. Napoleon arrives in Moscow waiting for Alexander, but their wait was in vain and Napoleon ordered his troops to march back home, leaving Russia in victory. When disorder broke out in Petrograd (present day St. Petersburg) in March of 1917 and there was defection in the Petrograd military post the Bolshevik Revolution launched. Nicholas II was forced to renounce his throne on March 15, 1917. Revolutionaries killed Nicholas II along with his family in July of 1918. The standing government lost ground to the Bolshevik and the Kerensky government was overthrown. Authority rested in a Council of People’s Commissars with Vladimir Lenin as prime minister. In 1922, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was established as a union. On January 21, 1924, Lenin passes away, and conflict has risen between Joseph Stalin and Trotsky. Later on, Trotsky was banished from the USSR and Stalin took the position as a prime minister. From Stalin gaining control, he became a dictator and whoever went against him was put into a labor camps. Through Stalin’s rule, the USSR entered World War 2 first supporting Adolf Hitler, but in the end, they go against him. After the war, France, the U.S., Great Britain, and USSR divided Germany. In this division, it caused tensions between USSR and the Western powers, which caused the blockade of Berlin. Tightening its control on Communists states from Poland to Albania, which is called the “iron curtain.” This led to the Warsaw Pact, which marks the beginning of the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR not ending until 1992. In 1992, Russia started a change in economic reforms. In 1993, the USSR became the Russian Federation and established its constitution as a constitutional federation.
As a democratic state, Russia has divided its state powers among the government. The Russian government consists of the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judiciary branch. In the executive branch there is the President and Prime Minister. The legislative branch is divided into two powers: the State Duma is the lower power in Russian Federal Council and the Federation Council is the higher power. Russia’s Judicial Branch consists of the Constitutional, Supreme, and Superior Courts. Russia’s ruling is a democratic state with a republican form of government. Russia has put on a façade of being a democratic state, but in actuality it is authoritarian. Based on the people who have held positions, it has ben the same people switching from being the Prime Minster to being the president. They want to remain in control of Russia without giving any other person the chance to govern Russia. Also many of the people who have power in the government takes on two or three jobs that are meant to be divided among other people. Internationally, Russia and Georgia, a republic, have had conflict. Russia once had control over Georgia before gaining independence on April 1, 1991. In 2008, Russia sent troops to Georgia because two regions, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, have broken away. These two regions asked for Russia’s military assistance, which created more tension between Russia and Georgia. Georgia launched an attack in South Ossetia because they thought a invasion of Russia was coming. Russia sent troops to protect the civilians in the breakaway regions. In November 2011, Georgia and Russia reached a trade agreement.
China has always had a rule where the leader has total control of the country. China’s civilization began in the Shang Dynasty, which lasted from 1500 to 1000 B.C. In the Shang Dynasty, the Chinese developed a writing system, which developed the feudal states into an advance civilization. During the Chou Dynasty (1122-249 B.C.), China has developed the philosophical thinkers such as Confucius, Mo Ti, and Mencius. Under the control of Ch'in Shih Huang Ti, the feudal states were united and the extensive building of the Great Wall of China had begun. From the Han Dynasty, China has started commercial trading in the West. During the T’ang Dynasty, the golden age of Chinese history developed the painting, sculpture, poetry, and a mass production of books. In the last of the dynasties, Ming overthrew the Mongol, and in turn the Manchus overthrew the Mings. From 1839 to 1842, there was the Anglo-Chinese War, which caused instability and concessions to the Western powers. In 1908, the death of the empress and the recession of her infant son were followed by a rebellion, which was led by Dr. Sun Yat- sen, which later becomes the president. He later resigned and allowed Yuan Shih- k’ai to take power. After the death of Yuan, there was more internal conflict in China. On September 12, 1931, Japan launched an invasion in Manchuria to seize the land from China. This continued until 1945, and Japan surrendered to the Western Allies. A civil war between Chiang’s Kuomintang forces and Mao Zedong’s Communists to see who would gain control of China. Despite U.S. support of Chiang, Mao and his supporters managed to take control of China. On October 1, 1949, Mao regime was called the People’s Republic of China.
As a totalitarian rule, China’s form of government is communist. In their government structure, China has a president and vice- president. Another part of their government is the National People’s Congress, this includes a Standing Committee, Chair, and Secretary General. Additional to there Congress, they have a State Council that includes a Premier, Vice- Premier, and State Councilors. Finally, they have a Supreme People’s Court and a Supreme People’s Procuratorate, which both include a president. They are a totalitarian rule because they control every aspect of their people’s lives. China has strict controls their television stations, communication airways, radios, and newspapers. Each family can only have one child. Their people don’t have a choice in what career they want. Last year, China has been having growing tensions with the Philippines and Vietnam over the neighboring islands and its resources. China declared sovereignty over the island, but Vietnam claims the Paracel and Spratly islands while the Philippines say they have territorial claims on Spratly islands. Vietnam and the Philippines have been more aggressive in this dispute by dispatching military ships. There is an unlikely chance that this dispute will be solved diplomatically.
I do agree with the democratic peace theory. In reality, many of the democratic states with liberal views do not have wars with other countries. South Africa proves this theory. Although South Africa has a dispute with Namibia, this dispute has not led to war or any type of violence between the two countries. As a developing country, South Africa is starting to grow and emerge in to the market. They are becoming more involved with trade and creating relationships with other countries to get support. While Russia seems to be a democratic rule, it is authoritarian because its constant rotation of the same two people that are in power of being president and the Prime Minister. Russia having the dispute with Georgia proves this theory because it used force to get their way in this situation. Georgia and Russia had a rise in tension, which caused this sort of violence in these countries. Being a totalitarian rule China wants to have control over everything from its people to seizing other countries or in this case islands. China is willing to do whatever it takes to get its ways even if it results in violence. China will most likely enter this dispute with Vietnam and the Philippines in a violent way. History has prevailed that liberal states are less likely to go to war with each other. Proving that peace can be achieved by the democratic peace theory.

Work Cited
Rosato, Sebastian. "Explaining the Democratic Peace." American Political Science Review 99.03 (2005): 467-72. Print.
Owen, John M. "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace." International Security19.2 (1994): 87-125. Print.
Russett, Bruce, Christopher Layne, David E. Spiro, and Michael W. Doyle. "Correspondence: Democratic Peace." International Security 19.4 (1995): 164-84. Print.
"China." Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"Russia." Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013
"South Africa." Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"Georgia." Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"Namibia." Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"South Africa - Society." South Africa - Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"Chinese Leadership Structure." Chinese Leadership Structure. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
"Government Structure." Government Structure. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.
Kant, Immanuel. Perpetual Peace,. New York: Columbia UP, 1939. Print.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Democratic Peace Theory

...Democratic peace theory, in its wider interpretation, is the empirical observation that democracies rarely, if ever, fight one another and it is this empirical dyadic observation that that has been described as the “closest thing we have to empirical law” in international relations. [1] Although what is meant by democratic peace is contested, and indeed as its validity as this essay will explore, the theory has been previously under Woodrow Wilson and more currently the Presidencies of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, a significant conceptual factor in the formation of American foreign policy.[2] Our aim is a democratic peace, a peace founded upon the dignity and rights of every man and woman. America acts in this course with friends and allies at our sides, yet we understand our special calling: this great republic will lead the cause of freedom. In light of this statement, ongoing U.S. policy and its likely persistence an examination and understanding of the democracy peace proposition is clearly with merit. This essay will look at the democratic peace proposition at a several levels of analysis: at the monadic level of interstate war on whether democracies generally are more peaceful and whether transitional democracies are more inclined to war; and at the intrastate level as to whether democracies experience more or less civil war. It will examine the validity of the proposition(s), reasons for is occurrence and postulate on what implication there may be for...

Words: 5527 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Democratic Peace Theory

...Democratic Peace Theory Democratic Peace Theory, which is firstly originated by Immanuel Kant back in 18th century, is a theory in political science that prevents armed conflict among democracies. The Democratic Peace indicates that democratic states will not get into war with each other; they have a separate peace On the other hand, it is possible for these democratic states to go to war with authoritarian regimes or stateless people. Scholars and academicians believe that democracies find an alternative way to get into a war such as compromises and arbitrations. It has been examined that democratic states have not engaged in a war with one another. Inherently, the number of democratic states expected to rise in the upcoming years of 18th century. As there are more democratic states, as there will be less armed conflicts among each other, which is going to lead the world to a better international system. It has been observed that democracies do get into armed conflict however not with one another; they usually get into war with non-democratic states. It is a significant observation. Democratic Peace Theory is consisted from Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace”. Immanuel Kant claims that peace is a reasonable outcome of the interaction of states with a republican form of government. The main idea behind Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” is that ‘Democracy’ must be spread and made a universal system, in order to create peace amongst the states. This idea of Democratic Peace...

Words: 741 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Is Aanteken

...International Security Lecture 1 March 30th, 2015 The politics of security knowledge What is international security? We could start thinking about the security council of the UN But also about the invasion of Afghanistan (chapter 7 UN in order to secure the international security) We can also think about security in terms of the invasion of Iraq in 2003. This was a unilateral act of war, but sure it can also mean other things We can think of the national security agency, the agency in charge of spying all the signals and communications to a certain extent. What’s interesting about the NSA, it is seen as a threat to the security of the privacy. Lately, with the reports of the UN development programme, we start talking about HUMAN security (not military security, but rather the security of individuals, having a livelihood that’s acceptable). Whether security is international or not, it can be a rather confusing word The protection of values we hold dear. We search for it, we pursue it, we achieve it, we deny it to others. * what is to be secured? Is it the security of states? Or individuals? * What is the actual threat that we’re facing? Primarily to be dealing with military threats, or are there other types of threats we are facing. Essentially contested concept A concept that ‘inevitably’ involves endless disputes about their proper uses on the part of their users – Walter Gallie There can be ambiguity (one persons freedom-fighter is the other’s...

Words: 16869 - Pages: 68

Free Essay

Conscious Capitalism

... Lecture: Josè Alarcòn EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Conscious Capitalism: A more complex form of Capitalism that hold within itself the possibility to enhancing corporate performance while contributing to advance billion peoples’ quality of life...or...just good business. When approaching to this “new” horizon we have to know that is not new...capitalism doesn’t involve avidity and disrespect, it just has been corrupted. When Kant and Montesquieu were talking about the reducing of conflict through commerce, they were talking about just good business. This is a really important thing that has to enlighten everyone while approaching to capitalism in general and, obviously, to Conscious Capitalism. This philosophical and economical theory has to be understood in all its details because it seems there are no trap this time, we have eroded our world till today but maybe tomorrow we can began to “reconstruct” it. In fact, now, we can see our reality and our future “on the shoulder of the giants” (passage from Bernard de Chartres) and of the other tall men that have kept thinking about what the giants saw and sad. We need a “new” focus, we need a wider one, a multiple stakeholder one...without forgetting we need more, wise stakeholder and wise stockholders. TABLES OF CONTENTS: * Executive summary…………………………………………………………………..2 * Table of contents……………………………………………………………………..3...

Words: 2474 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Economic Interdependence

...phenomena. As such global actors, political leaders, political scientists and academia as whole attempts to formulate theories as to explain and makes sense of those events that affect the global community. Those theories also serve the purpose of predicting the outcome of certain actions but more importantly; theories, in the case of international relation serves as a guideline from which political leaders and international actors conduct and formulate their global political agenda. Based on the first great debate of international relations opposing the liberalism to realism, this paper will attempt to argue that democracy is not a guarantee of peace but instead it is the economic interdependence present between states; based on the realist premise that global politics is about competition for power among self-seeking states that seek to maximize their national interests. Arguments will be presented in order to support the stated thesis by consistently outlining the relationship between economic/trade interdependence and political conflict. It is clear that one of the challenges that will arise in the attempt to support the thesis will be how the key concepts are defined and understood as such this paper will provide clear concise definitions of those concepts and ideas. But mostly, those definitions will be the basis upon which the topic of ‘democratic peace’ will be approached. On the surface ideas and enquiries on interdependence and conflict may be recursive in the sense...

Words: 1703 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Arab Spring

...would peace among states (Coetzee 2013: 310). The Arab Spring served as a confirmation that the world would eventually get to a point where it was liberal democratic and that if the Arab world was to be liberated, there would be tranquillity. Even though the aims of the Arab Spring were intended for good, it did not achieve positive results. It actually created more problems and threatened the security and stability of the Arab countries. The theoretical perspective that the author used is a structural realist one. He drew on the theory of Kenneth Waltz and argued that the future of international politics is going to be filled with complications and difficulties. The theory of structural realism argues that the highest goal of states is to attain power (Jackson & Sorensen 2013: 81). Even though this is so, the states are guided by the principle of anarchy and are restricted by the structure of the system since it is the one that determines how states behave. The power of states such as Russia and China is increasing which threatens to move the balance of power from unipolar to multipolar which will be dangerous because the rise in numbers of great powers is likely to cause problems in the future since each state seeks its own interest (Coetzee 2013: 310). [ 263 Words] QUESTION 2 There are two dominant sub themes in the article. The first one is liberal optimism and the second one is the future of world politics. Liberal optimism comes from the “democratic-peace theory” and...

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Liberalism And Democracy

...Liberal Internationalism: Peace, War and Democracy, 1997). Therefore, there are barely any disputes between first world countries which embrace democracy and liberalism as the main doctrine of their governance. This essay argues about the impact of democracy towards peace and how comes peace is embraced successfully among the representatives of democracy. Following paragraphs briefly explain liberalism’s role in today’s world and society, how liberalism reflects in business, what...

Words: 751 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Introduction to Neoliberalism

...Introduction to Neoliberalism/Neoliberal Institutionalism The theory/theoretical framework that is used to examine cooperation between nation-states, which emphasizes the possibility of mutual gains Related terminology 1. Absolute gain: a theoretical option open to political actors based on the belief that decisions will benefit all organisations within a state and/or all member states within an intergovernmental organisation (IGO) Includes all aspects of cooperative behaviour between states; especially power ratios, economic activity and socio-cultural effects 2. Relative gain: a theoretical option open to political actors based on the belief that decisions are only intended to balance power relations between states or increase the power of one state over its rivals Generally disregards economic and socio-cultural considerations, and only allows limited cooperation between states (especially in relations where information about other states’ interests and inclinations is limited) 3. Zero-sum: a relational state wherein a participant's gain or loss is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of the other participants (assuming that total gains of the participants are added, and the total losses are subtracted, the numerical result will sum to zero) Particularly useful in competitive relations, and explains economic behaviour such as opportunity cost and absolute advantage Non-zero sum: a relational state wherein all participants act based upon their respective efficient capabilities...

Words: 1530 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ideational Liberalism

...Rather than assuming that market structure always creates incentives for cooperation among social actors as well as states, or focusing exclusively on those issue areas where it does, as do some liberal ideologies, liberal IR theory focuses on market structure as variable explaining both openness and closure. The resulting commercial liberal explanation of relative gains seeking in foreign economic policy is quite distinct from that of Realism, which emphasizes security externalities and relative (hegemonic) power, or that of Institutionalism, which stresses informational and institutional constraints on interstate collective action. One source of pressure for protection lies in uncompetitive, monopolistic or undiversified sectors or factors that lose the most from liberalization and have an incentive to oppose it. Commercial liberalism has important implications for security affairs as well. Trade is generally a less costly means of accumulating wealth than war, sanctions...

Words: 1691 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Security Dilemma Three Theories

...security dilemma is when one state’s security becomes another state’s insecurity. Vague signals  along with lack of communication can cause uncertainty, which can result in unwanted fighting.  The big question is whether or not we can resolve the never ending security dilemma spiral  through globalization and international institutions. Is it possible to learn from past mistakes and  learn from new perspectives in order to obtain peace, I believe so. This essay will provide  explanations from all of the International Relations theories, and will furthermore discuss how  global order can be achieved through careful cooperation between states.     To begin with liberalism is optimistic about cooperation, and believes that decision  makers are rational and human nature is good. Liberalism focuses on three main concepts:  international institutions, democratic peace, and economic interdependence. Liberalists view war  as avoidable if government is reduced and if more international institutions are created. They  hold international institutions with a lot of merit. Firstly, they consider international institutions  to create peace because the institutions reduce transaction costs, make state commitments more  credible, enable states to discuss issues multiple times, and encourage countries to join in  multilateral collective security mechanisms ( Textbook p. 117­118).  International...

Words: 1153 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Difference Between Realism And Realism

...Jager (2015) defines idealism as a theory that states that our reality is shaped by our thoughts and ideas. Realism on the other hand deals with the fact that reality has an absolute existence independent from our thoughts, ideas and even consciousness. This essay intends to contrast idealism and realism that is outlining the differences between the two theories. The first part is the comparison of the two theories, the second part discusses the differences between the theories with examples to elaborate. In conclusion the essay purpose that the reader is able to differentiate with a clear understanding of the two theories in the context of international relations. Idealism, according to (Heywood, 2014) dealing with how we view things whether in an ideal or perfect manner and Realism dealing with treating with things in a practical way and viewing some situations pragmatically and makes idealism focus on “what could be done” and realism focusing on “what actually is”. Generally idealists are under the impression that human nature is good and with regards to international relations the cycle will initially attain peace, whereas realists sorely believe that the cycle of international relations will not change, it will always be anarchic...

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Business Leader Research Paper

...and values. In fact, a lot of political leaders seem to severely be deficient in numerous of the majority necessary leadership qualities. This assay will be analyzing on one of African president ever recognized as dedicated leader; who dedicated his entire life fighting for freedom of his nation. Mandela was born in Transkei in a small rural community in the easterner cape of South Africa. On 18 July 1918 and named Nelson by one of his teachers, Mandela led the struggle to reinstate the apartheid rule of South Africa against racial discrimination. As well-known as a democratic leader he was incarcerated for 27 years. Has been awarded the Nobel peace prize in 1993 and 1994 Nelson Mandela been voted as South Africa first black president. The assay will seem at his behavior, characteristics as leader, and the style of his leadership at last relate his leadership with particular theory of leadership that is transformational leadership model. Leadership is a function of personal and professional qualities (retrospection), the conception of a vision, structure and satisfying a sense of collective purpose, and make sure carrying out, with strategy and culture as two situational or contextual factors. Mr. Nelson Mandela Charismatic personality he’s...

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Is Global Civil Society an Answer to War?

...Essay Title: Is Global Civil Society an answer to War? Introduction War is not a modern phenomenon but as old as human existence itself. Wars are not like natural calamities or phenomenon but are very much part of human existential dynamics that seeks both peace and ability to survive acknowledging its natural competitive behaviour which unlike realist assumptions is conditioned and not natural. However, realism has dominated the field of international relations since the end of World War 11. It dominates political thinking, with exclusive emphasis on the state as the primary actor in world politics. Realists display a very overt pessimistic view of human nature, advocating with religious conviction that selfish human nature drives international relations into conflicts subjugating state to resort to organized violence and wars in order to gain upper hand and to always resort to wars to resolve international conflicts. Thus resulting in a system framed to maximize state’s military power in a predominantly anarchical environment. As a distinct school of thought, Realism emphasizes separation from domestic to international with little or no democratic structures within its sphere. Consequently, warfare has remained an institutionalized social order against the predatory behavior of others and consequently a legitimate instrument of survival. Moreover, growth in the size of armies and the development of weapons technology has led to an increase in the frequency of wars resulting...

Words: 3354 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy

...The impact of domestic determinants on foreign policy has long been a widely debated topic in the field of international relations, and foreign policy analysis in particular. Some scholars argue that domestic politics and foreign policy are two independent arenas of issues. Others believe that the two respective issues do not stop at the water’s edge. Foreign policy and domestic politics are interdependent and could spill over into each other. While both schools of scholars make some convincing arguments about their respective cases, it’s probably reasonable to expect that the degree of influence between domestic and international determinants of foreign policy is contingent on different foreign policy contexts. In some cases, international factors play a more important role, whereas in other cases, domestic reasons are more important. In this presentation, I put forth a conglomeration and an intellectual web analysis in examining the domestic determinants of national foreign policy. Prior to reaching this goal a definition offered by Webber and smith in 2000 on foreign policy is stipulated. The interpretation of domestic determinants as illustrated by Sulliban is furthermore encapsulated. According to Webber and Smith, A country's foreign policy, also called the international relations policy, is a set of goals outlining how the country will interact with other countries economically, politically, socially and militarily, and to a lesser extent, how the country will...

Words: 3397 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Realism and Liberalism

...Realism and Liberalism Political realism believes that politics, like society in general, is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature. In order to improve society it is first necessary to understand the laws by which society lives, the operation of these laws being impervious to our preferences. Realism, believing as it does in the objectivity of the laws of politics, must also believe in the possibility of developing a rational theory that reflects, however imperfectly and one-sidedly, these objective laws. It believes also in the possibility of distinguishing in politics between truth and opinion – between what is true objectively and rationally, supported by evidence and illuminated by reason, and what is only a subjective judgment. Realism is a theory within international relations which predicts states will act in their own national interest in defiance of moral consideration. In general, this belief results from an observation of human nature and the perception of people as selfish and fiercely competitive. Realism regards the international arena as anarchic, governed by no authority overriding sovereign states. International institutions such as the United Nations are not afforded significant credibility from a realist perspective. Rather, influence is perceived to be held predominately by major powers such as the United States, whose dominance is a product of military and economic strength. Realists hold the primary interest...

Words: 2876 - Pages: 12