Bily V. Arthur Young & Co., Supreme Court of California

In: Business and Management

Submitted By shanshanwu335
Words 361
Pages 2
Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., Supreme Court of California
3 Cal. 4th 370; 834 P.2d 745; 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 51; 1992 Cal. LEXIS 3971; 48 A.L.R.5th 835

Key Facts
Plaintiffs, an individual investor, a corporate investor, and associated individuals, invested in a computer company that went bankrupt. Plaintiffs brought an action against defendant accounting firm, Arthur Young, alleging intentional fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiffs contended that their investments were made in reliance on defendant's unqualified audit opinion on the company's financial statements.
Whether and to what extent an accountant's duty of care in the preparation of an independent audit of a client's financial statements extends to persons other than the client.
An auditor could be held liable for negligent misrepresentations in an audit report to those people who acted in reliance upon those misrepresentations in a transaction that the auditor intended to influence, in accordance with the rule of Restatement Second of Torts section 552.
An auditor's liability for general negligence in the conduct of an audit of its client financial statements was confined to the client. Other people could not recover on a pure negligence theory.
Although intended beneficiaries of an audit report could recover on a theory of negligent misrepresentation, they could not recover on a general negligence theory.
One who made a fraudulent misrepresentation was subject to liability to the people or class of people whom one intended or had reason to expect to act or to refrain from action in reliance upon the misrepresentation.
Non-clients of the auditor were connected with the audit only through receipt of and express reliance on the audit report. Without such reliance, there was no recovery regardless of the manner in which the audit itself was conducted.

Similar Documents

Supreme Court Case

... can do more harm than good. "What's at issue is: (1) whether it will remain permissible to consider race in an attempt to ensure that higher level education remains integrated; and (2) whether universities or the court are going to be the ones to determine what academic diversity consists of," said David D. Cole, a professor at Georgetown Law, who believes UT's plan should be upheld. It was only recently, in 2003, that the Supreme Court narrowly upheld the limited use of race in public university admissions policies in Grutter v. Bollinger. The five-four opinion was written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who said that diversity was a compelling government interest. But O'Connor has since retired from the high court, and has been replaced by Justice Samuel Alito, who is more skeptical of race-conscious admissions preferences. In 1997, the Texas legislature passed the "Top 10 Percent Law," which mandates that Texas high school seniors in the top 10 percent of their class be automatically admitted to any Texas state university. But after the Grutter decision came down, another policy was added that allows the school to consider race among several other factors for admission. Fisher did not qualify for automatic admission, and was forced to compete with other non-top-10-percent state applicants. She said she was denied admission, even though her academic credentials exceeded those of some of the admitted minority candidates. The University of Texas, which was racially...

Words: 1102 - Pages: 5

U.S. Supreme Court Case

... and in the other the boy was an accessory to murder. Each boy was sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. One case involved a burglary that ended with the store clerk being shot and killed, while the other involved a case of arson. These cases outlined will test the Supreme Court’s past rulings in the determination of teens not being small adults and that they must be given a second chance for redemption. The reason I chose these cases to write this paper on is because my interest is in the juvenile justice field of the law. The reason for my interest in the juvenile sector of the criminal justice system is because of my own juvenile history. When I was young I had my own run-ins with the juvenile justice system and although these cases are far worse than what I went through, let’s just say I have a soft spot for juvenile offenders and believe there is most often an underlying reason as to why juveniles act out and end up on the wrong side of the law. Now let’s get back to the case at hand. I will be referencing this paper on only one of the two cases. The case in which I chose is the case involving defendant Jackson from Arkansas, charged with aggravated robbery and capital felony murder. In the case Miller v. Alabama, United States Supreme Court case number 10-9647, the petitioner Jackson along with two other male offenders set out to rob a video store. As the three boys proceeded to the video store Jackson...

Words: 1211 - Pages: 5

Supreme Court Cases

...Court Cases: US v. Lopez (1995) Is the Gun Free School Zones Act an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s power? This case was based on the commerce clause. Alfonso Lopez walked into his San Antonio high school carrying a concealed weapon, violating a Texas law that banned firearms in schools. But the next day those charges were dropped and he was then charged with offending a federal law: The Gun Free School Zones Act. He was indicted and found guilty, and sentenced to six months in jail. He challenged his conviction saying that the federal government had no control in education, but the federal government said that it had the authority to ban guns in schools under the commerce clause. The Supreme Court rejected the federal government’s claim, holding that the law wasn’t related to commerce. The Court stated if they upheld the government’s statement, then there wouldn’t be limitations on federal government’s power. The Court referenced the Founders’ belief that there should be a balance between state and federal government powers. The case is significant to society because it’s the first time in fifty years that Congress overstepped its power under the commerce clause. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Does the elastic clause give Congress the power to create a national bank? This case was based on the elastic clause. The state of Maryland passed a law in 1818 taxing the national bank’s Baltimore branch $15,000 a year. The branch refused to pay; instead it sued the......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Us V Arthur Young

...The United States, Petitioner, v. Arthur Young & Co. 465 U.S. 805 (1984) Facts: A certified public accountant firm, Arthur Young, conducted an audit of the corporation’s financial statements. The CPA firm accepted the corporation statements related to its contingent tax liabilities, and prepared tax accrual work papers that evaluated the corporation’s reserves for the contingent tax liabilities. The IRS conducted a routine audit that resulted in a criminal investigation of the corporation’s tax returns after questionable payments that came from a “special disbursement account” were found. The IRS attempted to retrieve the work papers from the CPA firm, but were denied because the CPA firm had been instructed by the corporation to not release the work papers. Issues: The issue involved in this case is whether the IRS has the authority to request the workpapers from the CPA firm. Arguments and Authorities: The IRS cited IRC §7602(a) which gives the Secretary of the Treasury the authority to “examine any books, papers, records, or other data that may be relevant or material” to an investigation into a tax issue. In this case the work papers were relevant to the IRS’s case. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the work papers were relevant, however they reasoned that a work product immunity doctrine was necessary to ensure integrity within the securities market and promote full discloser between accountants and their clients. The denied to enforce the...

Words: 374 - Pages: 2

Supreme Court Essay

.... John Louis Evans soon turned into a landmark debate of whether the death penalty should be kept in the United States. Although the practice is perceived to keep criminals off the streets, there are three main problems that disqualify its apparent “benefit”. The first problem analyzes the financial costs of the process itself. According to the calculations by Judge Arthur Alarcon and Professor Paula Mitchell, the cost of the death penalty has totaled over $4 billion since 1978 to 2012 in California alone (Alarcon). In addition, only 13 inmates have been executed in California out of the total estimated 731 on death row as of April 2013. If California's governor commuted the sentences of those remaining on death row to life without parole, it would result in an immediate savings of $170 million per year, with a savings of $5 billion over the next 20 years (Alarcon). The second problem pertains to the constitutionality of certain court cases and whether it is deemed appropriate. Since 1973, over 130 people have been released from death rows throughout the country due to evidence of their wrongful convictions (Death Penalty and Innocence). In 2003 alone, 10 wrongfully convicted defendants were released from death row (Death Penalty and Innocence). That fact itself proves that the legal justice system can be skewed and can put innocent people behind bars. The final problem extends to the basic root of the controversial issue revolving around it being inhumane and...

Words: 1620 - Pages: 7

Power of Supreme Court

...The Power of the Supreme Court Cannot be Justified in a Democracy (45) The US Supreme Court has a number of powers. These include the power to declare acts of Congress, the executive or state legislatures unconstitutional through the power of judicial review. The supreme court justices are also given the power to interpret the constitution when making decisions, again, through their power of judicial review. It is arguable that it is essential for the supreme court to have such powers in order to allow the American democracy to flourish. However, there is much evidence to suggest that the supreme court holds too much power for an unelected body, thus hindering democracy. The ambiguity of the constitution means that there is much room for interpretation. Since interpreting the constitution is the role of the supreme court, the supreme court is often seen as a quasi legislative body. This is because through its interpretations, particularly those made by loose contructionists, the supreme court acts as an additional legislature. It's decisions can have the same effect as passing legislation. For example, the Grutter vs Bollinger decision (2008) involved the courts laying down a time frame for which affirmative action can be deemed necessary. This effectively acted as a piece of legislation even though it did not pass through Congress. This can be seen as being problematic and potentially damaging for a Democracy. Justices are unelected, they therefore lack legitimacy and...

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

Supreme Court Interviews

..., as concisely, and as precisely as used to be possible. One of Scalia’s pet peeves is something that is happening recently, a word that is becoming less useful than it used to be, and that is the word cite, to cite. In more and more briefs, people use, “He cited to Marbury v. Madison.” You don’t “cite to” a case; you “cite” a case. And when you put in the unnecessary to, you make it impossible to use the indirect-object construction, which was possible when you used the direct object; that is to say, you used to be able to say, “He cited Marbury to the court.” You can’t possibly say, “He cited to Marbury to the court.” But it’s basically illiterate to put in the to, and it’s a shame. It’s dulling one of the tools of our language. Scalia does not like extra words in sentences that do not do something. When he edits drafts of his law clerks, most of Scalia’s work consists not of additions, but of deletions. And when he re-edits his own work, He usually cuts out words that on reflection seem to me unnecessary. When you write well, you capture the attention of your audience much better than when you write poorly. To be a good legal writer you must be literate, that’s number one. Besides being grammatical, avoiding legalese, avoid trendiness. That’s probably the other extreme of legalese. Justice Anthony Kennedy There’s always a purpose in writing. Most young lawyers will have their first experience in sending a memo to another lawyer in the firm or to draft a memo...

Words: 1407 - Pages: 6

California Supreme Court

...Court system of California is the largest systems about 12% of the U.S population are served. Major cases California courts starts in trail courts which are present in each and every 58 counties of California State. These courts hear criminal, civil, family, juvenile, probate, mental health and traffic cases. Before courts of appeal Supreme Court review most of the cases. Supreme Court is the highest Court in the California and reviews decisions of the court of appeal in order to solve the conflicts and settle the law questions. California Supreme Court has one Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. It has 7907 fillings and about eighty five written opinions. Each Justice is appointed by Governor. The decision of Supreme Court provides guidance for the lower courts which shows effects on the residents of California. Supreme Court has decisions to decide which decisions can be review but is definitely want to review all the cases where death penalty is imposed. Supreme Court can also review the decisions of state Bar of California regarding the suspension of judges for misconduct. All the decisions of Supreme Court are in the form of written and available for public. They are made accessible through websites and official reports. Supreme Court functions for the development of law which are applied by trial and appellate courts. Supreme Courts reviews cases which will enable it to settle legal questions and to see that the law is uniformly applied throughout the state.......

Words: 295 - Pages: 2

Supreme Court Justices

...Supreme Court justices are just politicians in black robes Supreme court justices are politicians. They are politicians alongside their duties of judges of the highest court in the land. The most basic definition of a politician is, a person that achieves a position of policy making over an organized community. Judges, in theory, should be fair, unbiased, neutral, impartial and not based or linked to any political party or movement. However, decisions made by the Supreme Court judges have had huge political significance. While it’s not the standard in lower courts, the United States Supreme Court is forced to make political and judicial decisions. A judicial decision is based on the question was a law broken. However, because the Supreme Court is the highest court of the land, they also must make political decisions some of which have been more powerful that the actual laws congress had written. The Supreme Court is in charge of making sure congress and the president don’t overstep their authority, and to do this job of keeping these branches accountable it would be impossible for the justices to not be politicians yielding real power. One of the examples of the supreme courts political power the court case Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). Estelle Griswold was the executive director of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut; she and Dr. Buxton of Yale Medical School opened a clinic in Waterbury and after only serving 10 patients Griswold and Buxton were arrested and...

Words: 2189 - Pages: 9

Supreme Court Knowledge Check

...The chain of events leading up to the Supreme Court case U. S. v Clarke included summonses issued by the IRS to four people associated with Dynamo Holdings, L.P. for evidence and documents related to Dynamo’s tax liability for 2005-2007. Large interest expenses reported in those years were in question. Dynamo had agreed to two year-long extensions of the usual 3-year limitation period for assessing tax liability. When the four individuals failed to comply with the summonses issued in September and October 2010, the IRS pursued the issue in District Court in April 2011 to enforce the summons under United States Code Section 7602(a), which gives the Secretary the power to examine relevant or material information and to summon liable parties. Under Reisman v. Caplin, 375 U. S. 440, 449 (1964), the summons was challenged by respondents, attempting to question the responsible agents and claiming the IRS had questionable motives in issuing the summonses. The respondents held that the IRS issued the summonses to “punish Dynamo for refusing to a further extension of the applicable statute of limitations.” Additionally, the respondents claimed that the IRS decided to enforce the summonses following Dynamo filing suit in Tax Court in order to avoid the Tax Court’s limitations on discovery, thus gaining an unfair advantage. This request was deemed incorrect matter of law and was denied by the District Court because the respondents did not point to specifics that might raise...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Supreme Court Case Study

... Supreme Court case of Riley v. California. “Modern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. With all they contain and all they may reveal, they hold for many Americans “the privacies of life,” The fact that technology now allows an individual to carry such information in his hand does not make the information any less worthy of the protection for which the Founders fought,” Riley v. California (573 U.S.__2014). The problem is not necessarily in the collection of data, but rather, how the data are used, and the potential for misuse. Allowing the government to collect and store unlimited meta-data is a highly invasive form of surveillance of an individual’s communications activities. These records enable the government to know the identity of every person with whom a citizen communicates electronically, how long they conversed, and their location at the time of the call. The government could potentially use this information to build a comprehensive picture of every American. For example, if NSA data reveals Mr. Roche communicated on several occasions with pornography addiction hotlines, what was actually said during his conversations is not necessary for NSA to form a profile of him. The NSA could easily use our phone records to discover an individual's network of associations and communication patterns. Additionally, this type of data collection carries the potential risk that a third party could get a hold of it and use it for criminal, or personal...

Words: 2770 - Pages: 12

U.S Supreme Court Case Buck V. Bell

... actions of young men are more likely to be treated as crimes. Ethnicity and crime Patterns and trends * In 2008, the Ministry of Justice reported that, compared to white people: * Afro Caribbeans were: more likely to be arrested for robbery; three times more likely to be cautioned by the police; three and a half times more likely to be arrested; if arrested, more likely to be charged and face court proceedings than to receive a caution; more likely, if found guilty, to receive a custodial (prison) sentence; five times more likely to be in prison. * Asians were: twice as likely to be stopped and searched (mainly for drugs); more likely to be charged and face court proceedings than to receive a caution; more likely to receive a custodial sentence if found guilty; more likely to be arrested for fraud and forgery. * In 2007, 26 per cent of male prisoners and 29 per cent of females were from black and minority ethnic groups (they make up about 9 per cent of the general population). * These patterns, shown in contemporary official statistics, reflect a pattern that first emerged in the 1970s, suggesting what appear to be higher levels of criminality among some minority ethnic groups, particularly the black population. Explanations for links between ethnicity and crime * Higher crime rates might reflect that compared to white people, minority ethnic groups tend to have higher proportions of young people, those suffering social......

Words: 25825 - Pages: 104

Supreme Court Cases

...Karen Franklin Grantham University GP 210 04/14/2016 Supreme Court Cases The 9 members of the United States supreme court: Justice | Date of Birth | Appointed by | Sworn in | Vacant (Antonin Scalia) | 3/11/1936 Died 2/13/2016 Age: 79 yr 11 mo | Ronald Reagan | 9/26/1986 Served: 29 yr 4 mo | Anthony Kennedy | 7/23/1936 Age: 79 yr 8 mo | Ronald Reagan | 2/18/1988 Served: 28 yr 1 mo | Clarence Thomas | 6/23/1948 Age: 67 yr 9 mo | George H. W. Bush | 10/23/1991 Served: 24 yr 5 mo | Ruth Bader Ginsburg | 3/15/1933 Age: 83 yr 0 mo | Bill Clinton | 8/19/1993 Served: 22 yr 7 mo | Stephen Breyer | 8/15/1938 Age: 77 yr 7 mo | Bill Clinton | 8/3/1994 Served: 21 yr 8 mo | John G. Roberts | 1/27/1955 Age: 61 yr 2 mo | George W. Bush | 9/29/2005 Served: 10 yr 6 mo | Samuel A. Alito, Jr. | 4/1/1950 Age: 66 yr 0 mo | George W. Bush | 1/31/2006 Served: 10 yr 2 mo | Sonia Sotomayor | 6/25/1954 Age: 61 yr 9 mo | Barack Obama | 8/8/2009 Served: 6 yr 8 mo | Elena Kagan | 4/28/1960 Age: 55 yr 11 mo | Barack Obama | 8/7/2010 Served: 5 yr 8 mo | A Texas resident wanted to terminate her pregnancy through abortion, but Texas law prohibited abortions unless they were happening to save the mother’s life. The right to privacy which is in the fourth amendment is the laws that was being challenged and in this case it was protected under the fourteenth...

Words: 489 - Pages: 2

The Supreme Court V. the 14th Amendment

...The Supreme Court V. The 14th Amendment I. Introduction A. The Supreme court presided over three cases in the span of ten years that grossly affected the country. B. The 1873 ruling of the Slaughter House Cases, the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, and the 1896 case of Plessy V. Ferguson. II. Body A. The 1873 ruling of the Slaughter House Cases. 1. A Louisiana law of 1869 created a state corporation for the slaughtering of livestock. The corporation was given exclusive power to slaughter livestock, and all other private slaughterhouses were required to close. Independent butchers could use the corporation’s facilities for a charge, but could not conduct independent operations. 2. The butchers not included in the monopoly claimed that the law deprived them of their right to "exercise their trade" and challenged it under the 13th and 14th amendments. The highest state court sustained the law. 3. The states have the proper police power to limit slaughter house operations for the health and safety of their residents. The meaning of the 13th and 14th amendments must be derived from the historical context of the problems they were designed to remedy, namely African slavery. The Congress, after the end of the Civil War, sought to strengthen the freedom of the former slaves by passing these amendments. 4. Specifically, they only were meant to guarantee federal privileges, not state privileges, whatever they may be. The "privileges and immunities" clause did...

Words: 706 - Pages: 3

Supreme Court Case

...Supreme Court Case Jamie Wallace CJA/354 August 5, 2012 Graham Quisenberry The Supreme Court case I chose for my assignment is titled “Supreme Court mostly rejects Arizona immigration law; gov says ‘heart’ remains.” Immigration is a controversial area for society and the law in United States, even more so after the terrorist attacks in 2001. The state of Arizona in April 2010 implemented laws that would crack down on immigration violators to protect the citizens of Arizona and the citizens of the United States. The summary of what this article covers is the U.S. Supreme court struck down key portions of a law that was enacted by the state of Arizona in April 2010. According to the Cohen (2012) website Arizona sought to deter illegal immigration that allows a provision to check a person’s immigration status while still enforcing other laws. The ruling behind the Supreme Court’s decision is that the federal government has the power that can block any law and all of Arizona’s authority figures must comply with the federal law when conducting any immigration status checks or they may face challenges considered to be unconstitutional. What interested me the most about the article is the controversy that surrounds this subject. Racial profiling is a controversial subject that brings much debate with it. When one looks at the law and what law enforcement officers do as part of their duty, at times there is racial profiling that will take...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4