Premium Essay

Medical Testing

In: Social Issues

Submitted By ASballgal
Words 1557
Pages 7
Pharmaceutical Testing of India's People

Maira Watts

Tarleton State University
Abstract

This paper looks at the pharmaceutical medical trials and clinical drug testing on the people of India as the ethical perspective conducted from journals and articles provided along with a video that was shown to understand the perspective of what we were to analyze. The journals speak on the process of approval, laws that are in place to advocate for the people, and the overall plight of the subjects that sign up for the clinical trials. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Drugs Controller of General India (DGCI) are the two main controlling factions in the process to monitor and regulate the companies and sponsors that conduct clinical trials in India. This paper will discuss what happens to the people in the lower caste and what can be done to improve the situation of subjects that are part of the trials.
Introduction

Clinical medical trials are becoming one of the most prominently profitable industries in the world to come to a country with such a large population spread as India. The country is a largely technically adept workforce that has a great amount of population that demonstrate a variety of medical conditions along with the low cost of introduction into market which makes India hotbed for these medical trials. It comes down the problems of being ethical, is it right for the people, what ill effects will it have on these people, and do they even know what they are signing up for?
Arguments
The pharmaceutical industry is India's largest science-based industry worth $4.5 billion and growing 8 to 9 percent annually according to Corporate Catalyst (2014). There are over 8000 small companies that provide 70 percent of the countries demand for drugs. Entering into the market is not seen as a downfall for any company as India has a highly…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Stop Animal Testing in the Medical Field

...Erica Jones ENG 105 11-22-15 Stop Animal Testing in the Medical Field Lions and tiger and bears oh my. More like, monkeys and dogs and mice oh no. How does being poked, probed, opened up, burned, shocked and tortured all for the advancement of the medical field sound? Now think about all those things being done, knowing there is another way, which causes no agony, distress or discomfort to any living creature. Animal testing is a process or “tradition” that has been around for many, many years. The problem with this tradition in particular is that although it causes much pain to innocent animals and can be avoided, many choose to still use this practice today. Animals have been used as tools in biomedical research as early on as the days when Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle, were experimenting for their next scientific breakthrough. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients (Hajar 2011). Many research associations claim that animal testing has been used in almost every single medical breakthrough within the last one hundred years. Laws have been passed in several countries to make this practice more “humane.” In reality, these laws are the bare minimum and do not truly make a difference for the animals that are being used for experimentations. Animal testing in the medical field needs to dissolve and ultimately......

Words: 3596 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Position Paper on Animal Testing

...Should Animals testing be banned? English 112 02/19/2013 Should Animals testing be banned? Pharmaceutical industry has been able to do wonders in terms of expanding the life span of humans. This has been only possible by the careful and successful experimentation of different medicines on animals as they have rendered results for treatment needed for diseases among humans. Considering the experimentation for medicines on animals, it has been noted that an opposing party has debated whether the experimentation is unethical. There are a number of arguments which have been posed against and in defense of the animal testing. In the context of the debate, the position being disputed is that animal testing is beneficial for humans, despite being unethical, because it can help conduct different types of tests, and translate onto human lives. In order to present a justification to this position, following arguments have been posed by considering both sides of the picture: Animals are notably the best way to test medications as prior studies and empirical results have shown. With the aid of different animals including chimpanzees, baboons, ants, rats and other species of the animal kingdom, it has become possible for the scientists to find cures. These cures are not just limited to the transmissible diseases but also for influenzas and infections. It is of great interest that the heart of a baboon and other species of monkeys are rather similar to that of......

Words: 1494 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Animal Testing

...Imagine this situation: a new company is testing an eye care product on a subject. In the test, a substance is placed in one eye of the subject, with the other eye serving as a control. The subjects are restrained, preventing them from responding naturally to the irritation, and their eyes are evaluated after one hour and then at 24-hour intervals for up to 14 days. Some continue to be evaluated up to three weeks later. The level of irritation to the eyes is scored numerically by observation of the three major tissues of the eye (cornea, conjunctiva, and iris). The subjects suffer from redness, bleeding, ulcers, and even blindness, and are likely killed upon completion of the experiment. The subjects were in fact rabbits in tests called “animal testing.” Animal testing has raised huge debates worldwide that has raised many questions. How important is animal testing for us humans? Are the results going to be the same? Most importantly, should we ban animal testing for the sake of the animals? Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what is involved. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on animals. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works. Animal testing, also known as animal research, plays a crucial role in scientists' understanding......

Words: 1467 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Voices Not Heard

...Persuasion Voices Not Heard Seeing the face of a helpless animal can break your heart. Many animals go through torturous testing on a day to day basis that they cannot help, nor can they defend themselves. Since Ancient Greek times, animals have been undergoing cruel and inhumane medical testing that should not be done for the benefits of the human race. Animal testing is wrong because it is cruel, costly, harmful to animals, unreliable, and outdated. Animal testing has been around since the times of the Ancient Greeks. Between seventeen million and twenty-two million animals are used for biomedical research each year (Leepson). Many believe that animals do have rights, and there are many organizations out there to trying to ensure their safety and help them get out of the horrible treatments they endure. For example, the ASPCA, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, has been around since 1866 trying to curb the gruesome treatment of humans to animals. The ASPCA tries to prevent the abuse and neglecting of animals around the nation. They set up shelters for animals and they give vaccines and anything else they may need. The different types of animals being tested are endless; from mice to sheep, they all serve their own purpose in the medical field. Even though these animals have helped scientist break through some medical mysteries, it is still inhumane how they have to suffer in confined quarters. The CAFO, Concentrated Animal Feeding......

Words: 1391 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Animal Testing

...tested on animals. Animal testing is a phrase that many people may come into contact with, but are unsure of what it really means. Some individuals have very misguided notions of what they believe it is. They think it deals with torturing helpless animals. What is animal testing? It is the use of non-human animals in experiments and lab settings. Now that you know that those brands use animal testing and have a better understanding of what animal testing is, do you vow to stop using those products because you are strongly against animal experimentation? If you answered yes, then you’re also going to have to stop using Clearasil, Crest, Febreeze, Neutrogena, Tide, and a ton of other merchandises. In the interest of preserving human health and progress, government should continue to allow strictly monitored and regulated animal testing because it is the best alternative to human testing, is essential for safety reasons, and is beneficial to advancing biological and medical knowledge Don’t be fooled when products claim to be “cruelty free” or “not tested on animals”, because although this claim may refer to the final product, many of the ingredients have in fact been tested on animals. Animal testing has been and will probably continue to be a very controversial issue where both sides are passionate in what they believe in. Let’s face it, animal experimentation is integral to our everyday lives. “A survey conducted in the American Medical Association indicates......

Words: 1385 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Animal Cruelty

...Part IV Katie Schulz Mrs. Polski Modern Problems May 2, 2013 Introduction~ Animal experimentation began in the early 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with the Greeks performing the first experiments on living animals. Ever since these early periods there has been a search to answer the question of whether animal testing is ethical. This question is proposed due to the suffering of animals during medical experimentation. Veterinarian, Peter M. Henrickson, found this to be the case in his experience during a veterinary class. The research began on Rodney a shepherd mix. “The first thing we did was neuter him, a seemingly benign project, except it took us an hour to complete the usual 20-minute procedure, and an anesthetic overdose kept him out for 36 hours. Afterward, he recovered his strength quickly and felt good” (Henrickson, Par. 4). They then proceeded to do an abdominal exploratory, opening his abdomen and then closing him again. “This was the first major surgery for any of us, and, with inadequate supervision, we did not close him properly. By the next morning, his incision had opened and he was sitting on his small intestine. Hastily, we sewed him up again, and he survived. But it was a week or more before he could resume walks he had come to eagerly anticipate” (Henrickson, Par. 6). After Rodney’s slow recovery they once again put him under anesthesia. “We broke his leg and repaired it with a steel pin. After this, Rodney seemed in almost constant pain, his......

Words: 5691 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Animal Testing

... George Marcus Student Summary of Animal Testing Is Not Essential for Medical Research Much of today’s medical progress such as; magnetic resonance imaging, computer-aided tomography, vaccines and other medical techniques have not come from animal testing (Greek & Greek, 2004). Test tube research combined with the study of why diseases occur in different people and more funding for medical research is proven methods (Greek & Greek). The week of July 30, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration announced, that 37 experts that the FDA assembled have recommended lowering the recommended dosage of Tylenol. The panel also recommended eradicating Vicodin and Percocet. The recommendation came as a way to battle accidental overdoses of acetaminophen. Acetaminophen overdoses is the principal cause of liver failure in our country which results in about 200 deaths annually (Perrone, 2009). Over 51% of the latest drugs released between the years of 1976 and 1985 were eliminated or had a revised label to show harsh side effects unforeseen from animal testing (Greek & Greek, 2004). Physically humans and animals differ and our bodies process chemicals differently. The sustenance that humans and animals use can be dissimilar, reproductive systems are different along with the average life expectancy (Fano, 2004). With the physical and environmental differences between the species, research can give diverse outcomes in the testing process (Fano). The United States......

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Why Animal Testing Is Immoral

...Medical Testing on Animals is Immoral For my persuasive essay I have chosen to argue why it is immoral to do medical testing on animals. History of testing on animal goes back to the Greeks in the 3rd and 4th centuries, with Aristotle and Erasistreatus being among the first to perform experiments on living animals. I feels it’s immoral to animals because over 100 million animals are dying just to find cures for diseases (Hajar). However, the consequences of medical testing on animals is that most of the animals are not covered by the Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act is the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research and exhibition. Another consequence would be that most animal testing can mislead researchers with non -potential cures and treatments. The Food and Drug organization reports that just 92 out of each 100 medications that breeze through on creature tests come up short in people. This statement means most of the drugs tested on animal don’t even work on humans half the time. Next, "In the name of science", animal experiments globally are around 100 million experiments each year. Cats, dogs, rabbits, mice and other animals, no different to those we have as pets, are used in experiments. Animals are force-fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, stokes, cancers and ultimately killed. Several cosmetic tests commonly perform med on mice, rats, rabbits,......

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Animal Testing, Its Perks and Disadvantages

...Animal testing should not be banned Animal testing is defined as the use of animals in medical experiments. It has been vital in almost all major medical advances in the last hundred years for both humans and animals (Trull, F L 2013). The development of among many life-saving or lengthening treatments for example, treatment for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and the many vaccines for most diseases such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease are contributed significantly by animal testing. Most of the animals currently used for animal testing are lab rats that were carefully bred for the sole purpose of being experimented on, like lab rats and different species of monkeys. Thus, the ecosystem will not be disturbed and the scientists can continue experimenting with less guilt of killing innocent animals. However, there are people who object animal testing and request for the banning of animal testing, for fact that it is done involuntarily by the animals and they claim that animals have their own respective rights. Moreover, they proposed that the results from animal testing are not convincing because they are not accurate. Although results from animal testing has not been proven to be accurate, animal testing plays a huge role in medical field therefore it should not be banned because it has the potential to cure illnesses that may affect a person’s life; it also allows the creation of many important medical techniques and most importantly animal testing can save......

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Argument Essay

...Essay Animal Testing Twenty million animals are killed annually as a result of animal testing. Approximately fifteen million of these deaths can be attributed to medical research. The belief that animal testing is necessary in the development of medical treatments, prescription drugs, cures and vaccines, is a common misconception; test results are often inaccurate therefore using animals for medical testing is not only cruel to the animals but it’s also dangerous for humans. There are a rising number of scientists, doctors and healthcare professionals who are extremely opposed to medical testing on animals. It is believed among this group that results obtained from animal experiments cannot be safely applied to humans because 83% of substances are metabolized differently by animals than humans. Records show that less than 2% of illnesses found in humans exist in the animal kingdom; that is until scientists put them there. Most drugs available today were originally tested on animals; however, four out of ten patients who take prescription drugs will suffer from severe side effects. Over two million people are hospitalized annually because of prescription drug side effects and hundreds of thousands die. There are also the many prescription drugs that are recalled after they’ve been on the market for several years; this is a direct result of inadequate testing before FDA approval. Pharmaceutical companies claim to have positive results from animal testing;......

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

In Vivo in Slico

...SILICO! Four best practices help ensure a smooth technology shift to computer modeling and simulation for medical device and pharmaceutical organizations. By Thierry Marchal, Director Healthcare Industry Marketing, ANSYS F ollowing early engineering simulation adopters such as the aeronautic, automotive and nuclear industries, biomedical and pharmaceutical companies have started to widely embrace computer modeling and simulation (CM&S) to accelerate their product development processes and reduce the huge cost of bringing a new drug to market. (That cost could be up to $2 billion U.S.) Yet, some healthcare practitioners and organizations remain hesitant to adopt this unfamiliar approach and technology. Medical history shows that those who embraced true technological revolutions early emerged as new market leaders. Others, including some who were previously dominators, simply disappeared. The medical world experienced this shift a few centuries ago by following the example of Leonardo da Vinci, adopting an in vivo approach to understand how the human body works. In other words, researchers conducted tests and experiments © 2015 ANSYS, INC. on living organisms as well as cadavers. This led to tremendous innovation, such as the development of modern surgery, which saved many lives. Later in the 19th century, innovators developed in vitro testing, which was much faster than in vivo experiment but did not replace it completely. In these......

Words: 2091 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Fight for Animal Rights

...on animal testing by the federally funded Animal Welfare Act (AWA), the animals are still subject to inhumane treatment and we as humans have not succeeded in preventing numerous horrific and tragic cases against these animals. Even though it is argued that animal testing is the reason millions of lives have been saved, animals should not be subjected to medical or product testing. These animals are innocent creatures who are forced against their will into these experiments and it is up to humans, as the more intellectual species, to protect them and discover other alternatives for product testing. “We must fight against the spirit of unconscious cruelty with which we treat the animals. Animals suffer as much as we do. True humanity does not allow us to impose such sufferings on them. It is our duty to make the whole world recognize it. Until we extend our circle of compassion to all living things, humanity will not find peace.” (Schweitzer) To begin, there is much debate circulating that because mice and chimpanzee are so genetically similar to humans that it justifies conducting experiments and testings on these animals. Throughout history, countless incidences have been reported where human harm was caused by the use of certain products that gained approval through animal testing. Reports released from the FDA throughout the years continue to show that 92 out of every 100 medicines that pass animal tests fail in humans. In support of non-animal testing, there......

Words: 1295 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Animal Testing: a Reasonable Stance

...Animal Testing: A Reasonable Stance Animals can give us love and happiness when we are caring for them as pets, but what else can animals give us? Over the past century animals have also given us vaccines, drugs, and more that have kept our society healthy and safe from deadly infections, all due to animal testing. But are the welfare of animals something that should be risked to make our lives better? The issue of animal testing has caused an ongoing battle in our society that deals with both science and animal rights. There are those who favor it because it is allows for scientific progress, and there are those who oppose it because it is the ethically right thing to do. Both sides have valid arguments, which most people choose to side with one or the other. With a better understanding of each side of the issue, animal testing, we can conceive a credible truth. The complex issue of animal testing is one that should not be researched in a bias way. One must explore both and all sides of the argument to come to a valid conclusion. While I have yet to find a piece of writing that equally argues both sides of animal testing, the combined research I have done on both sides of the spectrum allows for a solid foundation for this discussion. These two stances on animal testing are opposite not only in position on the issue, but also in reasoning. The side for animal testing is reasoning on the means of science and research used to develop new medical treatment, while the side......

Words: 2983 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

...scientific and medical advances. It has both its advantages and disadvantages. “Moreover,” animal experimentation is an extremely controversial subject that has divided people into a group that either support animal testing or oppose it all together, and another that advocates the use of alternatives. There are many pros and cons when it comes to this subject. People all over the world have different opinions on weather animal lab testing is humane and necessary. Animal experimentation is unethical due to the practice of animal torture and suffering, animal choice and death of these animals. Animal experimentation (noun): any type of experiment performed on living animals, especially in order to test the effects of chemical compounds such as new drugs, cosmetics, food additives and pesticides (Animal experimentation, 2001). All over the world, people think differently on whether animal experimentation is an appropriate way to test medicines and products. Each year in the United States, an estimated 70 million animals are maimed, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt and killed in the name of science, by private institutions, household product and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Substances we use every day, such as eye shadow, soap, furniture polish and oven cleaner, may be tested on rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs, cats, and other animals (Animal Testing Facts, 2012,......

Words: 1471 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Save Animals. Say No to Animal Testing!

...Argumentative essay: Save animals. Say no to animal testing! Nowadays, it is a well-known fact that many companies test their products like cosmetics and medicines with animals before production to check their products ’safety and quality. A huge amount of animals are used in research purpose every year. Is it right for human beings to sacrifice millions of animals for testing purpose? Should animal testing be banned? Animal testing is a controversial issue and there is a heated debated about pros and cons of animal testing in society. People hold different points of view. Supporters of animal testing think that animal testing are critical to medical and scientific development. Opponents of animal testing think that animal testing is inhumane and cruel. It is generally believed that animal testing should be banned because it is unethical, unreliable and unnecessary. First and foremost, it would be interesting to see that supporters of animal testing argue that animals do not have feelings and rights. They are convinced that it is right to take animals ‘lives and make them suffer because they think human beings are more superior to other animals. They also think that only small amount of animals are being harm and kill each year. Actually, animals also do have feelings and rights, they are not deserve to suffer for research purpose. One should however, not forget that large amount of animals are killed because of us, there are actually 19.5 million animals are killed every...

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6