Free Essay

Ponzi Scheme

In: Business and Management

Submitted By idilia123
Words 1504
Pages 7
ESSAY CASE: ‘Ponzi schemes’
‘Ponzi schemes’ are scams in which investors are promised exaggerated profits (often short-term) from supposedly can’t-miss investments. If and when early investors are paid returns, the money doesn’t come from actual investment gains; it comes from new cash pouring in from later investors.
Initially the promoter will pay out high returns to attract more investors, and to lure current investors into putting in additional money. Other investors begin to participate, leading to a cascade effect. The "return" to the initial investors is paid out of the investments of new entrants, and not out of profits.
Often the high returns lead investors to leave their money in the scheme, leading the promoter not to have to pay out very much to investors; they simply have to send statements to investors showing them how much they earned. This maintains the deception that the scheme is a fund with high returns. Ponzi scammers promise windfall returns, counting on their victims to be either gullible or greedy—and sometimes both. The appeal of quick and hefty profits is precisely why some people fall for Ponzi schemes, even though they clearly fall into the category of too good to be true.
Charles Ponzi, an Italian immigrant living in Boston in the early 20th century, was a master at playing the gullibility-greed game. He was clever, yes, but more than that, he was charming and charismatic, easily convincing people to jump aboard his pie-in-the-sky schemes. He claimed to be taking advantage of foreign currency rates to make millions of dollars by manipulating postal reply coupons. (The coupons could be purchased abroad in foreign currency and included in correspondence; recipients of those letters could then redeem the coupons at U.S. Post Offices for enough postage to reply to the original correspondent.)
With great fanfare, Ponzi opened his postal reply coupon-based business front, called The Security Exchange Company, near Boston’s City Hall in December 1919. He promised investors a 50 percent return within 90 days on $10 to $50,000 promissory notes based on postal reply coupon exchanges. It seemed as if everyone wanted in—people stood in long and boisterous lines in the streets outside his office, eager to surrender their hard-earned cash. (Although the average investment was $35, many people happily handed over their life savings.)
In August 1920, Ponzi raked in $10 million, much of which he expended on an extravagant lifestyle (living in a mansion, flashing $10,000 bills, sporting a gold-handled walking stick, waving to admirers from the back seat of his chauffeured car).
QUESTIONS: Total points for this case: 15 points a. Analyze the above Ponzi scheme along the 5 elements of fraud with the victims being the investors. Conclude whether or not the scheme is a fraud. (10 pts) b. 1) Fraud: A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury. c. d. Fraud must be proved by showing that the defendant's actions involved five separate elements: e. 1) a false statement of a material fact, f. 2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, g. 3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive (enganar) the alleged victim, h. 4) justifiable reliance (confianca) by the alleged victim on the statement, and i. 4) injury to the alleged victim as a result. j. k. l. Analyze the ethics behind the scheme from the point of view of the promoter by applying the following ethical concepts: utilitarian test and the difference principle; generalization test; virtue test. (5 pts) 1) Utilitarian test and Difference principle - * Difference principle - Example: it is unjust to create salary differentials unless the lowest paid would be even worse off if all salaries were equal (e.g., they may be laid-off) * A policy must result in the greatest benefit for those who are least advantaged AFTER the policy is generally adopted.

Answer 1:

Fraud is a type of criminal activity, as "abuse of position", or false representation, or prejudicing someone's rights for personal gain.
Or, an act of deception intended for personal gain or to cause a loss to another party.

By analyzing the elements of Fraud, we will conclude at the end whether this scheme is characterized as a fraudulent action or not:

1) A false statement of a material fact: The Ponzi scheme promises high investment returns with little or no risk. In a business world, it's understood that every investments yielding higher returns typically involve more risks. This scheme encourage participants to invest as much as they can with promise of proportional return in the future, but the funds never come back as promised.

2) Knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue: This perspective is crucial to determine a fraud, and the Ponzi Scheme fits well in this analysis. When Charles Ponzi created this scheme in the early 20th centuty, he knew that the business transaction would be seducing new investors for promises that would never happen in the future. In other words, he knew that everything was a lying, and it would become difficult to increase recruiting of new investors, or whether a large number of investors ask to check out.

3) Intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim: This point of view is also important to determine a fraud, and when we analyze the Ponzi Scheme, we can clearly see that this is not a registered investment. In other words, Company's registration is important to provide investors to access key information about Company's management, products, services, and finances. This scheme does not provide evidence of firm structure of investment, and investors can rapidly identify that the defendant may want to deceive the victims.

4) Justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement, and injury to the alleged victim as a result: Business and investments are all about trust. People buy or sell and in the end the win-win sensation is the confidence that we made a good deal. The ponzi scheme uses good arguments of quick great returns that acquires victim's reliance in a misleading way, and in the end, investors are injured for not receiving back the promised returns of investments, nor the amount invested at the beginning.

In conclusion, the Ponzi Scheme is clearly a Fraud, and it has failed in all 5 elements of fraud analyzed. This action has the explicit intention of deceiving investors, with false promising of high rates of returns, and make investors believe that it is a great opportunity to make money, and in the end the scheme harms investors.

Answer 2:

"Ethics deals with individual character and the moral rules that govern and limit our conduct. It investigates questions of right and wrong, duty and obligation, and moral responsibility" (Shaw,3).

Analyzing ethics behind the Ponzi Scheme from the point of view of the promoter, by applying ethical concepts: Utilitarian test and difference principle; generalization test, virtue test, we can conclude if the tests fail or not, as follow the analysis.

1) Utilitarian test: Pass
The utilitarian test argues that a rational choice must maximize utility, subject to the other conditions for rationality, and the reasons for the action should have a means-ends structure. By the point of view of the promoter, the utilitarian test pass, as the ultimate for the promoter's actions is to create total net utility to him, and with the promises of high returns to the investors.

2) Difference Principle - Fail

The Difference principle argues that a policy must result in the greatest benefit for those who are the least advantaged, after the policy is adopted. The Ponzi Scheme fails when apply the difference principle, because it generates inequalities for the investors, in other words, this scheme does not work to the benefit to the least-advantaged members.

3) Generalization test - Fail

For the generalization test, it claims that an action is unethical if generalizing it is inconsistent with the possibility that everyone who performs the action achieves its purpose.

The generalization test fails when applying for the purpose of Ponzi Scheme promoter, as his action is not generalizable or consistent, as not everyone would be willing to perform the same act.

4) Virtue test - Fail

The virtue test primary argues that a rational choice must be consistent with who you are and why you are here.

In my opinion, the virtue test fails, by analyzing the promoter's perspective, because the promoter violates his primary purpose of trust, when he promises high return to investors, and it does not happen.


Shaw, Willian H., Business Ethics. Eighth edition. San Jose State University, 2014.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ponzi Scheme

...Ponzi Scheme Keller Graduate School Forensics Accounting The Bernie Madoff scam truly made history. Bernie Madoff probably would not have been able to prolong this scam without the continued help of the Accounting Firm of Friehling & Horowitz CPAs PC, who at last reported purported to audit financial statements and disclosures of Madoff firm for the last 17 years. Ponzi schemed to help Madoff by trying to go undetected because of Friehling deceiving investors and regulators by declaring that Madoff enterprise had clean audit records. Ponzi’s scheme enabled Madoff by falsely stating in annual audit reports that F & H audited Madoff financial statements pursuant to GAAP, including the requirements to maintain auditor independence and perform audit procedures regarding custody of securities. F & H purported that the financial statements conformed to GAAP and the Friehling reviewed internal controls at Madoff firm. According to SEC complaint, Friehling knew that the firm regularly distributed the annual audit reports to Madoff customers, and that reports were filed with the SEC and other regulators. The complaint alleges these statements were “materially false”. The SEC alleges that Friehling merely pretended to conduct minimal audit procedures of certain accounts to make it appear that he was conducting an audit, and then failed to document his purported findings and conclusions as required under the GAAP. If properly stated those financial......

Words: 1133 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...PYRAMID SCHEMES: Saving the network marketing industry by defining the gray by Kevin Thompson copyright of Advanced Advocates, LLC. I. INTRODUCTION In these trying economic times, responsible network marketing companies are positioned to offer viable opportunities for people that desperately need them. They combine passion for products with individual ambition to create a powerful testimony to the unyielding principles of free enterprise. With a fair compensation plan, an exciting product, and proper education, independent agents across the globe (also referred to as distributors) can leverage the power of networking to dramatically change their financial circumstances. Network marketing companies are responsible for providing its distributors with marketable products and compensation plans that rewards and motivates the sales force. Ideally, the rewards are designed to be commensurate with the work performed. With a good product and a fair compensation plan, !! the average person is given an opportunity to completely redefine their finances while operating a home based business. Distributors earn income primarily in two ways. First, they can purchase products at wholesale and mark them up for retail sales, thus earning an immediate profit. Secondly, they can form a “downline” by recruiting additional distributors and earn commissions on their sales to customers and purchases for personal use. Since distributors are......

Words: 8420 - Pages: 34

Free Essay

Ponzi Scheme

...Finance 1 22 May 2013 Charles Ponzi In August of 1919 a man by the name of Charles Ponzi was given an International Postal Reply Coupon from a friend. Upon reading the coupon he discovered it was purchased in Spain while it happened to be receiving it in Italy. Charles did some research and discovered that buying the Coupon in Spain cost a low amount of money, but that it could be traded in for more money in the United States. This discovery lead to Charles Ponzi creating a large scheme that if exploited correctly could allow him to acquire large amounts of money. However, Ponzi did not keep up with the International Postal Reply Coupons and instead had thousands of new investors paying him money which he then gave to old investors. Eventually, Ponzi's scheme was discovered and the entire entity collapsed, but not before making Ponzi famous enough to have the type of scheme named after him. His level of fame matched the amount for which his investors lost, about 20 million, or 225 million in today's dollar value. What is a Ponzi Scheme? A ponzi scheme is when a person swindles large amounts of cash from "investors" by promising high returns on their original investment. The scheme goes that a single person gets multiple people to give him/her money that they will in turn "invest" into something. The investees are never told what it is they invested in, just that they will get more money back this way then if they put the money in a bank. Within the...

Words: 987 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

White Collar Crime: Ponzi Scheme with a Focus on Bernard Madoff

...White Collar Crime: Ponzi Scheme with a Focus on Bernard Madoff NAME College White Collar Crime: Ponzi Scheme with a Focus on Bernard Madoff Most people, when they hear the word “crime,” think about street crime or violent crime such as murder, rape, theft, or drugs. However, there is another type of crime that has cost people their life savings, investors’ billions of dollars, and has had significant impacts of multiple lives; it is called white collar crime. The Federal Bureau of Investigation defines white collar crime as illegal acts which are characterized by deceit, concealment, or violation of trust and which are not dependent upon the application or threat of physical force or violence. Individuals and organizations commit these acts to obtain money, property, or services; to avoid the payment or loss of money or services; or to secure personal or business advantage (as cited in Barnett, n.d., para. 3). White collar crimes consists of such things as embezzlement, bank fraud, forgery, insider trading and investment schemes. This paper is going to focus on a Ponzi scheme, a type of investment scheme, and Bernard Madoff. Madoff is probably one of the most known offenders when it comes to the Ponzi scheme. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) defines a Ponzi scheme as “an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors” (U.S. Securities, n.d.). In another words, a......

Words: 1665 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ponzi Schemes in the Caribbean

...WP/09/95 Ponzi Schemes in the Caribbean Ana Carvajal, Hunter Monroe, Catherine Pattillo, and Brian Wynter © 2009 International Monetary Fund WP/09/95 IMF Working Paper Western Hemisphere and Monetary and Capital Markets Departments Ponzi Schemes in the Caribbean Prepared by Ana Carvajal, Hunter Monroe, Catherine Pattillo, and Brian Wynter Authorized for distribution by Paul Cashin and David Hoelscher April 2009 Abstract This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate. In several Caribbean states, unregulated investment schemes grew quickly in recent years by claiming unusually high monthly returns and through a system of referrals by existing members. These are features shared with traditional Ponzi schemes and pyramid schemes. This paper describes the growth of such schemes, their subsequent collapse, and the policy response of regulators, and presents key policy lessons. The analysis and recommendations draw on country experiences in the Caribbean, and in such diverse countries as the United States, Colombia, Lesotho, and Albania. JEL Classification Numbers: G18 Keywords: Pyramid schemes, Ponzi schemes, Caribbean Authors’ E-Mail Addresses:;......

Words: 2509 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme

...weak character who committed one of the crimes of the century, instead of simply telling the truth. His story is not the story of ridiculous greed but more the picture of our unlimited aptitude for self-delusion. Bernard L. Madoff was arrested in December 2008 for defrauding thousands of individuals and organizations of billions of dollars for over two decades. The part of Madoff’s investment advisory company involved in private-investment or assess-management was where all of his illicit activities were carried out. In fact, most employees had no ideal he was stealing from his clients. Madoff had perpetrated an outsized Ponzi scheme, a Brobdingnagian con game (Lewis, 2012). In March 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty of soliciting funds to buy securities and failing to invest the money. He used the money instead, as did the notorious Charles Ponzi, to pay returns to early investors and for his own benefit. According to the initial reports of the office of the U.S. Attorney, at the end of November 2008, Madoff’s investment advisory company reported that they held a balance of $64.8 billion. A government press release from the day he was arrested stated Madoff himself “estimated the losses from this fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion” (Lewis, 2012). Madoff’s crime spanned the world and involved tens of billions of dollars, all which seemingly vanished overnight (Avedlund, 2009). Among financial traders on the Street and within the halls of the Securities......

Words: 2162 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Madoff Ponzi Scheme

...Madoff Ponzi Scheme 1.Recent Developments * February 4, 2009 The whistle blower Harry Markopolos has told his nine years of warnings to SEC officials without making any action. * Oct. 2, 2009.Jeffrey Picower, one of the greatest beneficiaries of the scheme, was found dead at the bottom of his pool. According to the autopsy report, he suffered a massive heart attack while in the swimming pool resulting in accidental drowning * December 12, 2010.Mark Madoff, son of Bernard Madoff, committed suicide and was found dead in the living room of his apartment. According to his friends, he was hopeless of the burden he had to carry which made it difficult for him to rebuild his life. * June 29, 2012. Peter Madoff, brother of Bernard Madoff pleaded guilty of fraud and was sentenced 10 years of imprisonment. He confessed that he his actions paved way for his brother to continue his business. * September 3, 2014. Andrew Madoff, son of Bernard Madoff died of mantle cell lymphoma. Andrew together with his brother were the ones who told the authorities about their father’s fraudulent activities. * March 6, 2015. David G Friehling, auditor who rubber stamped Bernard L Madoff's Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to a year of home detention and an additional year of supervised release. * August 12,2015. Irving Picard, the court-appointed trustee in the Madoff case, has reported these recent developments: * We have recovered or entered into agreements to recover......

Words: 1263 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Ponzi Schemes (Tim Durham & Allen Stanford

...Summary of Tim Durham’s Ponzi scheme The alleged fraud is over $200 million. Durham’s main holdings were his leveraged buyout firm Obsidian Enterprises, Inc. and Fair Financial Services, both headquartered in Indianapolis, IN. When Durham acquired Fair in a 2002 leveraged buyout, it was a factoring company that purchased accounts receivable from businesses at a discount, profiting when the accounts were paid in full. It financed its operations by selling “investment certificates” to individual investors. According to the indictment, Durham and his cohorts immediately changed Fair’s business. Rather than using the $200 million they raised from investors to purchase receivables, they instead loaned the funds to themselves and their various business entities. When the loans went unpaid, Fair turned into a Ponzi scheme—taking money from new investors to pay certificates that came due. Now that the merry-go-round has stopped, it is estimated that over 5,400 parties—many of them small mom-and-pop investors—have lost over $200 million. The legal battles began with claims from disgruntled investors. In November 2009, the FBI raided the Obsidian offices in Indianapolis and seized its records. On February 8, 2010, the unpaid investors forced Fair into an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. Shortly after his appointment, the bankruptcy trustee filed suit seeking to recover the money that had been improperly diverted from Fair. The lawsuit language promised to prove a “fraud of...

Words: 1337 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...Fraud Schemes and Fraud Investigation Acc 571 Instructor: Dr. Ole Ruankaew Diane Phillips November 22, 2015 Fraud Schemes and Fraud Investigations The problem that organization faces today, are employee fraud. Many organizations feel that long term success of any company comes from the quality of their employees and workers loyalty. While during my research, I discovery that Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. has shown that organization have lost five percent of their annual revenue each year because of employee fraud. Every organization needs to have a plan in places for fraud detention. In preventing fraud in the work place, a good strategy for any organization is to implement internal control. These are plans; programs and procedures put in place to safe guard the company assets, and ensure the integrity of its accounting records. As prevention fraud is much easier than recovering losses after a fraud has been committed. This study will focus on the case of Stanford Financial Group Company fraud in which Robert Allen Stanford, chairman of Stanford International Bank (SIB), was involved in a Ponzi scheme. Stanford was convicted of orchestrating a 20-year investment fraud scheme in which he misappropriated $7 billion form SIB to finance his personal businesses. The Stanford Financial Group claimed to have pulled in retail, wealthy and commercial investors from 136 countries on six continents. Lopez and Kuhrt was aware of what Stanford ...

Words: 1323 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Enron Ponzi Scheme

...Enron Ponzi Scheme Enron Ponzi Scheme The Enron scandal was a corporate scandal that involved the American energy giant Enron Company based in Houston, Texas and the auditing and accountancy-consulting firm Arthur Andersen. The scandal was uncovered in October 2001. Enron Corporation was undoubtedly a giant corporation and in fact, some individuals suggest that it was one of the largest energy companies’ world over. It comprised of a multibillion corporation that employed several individuals and had various affiliations right to the White House. Enron majorly depended on external sources of credit to finance its operations (Loren, 2003). In 2001, the corporation collapsed leaving in its wake financial chaos and financially ruined lives and families. It emerged that the Enron Corporation’s remarkable financial condition thrived on institutionalized, systemic and intricately planned accounting fraud that was later to be referred to as the “Enron scandal”. From that instance, Enron has continued to become a very popular symbol and example of willfully orchestrated corruption. The collapse of Enron Corporation destroyed lives and shattered reputations, questions have been raised on how the fraudulent transactions occurred and who was involved. In this paper, all these questions will be investigated explicitly. The paper will also focus on the various ways in which the Enron debacle created an awareness of corporate ethics within the United States (Peter & Ross, 2002).......

Words: 1729 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ponzi Scheme

...Franzee Barlamas Ponzi Scheme Assignment Advanced Fraud Accounting March 30, 2016 1. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission a Ponzi scheme is “an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors.” The scheme got its name from Charles Ponzi who created the first ever Ponzi scheme in the 1920s. Ponzi manipulated thousands of New England residents into investing in postage stamps for a return of 50% in just 90 days. His guaranteed return of 50% was compared to the bank’s return at the time being only 5%. The New England citizens should have saw that as an immediate red flag and a too good to be true investment opportunity. 2. I do believe that this situation was a Ponzi scheme. It definitely fits the definition that I quoted in question one. In order to have any type of Ponzi scheme you need to have new investors. Over the course of 1996 and 1997, Wilson Energy Resources attained over 33 new investors. This quote from receiver Lane says exactly why it was a Ponzi scheme, “By making distributions to investors, the impression was created that many wells were profitable when, as a result of the expenses for reworking and maintaining the wells, there were no profits.” In a way this Ponzi scheme was like Bernie Madoff’s scheme. Both Madoff and Wilson were paying investors profits that they did not have, both parties promised investors returns that were not logical, both...

Words: 452 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ponzi Scheme

...A “Ponzi Scheme” is an investment fraud that involves the payment of alleged returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors. Ponzi scheme organizers often seek new investors by showing potential in their company; they entice investors to invest funds in opportunities claimed to generate high returns with little or no risk. In many Ponzi schemes, the fraudsters focus on attracting new money to make promised payments to earlier-stage investors and to use for personal expenses, instead of engaging in any legal investment activity. The system is destined to collapse because the earnings are less than the payments to investors. Ponzi schemes tend to collapse when it becomes difficult to recruit new investors or when a large number of investors ask to cash out. As more investors become involved, the likelihood of the scheme coming to the attention of authorities increases. The system eventually will collapse under its own weight. The scheme is named for Charles Ponzi, who became well known for his illegal techniques for using the Ponzi method in early 1920. He had emigrated from Italy to the United States in 1903. His operation took in so much money that it was the first to become known throughout the United States. His original scheme was in theory based on arbitraging international reply coupons for postage stamps, but soon diverted investors' money to support payments to earlier investors and Ponzi's personal wealth. At that time when the annual......

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Pyramid Scheme

...Pyramid schemes in albania essay 1- Introduction At the beginning of the year's 1990th, with the falling of the communism, many Albanians people went through the foreign embassy to left Albania and go abroad for a better life. They started to create a real income. In this time we have some mountebanks in the market which created the pyramid schemes and offered high interest rate. People invested in this scheme their savings. According to the data of the different official institutions, the number of the Albanian which invested in schemes is increased time after time. Deposits of these schemes take e big part of the GDP. This means that they have had an important role in our economy. Through this paper we want to give a general overview of phenomena of pyramid schemes and collapse that they afflicted. We will analyze the rise and favorite factors that encased prosperity of these companies for a long time and the way how they operated. Another point in our paper shows the impact and bankrupt causes that brought the fail of pyramid schemes. The last point shows the role of the institution that answered for minimization of crises effect. In our paper all the results will be accompanied with dates from different years. In the first chapter we will handle phenomena of schemes by focusing in three important cases a) we will give a short description for origin of schemes and the biggest schemes, b) in another case we are going to analyze the factor that took born of pyramid. c)......

Words: 3404 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

American Ponzi Schemes

...American Ponzi Schemes The unethical business practice of paying investment returns to separate investors, not from any actual profit earned from the organization but instead from their own money paid by subsequent investors, is called a Ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes are unethical because the process is fueled by greed and deception to swindle money from investors in which many times its victims can never fully recover. The emotional, psychological, and financial ramifications from Ponzi schemes have resulted in some of its victims even committing suicide. However, Ponzi schemes are not a new scam and have been around since the 1920’s. There have been several Ponzi schemes since then but two have stood out amongst the others. One of the most infamous Ponzi schemes, for its sheer size, was the $50 billion scam run by Bernie Madoff. The other is John Bennett’s scam because of its insidious nature of preying on nonprofit and religious organizations. While the American dream promises the possibility of success and wealth, some do not understand, or possibly ignore, the implicit ethics and legalities of running a legitimate business and earning honest profits. The Ponzi scheme gets its name from Charles Ponzi, a 1920’s crook who promised investors in New England a 40 percent return on their investment in just 90 days, compared with five percent in a savings account. Ponzi had planned to make money by taking advantage of the difference in exchange rates between the dollar......

Words: 2541 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ponzi Scheme

...Ponzi Scheme Corporate Finance A Ponzi scheme is an illegal business practice in which new investor’s money is used to make payments to earlier investors. In many Ponzi schemes, the fraudsters focus on attracting new money to make promised payments to earlier-stage investors and to use for personal expenses, instead of engaging in any legitimate investment activity. The returns are repaid out of new investors’ principal, but not from profits. This can continue as long as new investors line up with cash, and old investors don’t try to withdraw too much of their money at once. Ponzi scheme is named after Charles Ponzi, known as the Father of the Ponzi scheme and the infamous swindler, who paid out returns with other investors' money. Charles Ponzi was born in 1882 in Parma, Italy. Ponzi marked what would become known as the Ponzi scheme in December 1919. An alliance of international postal services had begun selling postal reply coupons after World War I ended. Each coupon was good for one stamp in the affiliated countries. This allowed the mail services to continue operations smoothly despite the instability of most European currencies at the time. That’s when Ponzi established the Securities Exchange Company, a one-man operation that offered coupons reflecting a supposed investment in international reply coupons (IRCs). IRCs are legitimately sold in the postal facilities in many nations, intended to be enclosed with international correspondence and redeemed for......

Words: 859 - Pages: 4