Premium Essay


In: Religion Topics

Submitted By srkamholz
Words 403
Pages 2
SFBT has a variety of techniques that can be tailored to an assortment of complaints. The most used techniques involve questioning. Other techniques include compliments and tasks.
Questioning is the main technique of SFBT. Because the solution-focused counselor is not interest in the past, the question of ”Why” is not asked. Instead, counselors will ask “When,” “What,” and “how.” There are several types of questions that therapists will ask: the exception question (previously discussed), the presuppositional question, coping questions, scaling questions, fast-forward questions, and the famous miracle question. Presuppositional questions emphasize the possibility of change and the client’s strengths. They are open-ended questions, but do not allow for negative responses (Murdock, 2009). For example, “’When the problem is not present, how are things different?’” (Murdock, 2009, p. 477). Coping questions help the client realize that they are more resilient than they think. An example of a coping question is: “What have you been doing to keep the situation from becoming worse?” Scaling questions are used in many ways. “The most common is, ‘On a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being the worst the problems has ever been and 10 being the problem is completely solved, where are you today?’” (Murdock, 2009, p. 478). Fast-forward questions are used when the client cannot think of any exceptions. The client is asked to fast-forward into the future an imagine what it would be like if the problem did not exist (Murdock, 2009).
The major technique of SFBT is the miracle question. Miracle questions are a way for the counselor to help the client what it is they want from therapy (Trepper, et al., 2008). Some clients have a difficult time conveying a goal for therapy. Ther miracle question is asked in a way to let the client know the counselor…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Solution Focused Therapy with Children

...Steiner I chose to do my first book review of the year on ‘Children’s solution work’, as I was intrigued as to how this modality can be applied to children. My practice to date involves only adults so I am very keen to adopt tools and tips to effectively talk to children in a therapeutic way. I was definitely not disappointed! This book clearly demonstrated how the Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) model can be applied to the nonverbal, playful and creative habits of children. The books extensive use of examples and case studies in various contexts and situations was instrumental in demonstrating the creative techniques and strategies for working with children without relying exclusively on language. I will use this book review to discuss some of the ideas, techniques and cases that really stood out for me with the hope that I may one day incorporate them into my clinical work. “There is good harmony between SFBT and children because there are so many similarities between how children think and make sense of the world around them and the assumptions and procedures of SFBT.” One excellent example of this is the child’s relative indifference to the “cause” of a problem, over their need/desire to “fix” it. I encounter this on a daily basis with my own children. I often find myself inquiring about the cause of their problems, feeling that by doing so I will gain greater insight into their thoughts and feelings. However, I notice that this line of inquiry......

Words: 1137 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Fifty Shades

...must see that.” “He’s had a profound effect on me, too. I just don’t know if I’m enough. To fulfill his needs,” I whisper. “Is that what you need from me? Reassurance?” I nod. I nod. “Needs change,” he says simply. “Christian has found himself in a situation where his methods of coping are no longer effective. Very simply, you’ve forced him to confront some of his demons and rethink.” I blink at him. This echoes what Christian has told me. “Yes, his demons,” I murmur. “We don’t dwell on them—they’re in the past. Christian knows what his demons are, as do I—and now I’m sure you do, too. I’m much more concerned with the future and getting Christian to a place where he wants to be.” I frown and he raises an eyebrow. “The technical term is SFBT—sorry.” He smiles. “That stands for Solution-Focused Brief Therapy. Essentially, it’s goal oriented. We concentrate on where Christian wants to be and how to get him there. It’s a dialectical approach. There’s no point in breast-beating about the past—all that’s been picked over by every physician, psychologist, and psychia-trist Christian’s ever seen. We know why he’s the way he is, but it’s the future that’s important. Where Christian envisages himself, where he wants to be. It took you walking out on him to make him take this form of therapy seriously. He realizes that his goal is a loving relationship with you. It’s that simple, and that’s what we’re working on now. Of course there are obstacles—his haphephobia for one.” Oh jeez .......

Words: 160421 - Pages: 642

Free Essay


...nAgPnF, sh,X  bush N 1.JAXF cadence N, utAr, YAl, aAvAj kA utAr-cYAv, alAp, bushel N 1.bQFs sr kA tOl  tAl bushy A 1.GnA, PlA h,aA, JAXFdAr cadet N 1.sEnk Ev Aly kA Ev ATF business N 1.kAm, kAj, &yApAr, u m, DDA, &yvsAy, rojgAr, cafeteria N 1.khvAKAnA, jlpAnfAlA, jlpAnGr 2.bAt, mAmlA, 3.mtlb, aT, yojn, 4.kAm m lgA honA,  cage N 1.EpjXA, kVhrA kAy m tprtA  cage VT krnA, EpjX m rKnA   bust N 1.CAtF, Upr kA DX, frFr kA UprF BAg characteristic A 1.Evf , EvEf , anoKA q bustle N 1.hlcl, DmDXAkA, hXbX cajole VI 1.PslAnA, bhlAnA, mFWF-mFWF bAt krnA,  , bustle VI 1.dOX Dp krnA cAplsF krnA, BlvAnA  , busy A 1.kAm m lgA h,aA, DD m lgA h,aA, u mF, pErPmF, cake N 1. k, EVEkyA, cpAtF    k PtFlA calamitous A 1.d,Kd, aApdg-t, m,sFbt kA ^ , but Adv 1. vl k calamity N 1.d,BA`y, EvpEQ, aApd, skV, d,K but Conj. 1.prt,, Ekt, calculate VT 1.EgnnA, joXnA, jAcnA, gZnA krnA, but Prep 1.aEtEr , uprAt anmAn krnA , butcher N 1.ksAI, GAtk calculating A 1.mtlbF, agsocF, -vATF, EbnA uQ jnAvAlA butcher VT 1.EndytA s vD krnA, hyA krnA  calculation N 1.l , EgntF, gZnA KA butler N 1.KAnsAmA, rsoiyA, BXArF calculator N 1.klkl , gZk, l krnvAlA KA  , Vr butt N 1.bXA pFpA, 2.kd,, EKlOnA, EnfAnA, pErhAs BEm calculus N 1.kln, pTrF , calendar N 1.kl , p A, j F, p Ag, scF Xr butt VI 1.Esr yA sFgo s V r mArnA  calendar VI 1.GoVnA butt VT 1.Esr yA sFgo s V r mArnA  calf N 1.bCXA, 2.EpXlF butter N 1.m?Kn, nvnFt calibre N 1.mAnEsk fE , b,EX, 2.bdk yA top kA m,h calico......

Words: 164153 - Pages: 657

Premium Essay

Therapy Models

...individual to undergo CBT he must be mentally ill, whereas an individual undergoing Alderian therapy and SFBT does not need to be necessarily sick as he only seeks for ways through which, he can feel encourage and reoriented from his past experiences. Therapeutic Process of CBT Therapeutic Goals The principal goal of CBT is to assist individuals attain a remission of their illness, as well as thwart relapse. Therefore, most of the activities that take place during sessions involving helping the client in finding solutions for real life issues and training them to transform his distorted reasoning process, difficult behavior, and depression (Corey, 2009). This allows the therapist to plan for treatment in regard to the cognitive formulation of the client’s illness and a continuous personalized cognitive conceptualization f the client and his difficulties. CBT also aims at educating the client about cognitive, emotional and behavioral regulation skills, which helps them to become their own therapists. Therefore, CBT becomes a more time-limited therapy to accommodate more patients with sessions for individuals with direct cases of tension and unipolar depression taking 6-12 sessions; while those with comorbidity, severe mental disorders and personality disorders taking 6 months to 1 year or more periodic sessions (Corey, 2009). Therapist’s Roles Just like in Alderian therapy and SFBT, the principal role of the therapist in CBT is to establish alliance with the client......

Words: 4333 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Literatur Review on Family Therapy Models

...communication and interaction directly affect human beings and how they function. When applied to families, Family Systems Therapy allows therapists to evaluate the parts of a system (family) in relation to the whole. This theory further suggests that an individual’s behavior is informed by and inseparable from the functioning of his or her family of origin (, 2007-2015). The second family systems therapy that I chose to research was Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) is based on the premise that therapists help the client or family focus and understand on the solution(s) to their problem(s) instead of understanding the problem(s) itself. SFBT ultimate goal is to create a solution based on the solution of the problem while empowering clients or members of the families to build their self-esteem and independence. In this type of therapy it is imperative that the therapist disregard their own worldview and adapt to their clients or families worldview. The goals for the family in SFBT should be definitive, small, positive, and important to the client or family (Cepeda & Davenport, 2006). Family Systems Therapy Family systems theory views the family as an emotional unit and uses systems thinking to describe the complex interactions within this unit (Carr, 2006). This theory suggests that the connectedness and reactivity found among family members makes the functioning of family members interdependent (Corey, 2001). The theory was developed from this......

Words: 1449 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Personal Model Therapy

...desired outcome of therapy as a solution rather than focusing on the symptom or issues that brought someone to therapy. Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) is based on a social constructionist thinking. It’s a goal directed collaborative approach that is conducted through direct observation of clients’ responses to a series of precisely constructed questions (Gehart, 2014). SFBT focuses on addressing what clients want to achieve by exploring the history and the beginnings of problems. The SFBT approach grew from the work of Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg, and their team at the team at the MIlkauekee Brief Therapy Center. Berg, de Shazer and their team spent thousands of hour’s carefully observing live and recorded therapy sessions. Any behaviors or words on the part of the therapist that reliably led to positive therapeutic change on the part of the clients were carefully noted and incorporated into the SFBT approach (Gerhart, 2014). Questions and compliments are the primary tools of the solution focused approach. Therapists refrain from making interpretations and rarely confront the clients (Gehart, 2014). SFBT is a form of talk therapy that maintains that change is inevitable and constant. Working together, the client and therapist working together create a vision of what the possible could look like. SFBT focuses on the future and to only rely on the past experiences as a resources. They focus on identifying the client’s goal s and strengths. ......

Words: 2922 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Moose Dragon Is Very Strong

...Therapy Solution focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) (Pichot, 2003) is a goal-directed collaborative approach to psychotherapeutic change that is conducted through direct observation of clients' responses to a series of precisely constructed questions. (De Shazer, 2007) Based upon social constructionist thinking and Wittgensteinian philosophy SFBT focuses on addressing what clients want to achieve exploring the history and provenance of problems. Solution Focus Therapy sessions typically focus on the present and future, focusing on the past only to the degree necessary for communicating empathy and accurate understanding of the clients concerns (Berg I. K., 2002) The solution-focused brief therapy approach grew from the work of American social workers Steve de Shazer, Insoo Kim Berg, and their team at the Milwaukee Brief Family Therapy Center (BFTC) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. A private training and therapy institute, BFTC was started by dissatisfied former staff members from a Milwaukee agency who were interested in exploring brief therapy approaches then being developed at the Mental Research Institute (MRI) in Palo Alto, California. The initial group included married partners, Steve de Shazer, Insoo Berg, Jim Derks, Elam Nunnally, Marilyn La Court and Eve Lipchik. Their students included John Walter, Jane Peller, Michele Weiner-Davis and Yvonne Dolan. Steve de Shazer and Berg, primary developers of the approach, co-authored an update of SFBT in 2007, shortly before their......

Words: 7795 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Selcting a Diagnosis

...Brief Therapy (SFBT), has been found to be an effective short-term approach to use in school settings (Birdsall & Miller, 2002 Piercy, Lipchik, and Kiser (2000) echoed this sentiment and stated “solution-focused clinicians need to know how to acknowledge, join with, and respond to client emotions as well as thoughts and actions” (p. 26). . Young and Holdorf’s (2003) study found SFBT to be an approach that avoids creating dependence, a significant requirement for attaining longterm success of an intervention. Thus, these studies provided support for counselors’ use of SFBT with students in school settings. The five questions of solution-focused method including (a) coping questions, (b) exception-finding questions, (c) the miracle question, (d) scaling questions, and (e) task-development questions. Gingerich and Eisengart (2000) critically reviewed all of the controlled outcome studies of SFBT through 1999 to evaluate the extent to which the theory has received empirical support. Of the 15 studies reviewed, 5 were well-controlled, and all 5 showed positive outcomes. Newsome and Kelly (2004) described an eight-week SFBT intervention designed for grandparents who are raising schoolaged grandchildren. They affirmed the approach offers “promise as a time-sensitive, goal-oriented approach with grandparents” (p. 81). Campbell, Elder, Gallagher, Simon, and Taylor (1999) proposed compliments serve as important therapeutic tools with the use of SFBT.......

Words: 4655 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Adlerian “ Encouragement” and the Therapeutic Process of Solution–Focused Brief Therapy

...Michael Foster PSY 100 Professor Carl Rogers Assignment 1: Written Summary of a Research Article In the article, Adlerian “ Encouragement” and the Therapeutic Process of Solution–Focused Brief Therapy the authors Richard E. Watts and Dale Pietrzak are comparing the overlooked similarities between Alfred Adler’s theories to the more current theories of the solution-focused brief therapy (SFTB) who give no credit to Adler. Though there are many similarities, the article focused on the concept of using encouragement by a therapist to their client to promote personal growth and development rather than on the limitations of a person. These same theories are very similar to the SFBT teachings of today. The article goes into detail sighting three areas of similarities between Adler’s theories and the therapeutic process of the SFTB. Those three areas are the perspective of maladjustment, counselor-client relationship and facilitating change. For the perspective on maladjustment each believe their clients are discouraged and without encouragement but not psychologically sick. In the case of the counselor –client relationship both describe the counselor-client relationship as the counselor instilling hope through encouragement. In the case of facilitating a change both parties encourage new patterns of behavior by accessing persons strength and resources. I agree with the authors finding based on the fact that the authors were able to document with actual statements......

Words: 469 - Pages: 2