Free Essay


In: Social Issues

Submitted By suriyaswati
Words 2043
Pages 9

The main belligerents in the Bosnian War were the forces of the Republic of Bosnia(Bosnian Government Forces) and Herzegovina and those of the self-proclaimed Bosnian Serb and Bosnian Croat entities within Bosnia and Herzegovina,Republika Srpska and Herzeg-Bosnia, who were led and supplied by Serbia and Croatia respectively.
The war came about as a result of the breakup of Yugoslavia. Following the Slovenian and Croatian secessions from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1991, the multi-ethnic Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was inhabited by Muslim Bosnians(44 percent), Orthodox Serbs (31 percent) and Catholic Croats (17 percent), passed a referendum for independence on 29 February 1992. This was rejected by the political representatives of the Bosnian Serbs, who had boycotted the referendum and established their own republic. Following Bosnia and Herzegovina's declaration of independence (which had gained international recognition), the Bosnian Serbs, supported by the Serbian government of Slobodan Milosevic and the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), mobilized their forces inside the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in order to secure Serbian territory, then war soon broke out across the country, accompanied by the ethnic cleansing of the Muslim Bosnian and Croat population, especially in eastern Bosnia and throughout the Republika Srpska. The Muslims were the people who were affected by the ethnic cleansing, but it was the Bosnian govt. forces that had an armed conflict with the Bosnian Serbs.

The indictment charged Tadic with a list of crimes allegedly committed in the Prijedor region of Bosnia-Herzegovina between 25 May 1992 and early August of the same year. Many of the counts in the indictment concerned events said to have taken place at a camp at Omarska, where large numbers of Bosnian Muslims and Croats were detained by Serb forces. The charges dealt with accusations of rape, unlawful killing, torture and cruel treatment. In respect of each of the alleged incidents the indictment charged the defendant under Articles 2, 3 and 5 of the Statute of the Tribunal. Thus, the indictment, which concerned an accusation that the defendant had raped a woman prisoner at the Omarska camp, charged him:
(a) with
(i) a grave breach of willfully causing great suffering, under Article 2(c) of the Statute or, in the alternative,
(ii) cruel treatment under Article 3 of the Statute; and
(b) With rape, as a crime against humanity under Article 5(g) of the Statute.
The decision concerned a challenge by the defendant to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal on three grounds:
(a) The Tribunal had not been lawfully established;
(b) That the primacy over national courts which Security Council resolution purported to give to the Tribunal was unlawful; and
(c) That the Tribunal lacked subject-matter jurisdiction in respect of the charges laid against the defendant.
ARGUMENTS AND DECISIONS:- 1. The appeals chamber held that the establishment of the ICTY fell squarely within the power of the Security Council under article- 41 of the United Nations charter and that ICTY had been ‘lawfully established’. The Appeals Chambers determined that there had been a threat to the peace in the former Yugoslavia justifying the Security Council’s invocation of chapter- VII served as an appropriate legal basis for establishing an international criminal tribunal. 2. The defendant maintained that the Tribunal lacked subject-matter jurisdiction in respect of all these charges, on the ground that none of the acts alleged in the indictment had taken place in the course of an international armed conflict. According to the Prosecutor, the Security Council had treated the entire conflict in the former Yugoslavia as an international armed conflict, as was shown by its calls to the parties to observe the Geneva Conventions and its references, in a number of resolutions, to grave breaches of those Conventions. In the alternative, the Prosecutor submitted that the Tribunal's jurisdiction regarding war crimes and crimes against humanity was not confined to acts taking place in an international armed conflict. The laws and customs of war referred to in Article-3 of the Statute had to be taken to include all the customary international law of armed conflict, including that part which was applicable in non-international armed conflicts. The Trial Chamber held that the existence of an international armed conflict was not a requirement for the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 2, 3 or 5 of the Statute. In view of its decision regarding the scope of application of Articles 2, 3 and 5, the Trial Chamber considered it unnecessary to determine the character of the armed conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina, although it noted that there were 'clear indications' in the material before it that the conflict was an international one.
On appeal, the Appeals Chamber upheld the dismissal of the defendant's challenge to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal but did so on grounds which differed in significant respects from those of the Trial Chamber. The defendant's submission to the Trial Chamber was that there had been no international armed conflict, on appeal he sought to argue that there had been no armed conflict of any kind in Prijedor at the relevant time. Instead, he maintained that the Serb inhabitants had assumed authority in the region without active resistance on the part of the Muslim and Croat inhabitants, so that, whatever the position may have been in other parts of Bosnia-Herzegovina, there had been neither an internal nor an international armed conflict in Prijedor. This argument assumes that an armed conflict exists only in those parts of a State (or States) where actual fighting is taking place at any given time. However, as the Appeals Chamber held, there is nothing in the Geneva Conventions or other rules of humanitarian law to justify such an assumption, let alone the conclusion which the defendant apparently sought to draw from it, namely that the conditions of detention of prisoners detained away from the scene of the fighting would not be subject to humanitarian law. On the contrary, many provisions of humanitarian law are expressly intended to apply away from the scene of the fighting or after active hostilities have ceased. Therefore, that the Appeals Chamber held that: “ armed conflict exists whenever there is a resort to armed force between States or protracted armed violence between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between such groups within a State. International humanitarian law applies from the initiation of such armed conflicts and extends beyond the cessation of hostilities until a general conclusion of peace is reached; or, in the case of internal conflicts, a peaceful settlement is achieved.”
On this basis, the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina is considered an armed conflict by May 1992 and the acts alleged in the indictment were sufficiently connected to that conflict to be subject to the rules of humanitarian law, irrespective of whether there was any fighting in the Prijedor region itself.
The Appeals Chamber did not, however, accept that the situation in the former Yugoslavia should automatically be regarded as a single armed conflict, which was wholly international in character. Instead, it held that the conflict (or, rather, the conflicts) had both internal and international characteristics.
In particular, the Decision takes as a starting point that: “To the extent that the conflicts had been limited to clashes between the Bosnian Governments forces and Bosnian Serb rebel forces in Bosnia-Herzegovina, as well as between the Croatian Government and Croatian Serb rebel forces in Krajina (Croatia), they had been internal (unless direct involvement of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) could be proven.”

Unanimously, that the Accused was found GUILTY on 11 counts charging him with persecution and 14 beatings. The Chamber has found the accused "untruthful" as to his whereabouts at the time of the alleged offences and has been satisfied beyond reasonable doubt by the Prosecution's evidence that the accused either was present at the scene of, or did participate into, the alleged offences.
Analysis of the judgment of appeals chamber * The verdict represents the first ever judicial condemnation of the "ethnic cleansing" policy. * As pointed out by the Chamber itself, this judgment is "the first determination of individual guilt or innocence in connection with serious violations of international humanitarian law by an international tribunal (...).The international military tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo,..., were multinational in nature, representing only part of the world community". * The Appeals Chamber was right to reject the argument that the Security Council had, in effect, already determined that the totality of the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia were to be treated as international in character. There is no indication in the text of Resolution 827, establishing the Tribunal, in the Statute of the Tribunal, which was annexed to that resolution, or in the Report of the Secretary-General, on which the Security Council acted in adopting that resolution, that the character of the conflict had already been determined. * Secondly, there is nothing intrinsically illogical or novel in characterizing some aspects of a particular set of hostilities as an international armed conflict while others possess an internal character. Conflicts have been treated as having such a dual aspect where a Government is simultaneously engaged in hostilities with a rebel movement and with another State which backs that movement. The International Court of Justice in the Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua stated:
“The conflict between the contras' forces and those of the Government of Nicaragua is an armed conflict which is ‘not of an international character'. The acts of the contras towards the Nicaraguan Government are therefore governed by the law applicable to conflicts of that character, whereas the actions of the United States in and against Nicaragua fall under the legal rules relating to international conflicts”.

* Thirdly, the complexity of the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina itself since May 1992 suggests that the conflicts taking place there should not be treated as a single, international armed conflict, but must rather be regarded as possessing both internal and international aspects. Thus, the hostilities between the Bosnian Government forces and troops from Croatia and Serbia/Montenegro were clearly international in character, once Bosnia-Herzegovina had become an independent State. At the other end of the spectrum, it is difficult to see how the hostilities between the Bosnian Government forces and dissident Muslim forces in Bihac can be regarded as anything other than an internal conflict.

[ 1 ].
[ 2 ].
[ 3 ].
[ 4 ]. These Articles define the principal heads of the Tribunal's jurisdiction in the following terms:
Article 2: Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949
Article 3: Violations of the Laws or Customs of War
Article 5: Crimes against Humanity
No charges were brought against Tadic under Article 4 of the Statute, which gives the Tribunal jurisdiction over allegations of genocide.
[ 5 ]. Brief to Support the Motion on the Jurisdiction of the Tribunal (23 June 1995), Section 3 ("Defence Trial Brief).
[ 6 ]. Prosecutor's Response to the Defence's Motions filed on 23 June 1995 (7 July 1995), 47-59.
[ 7 ]. Article 3: Violations of the Laws or Customs of War
The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons violating the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to:
(a) employment of poisonous weapons or other weapons calculated to cause unnecessary suffering;
(b) wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;
(c) attack or bombardment, by whatever means, of undefended towns, villages, dwellings or buildings; (d) seizure of, destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion, charity and education, the arts and sciences, historic monuments and works of art and science;
(e) plunder of public or private property.
[ 8 ]. Appeals Chamber Decision, para. 70.
[ 9 ]. Ibid ,para-77
[ 10 ]. Ibid para-72
[ 11 ]. The Arbitration Commission of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia fixed the date on which Bosnia-Herzegovina became a State as 6 March 1992, the date on which the result of the referendum on independence was announced; Opinion No. II. 96 ILR 719.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Judiciary System in Ecuador

...projects related to the system of administration of justice. 2. Cortes provinciales de justicia (Provincial Courts of Justice) There is a Provincial Court in each province of the country. The Judicial Council determines the number of courts and tribunals according to the needs of the population. 3. Consejo de la Judicatura (The Judiciary Council) The Judiciary Council is composed of 9 members and their respective alternates that last for 6years and may not be re-elected. Its conformation tends to be equal between men and women. Functions: 1) To define and implement policies for the improvement and modernization of the judicial system. 2) To know and approve the budget of the judiciary system, with the exception of the autonomous bodies. 3) To direct the selection process of judges and other servants of the judiciary, and their evaluation, promotion and punishment. All processes will be public and reasoned decisions. 4) To manage the judicial career and professionalization, and organize and manage training schools and judicial training. 5) To ensure transparency and efficiency of the judiciary. 4. Corte constitucional (The Constitutional Court) The Constitutional Court is the highest organ of control, constitutional interpretation and...

Words: 2021 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Appointment of Judges in Higher Judiciary: a Step Towards Landmark or Marked Land

...Constitutional Law - II on the topic ------------------------------------------------- Appointment of Judges in Higher Judiciary: A Step Towards Landmark Or Marked Land As a part of Project Work For the academic year 2013- 2014  Prepared & Submitted by: Submitted To : Ashish Somani Asst. Professor 12BAL051 Ms. Alunkrita Tripathi ‘A’ section Appointment of Judges in Higher Judiciary: A Step Towards Landmark Or Marked Land ABSTRACT In India, the judiciary is regarded as the most efficient organ of the government from the legislation, executive and the judiciary which stands at par in their powers deriving from the constitution of India. As said by Shri D.D. Basu, a renowned jurist in India, there should be a check and balance system between the organs of the government but it should not encroach upon the ancillary functions. In the six decades of India being a republic this check and balance system, especially in the judicial appointments in the higher judiciary India has witnessed certain topsy- turvy situation. From the inception of the constitution the appointments of the higher judiciary is by the executive that is the president which was followed by various cases leading to the judges transfer III cases...

Words: 3628 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Sources of Law

...SOURCES OF LAW 1.1 Classification of Law Law is a set of rules that control the human behaviours that is developed over a long period of time that regulates interaction that people have within one another. It is also a set of rules that humans have to follow and it set standards and conduct between *individual and individual* and *individual and the government* which is enforced by law through sanctioned. Public law Public law is a law which governs the relationship between individual and the state. Public law can be further divided into constitutional law and criminal law. - Constitutional law Body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. - Criminal Law It is a body of rules and statute that defines the conduct prohibited by the government. In Malaysia, the penal code is a main source of criminal law. It covers most criminal offenses and provides relevant penalties where relevant acts are breached .It actually codifies various acts committed by individual against the state such as murder, cheating, forgery , rape, and other criminal offenses. Common law A law that derive from case law (precedent) and statute. It is accusatorial with an emphasize remedies. It form a basic right of English law and it can be found in the U.S , other commonwealth nation including Australia, Canada, Singapore, New Zealand, parts of Africa , India and Pakistan. Malaysia derives their legal...

Words: 1838 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...Unit 1 assignment: 1) Branches of Government: Through separation of powers, the U.S. Constitution established aCongress and gives the power to LEGISLATE or make the law in certain areas, provides a chiefEXECUTIVE (POTUS) whose function is to execute or enforce the laws, and helps create a federalJUDICIARY to interpret the laws. (chapter 1 page 2) Branches of Government were created by our forefathers so that one man/woman wouldn’thave all the powers to make all and any decision he/she wanted to make. By creating the threebranches of government, the Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary, the founding fathers of thisnation would ensure we as Americans wouldn’t be ruled by a king, but rather a well-balancedgovernment. As it says in our text, the Legislative branch of the Government (Congress) is the law makingbranch for the nation. Congress outlines and establishes the laws to be upheld by every citizenof the United States. The Executive branch (POTUS) is designed to enforce laws upon theAmerican people and be a figure head for the people at the highest level of government. TheJudiciary branch (Courts) was established to correct those that failed to follow the laws at thefederal and local levels while providing their interpretation of the laws created by congresstherefore closing the loop in our federal government. 2) Case Law: Or Common law is law made and applied by judges as they decide cases notgoverned by statutes or other types...

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Law Opinion Paper

...The United States has a democratic government which is governed by laws that are introduced by public officials. The United States has a legal system that has three branches to have a division between federal and state law. The three branches of government are legislative, executive, and judiciary which all play a role in the legal system and the creation of laws. The branches of government were put into place to create a system of checks and balances. The branches work together because no single branch of government can act freely based on its own will. The laws and practices of the United States were created based on the foundations of English common law. Also there are many factors that lawmakers must consider and acknowledge before writing laws to be reviewed and executed. The legislative branch was established by Article I of the constitution and consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The constitution gives this branch the authority to pass legislation and send it to the President to be signed, the bill must pass in the Senate and the House with majority vote. Although, the President can veto the bill it can be overridden by passing the bill again through the House and the Senate with at least a two thirds majority vote in favor. The executive branch includes the President of the United States who acts as the head of state and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The executive branch is the branch of government that governs the law enforcement...

Words: 808 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Court History and Purpose

...system for the American colonies was established as early as 1629 in Massachusetts. They created what was known by as a general court system. This court was comprised of 118 elected officials, and 18 assistants. This in fact set off a chain reaction and a decade later county courts were developed and the general court took on the role of a higher court. As time progressed, so did the courts. By 1776, all of the American colonies had established fully functional court systems (Schmalleger, p. 313, 2009). In wasn’t until 1789 when congress gathered to discuss a judicial power for the United States. So on March 4th of that same year the Supreme Court was established as the higher court for America. President George Washing signed the Judiciary Act on September 24, 1789, and later that day nominated John Jay of New York to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (The Supreme Court of the United States, 2012). The justices changed a number of times throughout time, but after a time it was necessary and was determined that nine justices shall serve on the...

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...Do Heroes exist in the present day? Heroes can be found in every person. However, heroes do not have superhuman ability but they do what they do for the greater good. I believe a Hero is someone that shows great strength courage and is willing to fight for justice. A Hero is wise and trustworthy. Heroes not only exist in the past but they exist in the present day as well. People that are part of the judiciary system could be considered modern day heroes, if they don't shoot and kill innocent people. They defend the community from unjust acts, they protect the community from people that steal, people that murder, people that commit fraud, people that kidnap etc. A Hero could even be someone that has authority. Some examples would include a police officer, a teacher, a lawyer, a judge, a psychologist or even a counselor. I believe strongly that a Hero is a person that helps someone even in the face of danger. A psychologist could indeed be someone’s Hero because he/she can make people realize their issues. They could even help solve those issues and helped you become a better person in the process. In conclusion I believe Heroes do in fact exist in the present day; We just don’t recognize them but they are there. Heroes can be found in EVERY person like your best friend, your cousin, your brother, your sister, your uncle, your boyfriend. They might have helped you. For example they could have helped you get out of a fight, helped you control your temper when you lost...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Employment Law and Labor

...When this happens regulations from the government can clash with the union’s. These types of issues can sometimes lead to complications due to legalities ( The entire ideation with this type of testing is to locate the best fit for the opportunity being offered to the candidates. The testing is put in place to eliminate low retention within the working environment. The addition of testing candidates online has given many organizations the ability to conduct this type of testing. The administrating organization must take note to format the proper testing in order to evaluate all candidates in a proper fashion ( The organization used in this assignment is a particular judiciary system within the United States. This system employs thousands of employees. Due to this testing for candidates must be concise but must also not affect any legalities that could appear due to improper testing methods. The first thing that is done is separating the various positions into separate categories ( I will recommend 3 different avenues for testing possible candidates. These are cognitive, physical, and personality. These types of testing can prove to be very important to any hiring manager and/or authority within an organization. 1. The first form is known as cognitive testing. This type of testing is important in order to test candidates on their...

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Branchs of Government

...Running Head: BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT Branches of Government January 26, 2010 Abstract: The following paper will review the branches of government and their role within our Constitution and the reasoning behind the various branches to ensure the peoples of the United States of America are guaranteed specific rights. It will establish an understanding of the three branches of government that ensure the Constitution is upheld. These three governmental forces still govern the laws in the United States today. Introduction In creating the Constitution the forefathers of this nation designed a government with three distinctive elements that established responsibilities and upheld the Constitution. These men were dedicated to ensuring that each branch of government has a role in upholding the rights of the people. The three branches of government created are The Judicial Branch, The Executive Branch, and The Legislative Branch. In examining the creation of the branches of government it has become apparent and the following table will establish that these branches create a balance of power. The following table defines the interaction between the branches of government: Branches of Government | Legislative BranchSenate and House of Representatives | Judicial BranchSupreme Court | Executive BranchPresident and Cabinet | Duties and Responsibilities | Legislative branch creates laws and AmendmentsLegislative branch has the power over all the money spent; can create or...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Judicial Branch

...Business Law I Due: Feb 4th 2010 The Judicial Branch The Judicial branch of government of the United States was set up by article III of the Constitution. The Judicial branch is given great power over the common law, but still very limited due to a complex system or checks and balances. The Federalist Papers 78-83 describes in great detail the newly proposed system of judicial government. The author of these papers was Alexander Hamilton. John Jay, and James Madison contributed to the other parts of the Federalist. The most interesting aspect of the judicial branch is the way it fits into the system that also is comprised of the Executive branch, and the legislative branch. Alexander Hamilton writes, “The judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them”. The executive branch can be viewed as the, “sword of the community”, and the legislative has the power to create the laws the all citizens of the United States must follow (Hamilton 78). The brilliant thing is even though it seems the judicial branch of government does not carry as much power, it never states that in Hamilton’s letters due to the fact that the judicial branch is considered an “indispensable ingredient” (Hamilton 78). The power of the judicial branch may be considered not as direct as the other branches, but is still powerful nonetheless. The...

Words: 1170 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Social Media

...Assignment 1: Social Media Medina 1 Prof: LEG 100: Business Law 1 July 25, 2013 Medina 2 A few years ago I jumped on the social media bandwagon after being introduced to it by my father. I was always a little skeptical about social media because of all negative that I had heard about it. Now, I love it because there is a lot of positive about social media as far as I am concerned. Social media is an asset to marketing, and it is fun for personal use as well. I am fan of Facebook so I will discuss how it can direct consumers to a better source of purchasing. A Legally Astute Marketing Manager According to our text a legally astute manger has four components; a set of value-laden attitudes about the importance of law to the firm’s success; a proactive approach to regulation and legal issues; the ability to exercise informed judgment when managing the legal aspects of business; the appropriate use of legal tools and context specific knowledge of the law (Bagley, 2013, p. 11). The legally astute social media marketing manager has to take those components a step further. The legally astute social media marketing manager must embrace social media and its networking power to drive sustainable change in the...

Words: 1604 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...Independence of judiciary means a fair and neutral judicial system which can afford to take its decision without any interference of executive or legislative organ of the government. The concept of separation of judiciary from the executive refers to a situation in which the judicial branch of the government acts as its own body free from intervention and influence from the other branches of the government particularly the executive. If the same individual assumes the functions of both executive and judiciary the necessary check and balance disappears and rights of the citizen are not adequately protected. Separation of judiciary from the executive universally ensures the independence of judiciary and safeguards the rights of the people. The question of separation of judiciary from executive is not new in our country. In fact, demand for separation of judiciary from executive had been a part of the movement for democracy itself and its implementation was part of the election pledges of both the major political parties. Article 22 of our constitution says, “The state shall ensure the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive organ of the state”. Separation of judiciary is included in Part II of our Constitution, i.e. the fundamental principles of the state policy; and Part V of the Constitution deals with the judiciary. But unfortunately no government since 1972 when the constitution was framed ever took steps to effect the separation. Finally in 1999 while delivering historic...

Words: 3344 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Court System

...Overview of the United States and Mexico Court Systems “Court system the judiciary also known as the judicial system or judicature is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in the name of the sovereign or state” ( Freedman, 2000). The judiciary provides a mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Purposes and responsibilities of courts require balance between external and internal accountability. Courts do not serve their enduring purposes or continuing responsibilities unless their structure, governance, operations, programs, processes, and performance lead to the reality and deserved public perception that the judiciary is accountable. The courts’ responsibility for the proper use of public money is to ensure rule of law, equal protection and due process, individual justice in individual cases, and the appearance of individual justice in individual cases. In the United States, judicial branches of the federal and state governments are charged with the application and interpretation of the law. The U.S. court system is divided into two administratively separate systems: the federal and the state. Each of these systems are independent of the executive and legislative branches of government. Such a dual court system is a heritage of the colonial period. “By the time the U.S. Constitution had first mandated The Judiciary Act of 1789 the establishment of a federal judiciary, each of the original Thirteen Colonies already had its own comprehensive court system...

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Separation of Power

...the abuse of powers. This means that when a single person or a group of people have the extreme amount of power they can become dangerous to the citizens. As it was put forward by John Locke that “it would be a great temptation to human weakness if the same person to make law has the power to extinguish them because they may exempt themselves from obedience to the law or may suit the law in the making and execution to their private advantage”. Thus, the doctrine of separation of power is a method of removing the amount of power in one group's hands and controlling the powers of the organs of the government because it becomes more difficult to abuse the power. Example: Even though the parliament has the power to enact the laws, the judiciary has the power to declare whether the law is constitutional or unconstitutional through check and balance. It insures justice to the people. Through separation of power each organ of the government can be independent...

Words: 731 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Alexander Hamilton: The Three Branches Of Democracy

...perspective the judiciary as he stated, was the least favored branch in the constitution. Also, the judicial review of legislation also implies that the Judicial Branch can’t do much in terms of taking away rights from individuals. Though unfortunately, it has often been complicit in letting the Legislative Branch take away those rights. In reality it is the Legislative Branch that is obtaining those certain rights. As Hamilton explains in The Federalist, the judiciary does not hold such higher powers as the other branches do. Alexander Hamilton simply positioned for the other branches to remain and be different from the judiciary. The solution he proposed to be different and that would provide a separation of the branches would be that the incumbent of the appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States would be granted a “lifetime position” where they could not be removed as long as they maintained “good behavior”. Hamilton also recognized that the...

Words: 556 - Pages: 3