Premium Essay

Democratic-Republican Dbq

Submitted By
Words 748
Pages 3
From the time of 1801 to 1817, the Democratic-Republicans were in control of the oval office. Jefferson was the first ever elected Democratic-Republican, and Madison was the second. The ideal image of a Democratic-Republican, or Jeffersonian, was an individual who believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution and had beliefs opposite of the Federalists. The Democratic-Republican Presidents, Jefferson and Madison, interpreted the Constitution strictly; however Jefferson often manipulated his interpretations to be favorable to himself. Thomas Jefferson was the first Democratic-Republican to take the oval office. He often interpreted the Constitution rather strictly, but sometimes interprets it loosely when beneficial. For example, …show more content…
He contributed vastly by drafting the Virginia Plan which influenced the creation of the House of Representatives. Madison, a Democratic-Republican, always interpreted the Constitution strictly. For example, he chose to increase the army of the United States (Doc 4). During the Jefferson administration, however, the American people were used to little activity in the army. This struck some federalists by surprise since many Jeffersonian’s do not believe in a strong central army. Madison was enforcing the Constitutional right to create or supply an army. After the tensions of the Embargo Act ended, Madison had another threat to their economy, the British and French. The British refused to repeal the Order of Council and the French resumed seizing American ships. Because he created a larger army, many people thought of him as an “old Federalist” because he was creating an army (Doc 6). In the beginning, Madison had a weak economy to deal with and two major powers that could defeat him easily. Building an army and supporting the economy were ways that Madison helped to decrease those threats. Also, raising taxes was one way for the federal government to increase revenue. Madison had to create an army and place tariffs in order to defend their economy and their nation. Another example of when Madison interpreted the Constitution strictly was when he vetoed the Internal Improvements Bill. Madison believed that the Constitution never expresses the right to construct roads and waterways (Doc 7). He believed that the power to control the economy does not come with the power to build roads and waterways (Doc 7). This instance shows Madison being a true Democratic-Republican that only wants to pass laws clearly stated in the Constitution. Anything implied he says cannot be part of the success of the Constitution (Doc 7). Another example is when Madison vetoed a bill to put a Protestant Church in the United States

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

...Is There Really a Difference between the Republican and Democratic Parties? Throughout modern American history, there have been many debates between the Rupublicans and the Democrats. Whether it comes down to what they've done for the american government or how each party differs from one another, there's no question that these two parties are the driving force behind what we know today as the American Government. The truth is, these parties greatly differ from one another and is shown through party ideologies, organization, and certain events in history. The history of the oldest running political party in the world is a complex and diverse one. The democrats, founded by Thomas Jefferson himself, have gone through numerous trials and tribulations to be the politcal party it is today. Stemming from conflicts with the Federalists over Jay's Treaty, it was apparent that " a deep rooted philosophical difference existed between the two factions"( Rutland 10). Because of this struggle for power and differences between the two factions, the Democratic-Republican party was born. Throughout it's history, the democratic party has held onto a few specific ideals that make them different from the republicans. First and foremost, the democratic party started from two main ideals that stem from the Declaration of Indepence, liberty and equality for all. Jefferson believed that the working class people of America werent being treated fairly compared to the wealthy class and landowners...

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The First Party System: Why Thomas Jefferson Was Responsible

...The First Party System: Why Thomas Jefferson was Responsible American History to 1877 Thomas Jefferson is responsible for dividing the Federalist party of the late 1700s and creating what is known today as the first party system. Thomas Jefferson, who supported a small national government and individual rights, changed American politics by advocating rights of small planters and western farmers to divide the nation once united behind Federalist ideals. By dividing the once united Federalist party into two separate groups, he was able to gain the support needed to take the office of the President away from the Federalist party. This feat was more than a challenge for Jefferson and would shape the structure of American political parties forever. (1) In 1788, George Washington was the first President of the United States and he chose two men with contrasting views on what the fate of the United States should be as part of his advisory board. Thomas Jefferson was chosen by Washington as the head of Department of State. Jefferson was a Virginian and diplomat, known for his views on small national government and representing the small planters and western farmers of America. George Washington then chose Alexander Hamilton as his secretary of the Treasury. Born and raised in the Caribbean, he worked for Washington as his aid during the revolutionary war and was a lawyer. Hamilton was known for his views on a strong national government. He favored merchants and financiers...

Words: 1916 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Love

...economies. Resulting in testing the Americas Neutrality and hurting their trading. Jefferson passed this document restricting neutral trade to the U.S. docs Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists (1780). Stronger central government, state representation from states each 2 representatives, no Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation useless, because states had more power, wanted larger public, and they believed in large farming and industrialization,.. antif federalist, wanted state rights, wanted add the House of Represeantives, Bill of Rights, they thought the aritcles needed to be ratified not taken away completely, smaller public, believed Americas future is small farming Federalists vs. Democratic-Republicans (1790s) – Hamiltonians (known as federalist party) vs. the Jeffersonians (Democratic Party) Differences between Federalist stances (1780s) vs. Federalist Party stances (1790s)- Federalist of 1780-Stronger central government, state representation from states each 2 representatives, no Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation useless, because states had more power, wanted larger public, and they believed in large farming and industrialization.. Federalist Party Stances of (1790)- Led by Alexander Hamilton strong central government led by the wealthy and industry, emphasis on manufacturing ,trading, and shipping.. loose interpretation...

Words: 2158 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans

...The United States of America was founded on a Constitution that was supposed to preserve our freedoms and certain liberties. All Americans at that time wanted to keep America a free an independent nation with rights for its people. However there was two different groups, the Federalists lead by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, which thought this could be achieved in very different ways. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were very different in their methods to try and develop America as a nation. The two were very much alike because they both were avid Americans, and wanted to see the nation succeed. Both men were very involved in the U.S. Government and tried to voice their opinions on the best method for success. Neither of them would give any ground on their ideas, which created great conflict in the first years of the U.S. Government. Alexander Hamilton was a member of the Federalist Party. He supported a larger central government where the states had less power than the Federal government. Hamilton believed that bigger central government would provide assistance to programs and business to help them succeed. “Not only the wealth but the independence and security of a country appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufacturers” (Document C).Hamilton thought that the U.S. should lean more towards a manufacturing economy opposed to an agricultural one. Along with that idea Hamilton thought that...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Abortion

...Act. 2. John Adams – Served 4 years as president, was part of the Federalist Party. Domestic Policy- Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, the Direct Tax of 1798 Foreign Policy - The XYZ Affairs, Treaty of Mortefontaine When Adams signed and instated the Direct Tax act which was taxing on land to pay for our country to rebuild the navy was a positive thought but the negative consequences was the Fries’s Rebellion it created. 3. Thomas Jefferson – Served 8 Years as president. His party was the Democratic- Republican. Foreign Policies- Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Tax Act Domestic Policies – He drastically cut the federal government reducing spending in his administration as well as the armed forces, he voluntarily stepped down after two terms and declared that no president should serve more than two terms. One positive Jefferson had while in office is he reduced the national debt by more than 25%. 4. James Madison – Served 8 Years as president, Part of the Democratic - Republican Party. Domestic Policies – A second bank was chartered for a 20 year term, Madison created a system of checks and balances for the federal government. Foreign Policies – Madison brought a list of grievances against the English be voted on to go to war in 1812 against Great Britain,...

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

History of Political Parties

...development. Meanwhile on the other side of the fence was Thomas Jefferson. His vision of America was different, he believed in an American government that allowed agriculture to thrive by limiting central government and allowing the states to handle local matters. By limiting the involvement of central government, farmers would be able to grow their crops in peace and, trade the fruits of their labors for manufactured goods with neighboring countries (Henretta, J. A., & Edwards, R. 2012 p.199). With these ideologies in mind, both men started campaigning for supporters. Those who sided with Thomas Jefferson became known as the Democratic-Republican Party and those who opposed Jefferson and embraced Hamilton’s views became the Federalist Party. Initially the Federalist Party had the advantage, their network of newspapers out numbered the Democratic-Republicans by 4 to 1 (Stewart, 1969, p.622). These newspapers were used to spread the word and ideas identifying political parties. However by 1816, the Federalist began...

Words: 1065 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Hartford Convention, Rush-Bagot Agreement, and the Monroe Doctrine

...continuation of the War of 1812.2 When Madison was re-elected in 1812 the discontent in New England intensified. In late 1813 Madison signed a more restrictive embargo act than any of those approved by Jefferson, this time prohibiting all trade between American ports (the coastal trade) and fishing outside harbors.3This conference occurred at a time in the war of 1812 "when American prospects seemed darkest".3 The purpose of the convention was to discuss "public grievances and concerns" , that is, among other things, the conduct of the war by the Democratic-Republican Party.4 Although the Federalist party was established with the idea of a stronger central government,5 this meeting/convention of New England Federalist adopted a strong states' rights position and expressed its grievances in a series of resolutions against military conscription and commercial regulations.6 The delegates of this convention argued that the Democratic-Republican Congress violated the Constitution by declaring an unwanted war.4 As a result, those states not did not approve of the war had a right to override the action of congress in declaring this war.4 "The report said that New England had a "duty" to assert its authority over unconstitutional infringements on its sovereignty."6 The Hartford Convention's final report proposed several amendments to the U.S....

Words: 1216 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Two-Party Politics

...beliefs and ideals of each of the parties. Generate a list of at least 10 of President Jefferson’s decisions and actions. Decide which party’s ideals are most aligned with the decision or action and provide an explanation of why the decision or action aligns with that party. |Decisions and Actions |Democratic-Republican Party’s Beliefs and Ideals |Federalist Party’s Beliefs and Ideals | |Less formal White House, from parties and |These actions line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist Party believed in keeping an air of elegance about the | |dress, to mode of transportation for the |because they were for less government, and definitely against creating |office of president, as well as maintaining a formal attitude in the White| |president. |another monarchy. Also, this party stood more for the lower classes. |House | |Jefferson repealed many taxes and reduced |These actions also line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist’s were in favor of taxation, knowing that some form of | |the number of federal employees. |and ideals for small, weak government. Repealing taxes put the tax |taxation is necessary to run the government efficiently. | | ...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Apush

...Confederation, was unable to exercise real authority, although it did successfully deal with the western lands issue. The Confederation’s weakness in handling foreign policy, commerce and the Shays Rebellion spurred the movement to alter the Articles. Instead of revising the Articles, the well-off delegates to the Constitutional Convention created a charter for a whole new government. In a series of compromises, the convention produced a plan that provided for a vigorous central government, a strong executive, the protection for property, while still upholding republican principles and states’ rights. The Federalists met strong opposition from Anti-Federalists, especially in Virginia and New York, but through effective organization and argument, they succeeded in getting the Constitution ratified. By establishing the new national government, the Federalists checked the Revolutionary values of the popular republican government. Terms/names/topics:...

Words: 3481 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Summary: DBQ Accuracy Of Political Beliefs

...Ryan Stiskin APUSH Period 3 11/23/14 Mr.Polanis DBQ Accuracy of Political Beliefs The two main parties during the early 1800s included the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. The difference between the two parties was their choice of how the constitution should be interpreted. The Federalists followed a “loose” interpretation of the constitution, while the Jeffersonians followed a “strict” interpretation of the constitution. The Federalists and Jeffersonians each had their own interpretation of the constitution but were not always adamant in following it. The Jeffersonian Republicans were seen as “strict” constructionists and believed the constitution should be interpreted exactly as its written. The Jeffersonians wanted to...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nationalism

...DBQ: Nationalism & Sectionalism By John A. Braithwaite DIRECTIONS: The following DBQ is based upon the accompanying documents and your knowledge of the time period involved. This question tests your ability to work with historical documents. Your answer should be derived mainly from the documents, however, you may refer to historical facts, materials, and developments NOT mentioned in the documents. You should assess the reliability of the documents as historical sources where relevant to your answer. Check your school and community libraries for materials and also, surf the internet to help you find relevant outside information. QUESTION FOR ANALYSIS: In the period from 1815 to 1858, two giant forces—nationalism and sectionalism--ostensibly in opposition to each other—prevailed simultaneously in the first half of 19th century America. Describe these two forces and discuss the geographic, political, constitutional, economic, and diplomatic contrasts of both forces. PROMPT: Formulate a thesis statement Use documents as well as your own outside knowledge of the period. Deal evenly with all aspects of the questions Be sure to cover the time period given • Assess the validity of the documents • Draw effective and specific conclusions whenever possible TEXTBOOK RECOMMENDATIONS Gillon & Matson The American Experiment Boydston & McGerr Making A Nation Murrin, et.al Liberty, Equality, Power Norton...

Words: 3103 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

American Life During and Post-Civil War

...Veer Shah AP United States History DBQ Essay #3: “American period between 1860-1880” The historic period prior to the 1860s was the most underlying era in American society as it led to the bloodiest war in the American history, the Civil war. Prior to the Civil war, the American politics were sectionally divided between the Northern Republicans and the Southern Democrats. The political culture was almost saturated as both sections had realized that the numerous compromises would only provoke questions and dissimilarities between them, with the largely interfered question of slavery and suffrage. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had been implemented as a nationwide direction towards admitting states with reference the 36° 30´ latitude line, either as a free-state (above line) or as a slave state (below the line). Despite of the temporary success of the compromise of 1820, it was repealed by the Stephen A. Douglas in 1854 in his Kansas-Nebraska Act. Likewise, the Compromise of 1850, created by the Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, was an effort to preserve the Union by settling the issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. Although it assured a temporary peaceful settlement between the sections, it failed to give birth to the Civil war and the rise in sectionalism. Although all these compromises had served their desired intents, politically as well as socially, in turn, they only played a catalyst role in increasing the tensions...

Words: 2988 - Pages: 12