...At some point in our lives, we have all heard about Adolf Hitler, the Austrian born German politician and the leader of the National Socialist German Workers that led the Anti-Semitic movement in Germany in the early 1900’s. Looking back through history, people would differ in opinion when deciding if Adolf Hitler should be considered a true leader. Leadership is the action of leading a group, but in today’s society the Leadership concept has also been associated with positive, beneficial, and ethical actions. True leaders are people that others want to follow. In Hitler’s case he was initially able to connect with people through his charismatic oratory and Nazi propaganda and convince them to join him in his cause. It is unfortunate that his cause became an obsession and led Hitler to recur to constant threats and brutal actions to instill fear within his troops and avoid desertion. My impression of Hitler is that he was initially a true leader but his leadership was very poor as it relates to developing the people under his responsibility. Hitler did not focus his efforts into positive actions. He achieved many of his goals and made history. But what good does it make to be remembered by the atrocious actions he committed against the Jew community. Opposed to Hitlers practices, leaders must communicate faith to their people, not fear. Fear paralyzes people while faith moves people to action and infuses them with courage and hope. Let your people know that you believe...
Words: 579 - Pages: 3
...Leadership characteristics define many prominent figures throughout history. The view of what good leadership is varies from place to place or even from person to person. Good leadership is often associated with positive role models such Gandhi or Martin Luther King. Yet, good leadership is also visible in unscrupulous figures such as Genghis Kahn and Adolf Hitler. The following paragraphs will compare and contrast leadership characteristics between Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill. An examination of their goals and leadership characteristics will show that these individuals had quite very different objectives.; hHowever, the leadership processes they used were frequently similar. Adolf Hitler and Winton Churchill were among the greatest leaders in world history and certainly during the years of World War II. History perceives Churchill as a positive character and Hitler as an example of an unscrupulous leader who brought death and destruction. Churchill led Great Britain as a prime minister during World War II, while Hitler was a leader of Germany. Churchill and Hitler were very different individuals. In many ways their leadership styles and approach seemed similar, however, their backgrounds were quite different. Churchill came from a wealthy and famous family while Hitler, in contrast, was born into a family of commoners. Both of them lost their fathers during their youth; Hitler was 14, Churchill was 20. Churchill was a patriot and a prominent speaker who gave...
Words: 1140 - Pages: 5
...ADOLF HITLER- LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES James Latronica Edison State College ADOLF HITLER- LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Even though he is famous for the wrong reasons and perhaps evil ones, Adolf Hitler will be remembered for a long time. He is one of the most famous villains of the 20th century world history. His rule over Germany and parts of Europe left a mark that is felt even today, decades after he died in the war. His rule saw Germany take over more territories than it had in its history prior to that period. For many military professionals, Hitler was a remarkably successful leader. However, his leadership led to the death of millions of people from his home country. While his followers called him a great leader, his enemies, who seem to be the majority, saw him as a threat to humanity. Hitler believed in a country of pure people; a superior race. For him, however, a superior race could not be comprised of Jews and other sickly people. He therefore put all the people he disliked in work camps while continuing to kill the rest. While the leader was relentless, it is noted that he did not have the best judgment. He thought that the superior race was composed of physically strong people. It has, however, been proven that the mind is almost all the time stronger than the body. It is important to acknowledge that, while his methods were wrong, his leadership was effective. He was able to run a country while waging wars...
Words: 2361 - Pages: 10
...Visionary Leadership There appears to be a particular trend in research on charismatic leadership. Most of it subsumes vision within charisma. Some scholars even suggest that it is the vision that leads to the attribution of charisma to the leaders in the first place. However, we think that charisma and vision are two distinct concepts and as such a leader may be charismatic but not visionary, or visionary but not charismatic, both charismatic and visionary, or neither. To us, charisma is an emotion-based construct or a ‘heart’ thing and charismatic leaders understand their social environment very well and are masters of social skills. Vision, on the other hand, is a competence-based construct, a combination of intellectual ability and experience, largely a ‘head’ thing. A charismatic leader is an enthusiastic, self-confident leader whose personality and actions influence people to behave in certain ways. The five common traits of such leaders are: * They have a vision * They are able to articulate that vision * They are willing to take risks to achieve that vision * They are sensitive to both environmental constraints and follower needs * They exhibit behaviours that are out of ordinary Charismatic leadership is more likely to be in politics, religion, wartime or when a business firm is starting up or facing crisis. Example of charismatic leaders include: Jeff Bezos, Martin Luther King Jr, Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison. Charismatic Leadership Quoting...
Words: 1220 - Pages: 5
...interpretations for the term LEADERSHIP. One is “A relationship through which one person influences the behavior or actions of other people” (Mullins, L.J. 2002, Management and Organizational Behavior, 6th Edition, FT Publishing, p904). Another popular definition would be, “the process of influencing an organization or groups within an organization in its efforts towards achieving a goal” (Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy, 7th Edition, FT Prentice Hall, p.519) Leadership Theories on Behavior To me, leaders are constantly surrounding us. People constantly need to be led and they seek out individuals around them who have personalities that stand out – the basic qualities of leadership, the Great Man Theory. This could be in terms of their appearance, knowledge, charisma, behavior or style. For example, popular actors/actresses might not be great leaders but they influence the thoughts of people through advertisements through their appearance and charisma. Leadership is also a process where trust of people needs to be gained and established before followers are doing things willingly and without having to use pressure. Managers are different in this aspect, as they are given authority/power and trust factor might not be required to actively participate in management, subordinates might not be performing their tasks willingly. The above idea is adopted from the most recent leadership definition by Manfred...
Words: 1955 - Pages: 8
...FÜHRER HITLER MGT380 BIC1323A FÜHRER HITLER When a person thinks of an influential leader throughout history, thoughts usually tend to steer towards ethical or religious leaders such as, Ghandi, Jesus, Martin Luther King Jr, Abraham Lincoln, Mother Theresa, etc. To categorize Adolf Hitler into this group of moral individuals seems appalling and discourteous to the above named leaders. However, the most encompassing definition of a true leader is a person with the “ability to influence followers to achieve common goals through shared purposes” (Weiss, 2011). While his moral compass was fragmented and his ethics seem non-existent, Adolf Hitler had the leadership ability to instill core ideals and standards into his constituents, to motivate his followers to all work towards a common goal and to influence his followers to change their “actions, behaviors and their opinions of others” (Weiss, 2011). According to the Trait Theory, or “great man” theory, certain traits and characteristics in men are supporting factors in that person being an effective leader (Weiss, 2011). Hitler differentiated himself as a great leader in his possession of many of those traits: assertiveness, initiative, dominance, self–confidence, stress tolerance, responsibility, achievement orientation, adaptability, cleverness, persuasiveness, organizational and speaking abilities, risk taking, and originality. “His was no ordinary dictatorship, but rather one of great energy and magnificent planning”...
Words: 1070 - Pages: 5
...Essay Topic: “Up to 1939, why did many Germans support Hitler and his Nazi dictatorship? “ In modern day history, Hitler is widely viewed as one of the world’s worst political leaders as his racial, fascist and totalitarian actions directly contributed to the outbreak of World War II which posed detrimental consequences on the entire world. From a second-hand analytical view, Hitler is perceived as an epitome of evil and the world still continues to battle the effects of the election of such a monstrous leader by German citizens. However, it is evident that the reasons why Germans supported Hitler and his Nazi dictatorship up to 1939 can be justified. Thus, as a result of his many favorable leadership qualities and characteristics (his excellent oratorical skills together with his promises to the German people, organization of the Nazi party and his intense propaganda), the Great Economic Depression of 1929 after the Collapse of Wall Street, the ineptitude of the Weimar Constitution, and ultimately the fear of communism, Germans continued to support Hitler up to 1939. By 1939, Adolf Hitler had become a very inspirational and charismatic leader as his great skill in public speaking had won over the loyalty and support of many German nationals. Hitler filled German people with a sense of hope that had been long lost for a very long time. Hitler attempted to please all aspects of life as he promised exactly what each group wanted. He promised to pay farmers higher prices for...
Words: 1607 - Pages: 7
...Their Eyes Were Specifically Watching Joe Starks Many people have the leadership skill, but not many put it to good use. Leaders come in various ways: best and worst. Some of the best leaders this year include Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, Angela Merkel, and many more (Dishman). On the other hand, many leaders lead with a more fallacious purpose. Some of the worst leaders encompass Mao Ze-dong, Adolf Hitler, Donald Trump, and many more (Butler). Although, power still remains a big factor of leadership. Most of the worst leaders had/have too much power and they let that get to their head. Joe Starks resembles megalomania better than any other. Although Joe Starks possessed many leadership skills in the book , Their Eyes Were Watching God, power influenced him drastically....
Words: 898 - Pages: 4
...Leadership Adolf Hitler is one of the most infamous characters in world history, known for his leadership in the Nazi Party and his role as chancellor of Germany in the early 1930s. As a leader, Hitler maintained legitimate power, however he could achieve it .Adolf Hitler was a strong leader of the German Third Reich by his extreme influence over the people of Germany. Hitler loved the German race, people, and culture. He was willing and did fight for his beliefs. Hitler had a vision, to return Germany it was before the world war one .The German population viewed Adolph Hitler as a strong leader, and someone who could lead their nation back to power and wealth. He may have been bad for humanity, but the German people viewed him as a hero. It has been debated over many years whether or not Adolf Hitler was a good leader for his country. Although his intentions were corrupt, Adolf Hitler proved himself to be a clever leader a great leader because he kept all of his promises and even today most leaders fail to do as they say. He brought Germany back out of The Depression, and he certainly made Germany the world’s strongest country, during the beginning and middle of World War Two. The German population viewed Adolph Hitler as a strong leader, and someone who could lead their nation back to power and wealth. He may have been bad for humanity, but the German people viewed him as a hero. It has been debated over many years whether or not Adolf Hitler was a good leader for...
Words: 379 - Pages: 2
...For as long as organized civilization has existed, humans have asked the same question of who should lead, and how they should do it. There have been a variety of answers: monarchy, democracy, aristocracy, a republic, or something entirely different. For European nations, the mid-1900s was a time of growth in one specific type of government. Totalitarianism, or dictatorships, became one of the most common types of government after World War I. Although the results of Adolf Hitler’s leadership in Nazi Germany are the most widely known, multiple dictators came to power before him. Benito Mussolini, Joseph Stalin, and Adolf Hitler all shared the same fundamentals when related to leadership. These three dictators were able to gain power in their...
Words: 862 - Pages: 4
...According to Hitler, the broad purpose of human existence is to preserve the fundamental principles of Nature, such that a human from a superior level cannot mate with another human from a biologically lower level. Additionally, he provided an example of how the product of such mating would produce the miserable life for the child because he cannot be with a person of a higher status, or even worse, to be with a lower individual. For Nature, it’s worse to blend the higher races with lower ones, because it would taint her work of creating high developments. In other words, the interaction of the distinct statuses would contaminate the blood for human progress by causing the collapse of great civilizations. As a result, Hitler states that the specific human who created the great culture should preserve his bloodline in order to protect it. The human would need to fight and abide to these laws of race for human progress. 2. What, in Hitler’s view, are the basic dissimilarities between Aryans and Jews?...
Words: 858 - Pages: 4
...technical aspect of warfare of particular historical time related to Alexander the Great, Arthur Wellesley, U.S. Grant, and Adolph Hitler. The mask of command is a work based on facts, real events, real people, character description, styles, and places separated into four chapters and conclusion. The first chapter, “Alexander the Great and Heroic Leadership”, describe the life, personality and its achievements. Alexander, son of Philip II of Macedon would become known worldwide as founder of Hellenistic world and the most famous general of antiquity what no other could be before or since. The second chapter, “Wellington: the Anti-Hero” examine Wellington’s military career in Britain during the period of his exile in India to its peak of career the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo. Moreover, John Keegan talk over Wellington’s numerous rewards and later achievements as Prime Minister of Britain. The third chapter, “Grant and Unheroic Leadership” is focused on military growth of Civil War General Ulysses S. Grant starting with the period of being solder to obtaining the position of commander of the Armies of the United States. Grant take place to become a fundamental supporter to the government’s military cabinet and was entitled as the eighteenth president of the United States. The fourth chapter, “False Heroic: Hitler as Supreme Commander”, is focused on Adolph Hitler, the Third Reich, and its tendency to world domination during World War II. The author covers...
Words: 2586 - Pages: 11
...throughout history gained power and leadership in several ways. As we have examined Napoleon from Animal Farm, and Adolf Hitler through the movie The Rise of Evil, we can observe the similarities between them in the way they have expanded their power and leadership. Napoleon and Adolf Hitler first started with small crowds in order to deliver their message of how to make their society a better place. As Napoleon used to speak at the farmhouse and Hitler at the pub, they both had their speeches around small crowds at first and the crowd began to enlarge as they spoke of what the people/animals wanted to hear about how to become a better society. Although both spoke what the people wanted to hear, yet there were some protesters. As Napoleon and Hiler grew to have more supporters, they also gained protection for themselves. In their cases, Napoleon had gained the seven dogs protection and loyalty, and Hitler had gained the army's protection and trust. Napoleon and Hilter had gained protection, yet they could not allow protesters to ruin their image to other people. In order to gain all people's attention and support, they both exiled whoever had protested against them. In Napoleon's case, he exiled Snowball, Boxer, and others in order to make the farming system work better. Yet Hitler had committed mass genocide to create a perfect race. In conclusion, we can see the similarities between Napoleon and Adolf Hitler in gaining power and leadership through gaining people's...
Words: 261 - Pages: 2
...greatness in Adolf Hitler as a mighty leader while presenting the tremendous return of Germany to power. The director uses a variety of film making techniques like aerial photography, use of long focus lenses, and camera movement. Riefenstahl applies aerial photography in scenes like the landing of Hitler’s plane. She makes sure that the camera floats through the clouds before Hitler’s plane comes in to view. As the plane hovers above Nuremberg, it casts a cross shaped shadow on the crowd that has assembled to welcome Hitler. The film begins with the only commentary prologue in it. The prologue consists of texts shown in a grey background. The purpose of the prologue is to state the purpose of Hitler’s visit to Nuremberg. Hitler purposed to evaluate the columns of his truthful followers in the city. Then, Riefenstahl directs the film to an eye catching introduction. As Hitler enters, the city, the Nazi officials conduct a welcoming ceremony. Hitler stands before a Mercedes Benz that is in a motorcade. During the welcoming ceremony, a large crowd that consists of women, children, and uniformed soldiers wave and conduct a welcoming salute to Hitler. Thereafter, a woman holding a small child on one hand presents a banquet of flowers to Hitler. Within the scene, flags embolden with swastikas flying on many parts of the streets. Through the film, the director shows that Germany had suffered many political and economic upheavals before the emergence if Hitler. During the early years...
Words: 1128 - Pages: 5
...creating great damage. Two villainous leaders in that time period were Joseph Stalin, dictator of the Soviet Union, and Adolf Hitler, dictator of Germany. These archenemies murdered millions of people during the time of their ruling. They fought to expand their territory along with their political beliefs. Both found themselves continuously fighting for the same territories. Stalin wanted to implement Marxism, while Hitler wanted Nazism, a form of socialism. Despite their enmity, they had parallel lives. Stalin and Hitler, the deadliest dictators in history, shared similar background, political agenda, and denial of crime. Stalin and Hitler shared a common distressing childhood that originated hatred and bitterness towards people. As children Stalin and Hitler were bullied. They...
Words: 649 - Pages: 3
