Free Essay

Theology God in the Face of Science and Suffering

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By theejuliet
Words 1577
Pages 7
Juliet Le
THRS 200
Experiential Essay Suffering and Science:
The Possibility of a Loving God Before enrolling in a theology course, I was biased about the views of the possibility of a Christian God. I’ve seen far too many people say that God is their savior and everything they do is because of him, or for him. It was always to some far-fetched point, where I was unable to comprehend where their views came from. I never had the evidence or background to fall back on for a reason to have a foundation for the belief in God. Taking into consideration the numerous contextual readings from the arguments for the pros and cons for the existence of God, I still come to a conclusion that God does not exist in the human experience. Denis Edwards is the most notable author that I was able to relate to. By beginning with the nature of experience, we first encounter an individual and then we have an interpretation and understanding of that individual. Therefore, experience involves both encounters and interpretation of that encounter. We can have similar encounters, but different interpretations. This is where I was able to understand that the interpretive stage of experience can be biased, whether it may be because of emotional blockages, or unconscious motives. Edwards’s claims made me understand why I was unable to grasp the possibility of a God. Throughout my childhood, I was brought up in a Buddhist religion, never having even heard one thing about the Christian God. On the other hand, I have friends that have been rooted in God from childbirth. Therefore, I can now understand why people have biases, and how people come to have their views and beliefs in God, which I have come to understand and accept. Through these experiences and interpretations, I can comprehend Gods possibility of existence, however I still question the issues about a loving God in the face of suffering and science. The issues of poverty have greatly impacted my life because I have always been an advocate for the poor. Gustavo Gutierrez, the author of, The Book On Job, is a father of liberation of theology. He labored years as a parish priest among the poor of Lima, Peru. Realizing the existence of individual suffering and realization of social injustice and innocent suffering of others, The Book of Job, unfolds the mystical encounter with the God of creation. God’s possibility made it obvious to the character of Job, of the gratuitousness of Gods love. However, based off of Job, I did not find it convincing that suffering should still exist if God is present. Even through all of his hardships, Job never curses God, and suddenly he realizes that God is always present no matter what suffering he goes through. God does not just stand back; instead he is part of the suffering. The part I find compelling is that Gutierrez still does not explain why suffering should exist in the first place. I especially disagree with The Book of Job, when he receives all of his possessions at the end of his story. In reality, when one encounters suffering or hardships, and they overcome their struggles, it is not realistic to see them receiving all of his assets back. Currently, there has been a horrifying flood in Thailand where houses and buildings have been wiped away. Although they may be survivors, their house will not magically reappears after the flood is over. Job’s experience of God in the face of suffering does not have hard evidence to fall back on. Nonetheless, seeing this unfold we use this as a conversation to how nature and experience can be the medium of God, or the rejection of God. Richard Dawkins argument for the nonexistent of God is evident and feasible. Dawkings argues that behind the face of reverse engineering and utility function, how can their exist a loving God when there is not one answer to a way of maximizing life since there are so many contradictions. In fact, the suffering we see in the world is not suffering at all. It is simply DNA trying to survive. There is no problem to begin with unless we bring about the issues of a loving God into the equation. Again, I am able to understand the possibility of God through Edwards’ claims about experience and interpretation, but Dawkins leads me to understand that the world does not need a God, even if he existed. A clearer example of my opinion is seen in Dawkins claims about the watchmaker. Dawkins example about how the watchmaker analogy is a self-refuting argument. He believes that if complex things must have been designed by something more complex than themselves, then anything posited as a complex designer must also have been created by something even more complex. Carl Sagan also emphasizes on infinite regress, a question that no one can counter argue. Sagan wants to know why it is any more reasonable to believe that God has always been than it is to say that matter has always been. These two scientists have provided examples that I cannot refute, which is why I still hesitate for the 100 percent belief in God. On the other side of the story, there are scientists who have claims that science and God can go hand in hand. John Polkinghorne tries to argue that although science may tell us a lot of truths about our reality but stresses that data does not just jump out of the sky. It must start from some point of perspective. Polkinghorne speaks upon the epistemological gaps, or the gaps of knowledge. Ontological gaps are gaps within the world. Polkinghorne says that, our individual experience of moral imperative within us make us have the desire to hope which suggest that there must be something more at work than what science can explain. I can only agree with Polkinghorne to some extent. I am aware that as humans, we have the capacity to ask questions and seek answers in many things. Yet, I do not agree with his claims that, because of our desire to seek the truth, it must mean that God is present. I am a very curious individual that always asks questions. This does not mean that God is present just because I want to know the reason behind it. Furthermore, Polkinghorne states that by trying to point to actual gaps in nature, God fulfills those gaps and can act in a special way. I understand Polkinghorne’s claims about the link between science and God, but I still find it hard to believe. Although God fills these “gaps” in life in a special way, the definition of “special” is not defined in any manner. If God was the higher, all mighty, why couldn’t he have just left any gaps in the universe so that we were able to fully understand where atoms and molecules come from? Instead, it just seems like these gaps are an excuse to throw God into humanity. Similarly, Teilhard de Chardin goes by the principle of Sacramentality by seeing god in all things. Instead of God being in heaven, he is meshed within our world. Teilhard saw that science was a pathway of shaping who God is. Science with natural world led to a mysticism. I came to a realization that Polkinghorne, Haught, and Chardin both claim that God is grounded in our world, but their claims have no evidence. The gaps in the world, and Sacramentality are just terms they used to help fulfill their claims. It is not evident that he saw God in all things, just because Chardin had an interest in the natural world. I have played basketball since my childhood, but I never saw my hobby and interests as God. I enjoy hiking and the beautiful outdoors, but I do not see God in the trees or the dirt. Pedro Arrupe’s experience of miracles makes him finally believes in the existence of God. In my opinion, miracles are something indescribable and have no reason behind it, but I do not believe that miracles happen because of God. They are simply miracles because they cannot be explained, they are illicit reasoning that leave people in awe. Furthermore, Polkinghorne’s views on miracles he believes, is seen best in the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Yet, before we can assume that it is a miracle, we are skipping to the conclusion that Jesus Christ’s resurrection is true. We are just assuming that it did happen, and that it was a miracle. Piecing together many views of the possibility of a God in the face of suffering and science has been a positive experience. I feel that I am no longer biased about the views of the Christian God, and he does not feel oppressive because I now understand the experience and interpretive stages of it. It is still hard for me to believe that God does exist because even through the examples of the scientists that do believe in God, their claims are grounded on opinions and assumptions. Suffering is a major issue in the world today and we cannot leave global issues in the hands of religion. Instead, we should start implementing plans and goals to help end poverty. Like Sagan once said, God needs to leave incontrovertible evidence for his existence, like a crucifix looping the universe!

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Researach Paper Submission

...Christian Faith Rhonda Rigsby APOL 500 7/7/13 Target Audience The selected target audience for this paper is atheists. Atheists are defined as “a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of God or gods”, according to the Random House College dictionary. The first order of business within the atheist argument is that atheism is not a belief at all. Many Christians cringe when they hear the word atheism or that someone is an atheist, while some become angry, others consider it an opportunity to convert a lost soul. Statistics have shown an increase in atheism, which was predicted in the bible, and many tend to think that atheists all come from a scientific background and that as many as ninety-five percent of scientists are atheists. A study by Curry concludes differently reporting that seven percent of scientists are Christians and twenty-one percent are agnostic, while seventy-two percent report they do not believe they have a personal god.However, during this study it appears some skewness existed in the sense people were asked if they believed that God was affective and communicates with mankind. With this a part of the equation, most based their response on the fact they did not think God, if they believe He does exist, actually tried to communicate with mankind. At the end of the study, they concluded that thirty four participants actually were atheists by the above mentioned dictionary’s definition. They do not......

Words: 3152 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Problem of Evil

...THEODICY V. POSSIBLE WORLDS VI. THE ALTERNATIVE APPROACH VII. CONCLUSION VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY INTRODUCTION Evil is a universal problem with many categories. Philosophers like David Hume and Alvin Plantinga have attempted to explain the presence of evil despite there being a God. One can choose from many theodicies on moral and natural evil. Lately work has shifted to the notion of gratuitous evil. If gratuitous evils exist, is God morally responsible? Gratuitous evil and natural evil appears to bring the most plausible charge that something malevolent has occurred. This paper will critique various arguments concerning evil. Biblical Theology will show that the arguments are missing a key to understanding evil. EVALUATING THE TYPES OF EVIL The complexity involved in addressing evil persuades us to define what is meant by natural and moral evil. It is noted, by Steven Layman, that the distinction between natural and moral evil is not always sharp. It is Erickson who provides very distinctive definitions. Natural evil are the destructive forces of nature. Forces of nature such as earthquakes and hurricanes are out of the control of man, and due to the resulting suffering are deemed evil. Moral evils are those evils committed by free moral agents. Moral and natural evil are at time corollary. Layman suggests that among the losses of natural evil is the loss of moral agency. For...

Words: 3583 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Existence of God

...Existence of God; Science As Justification Submitted to Dr. michael chiavone Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For THEO 626 D02 By Daniel Martin Student ID: L25178504 New Orleans, LA December 12, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 a. Thesis and introductory explanation b. Historical development of doctrine II. Arguments for the Existence of God 3 c. Cosmological Argument d. Teleological Argument e. Anthropological III. Atheism Versus Existence of God 11 f. Evidence used to disprove God’s existence g. The believers evidence to counter IV. Conclusion 13 h. Summary of the arguments i. Applications in the church today V. Introduction The existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, immutable, monotheistic God has come up against enormous resistance from the beginning of time. Early believers such as Moses, Elijah, Paul, and Peter all had to demonstrate that their God is the one true God at times. These believers even encountered persecution and ridicule for holding on to these beliefs at times. Nevertheless the challenges to these early believers tended to be demonstrating that their God was greater than their accuser’s god or gods. At times, it was through the words of men that the God of the Bible was shown to be greater, and other times it was through the action of God in......

Words: 5137 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Christian Ethics in a Postmodern World

...CHRISTIAN ETHICS IN A POSTMODERN WORLD The Rise of Postmodernity Since Federico de Onis’s use of the term ‘postmodernismo’ to describe the Spanish and Latin-American poetry of 1905-1914 which had reacted against the ‘excess’ of modernism in 1934, (Rose 1991: 171) “Postmodernism” became very popular. It has been used in the fields of art (Christo-Bakargiev 1987), architecture (Pevsner 1967), literature (Hassan 1971), video, economics, films (James 1991), ideology (Larrain 1994: 90-118), theology (Tilley at al 1995), and philosophy (Griffin et al 1993). In trying to understand ‘postmodern’, we have to understand ‘modern’ first. According to Rose (1991: 1), there are many related yet different meanings associated with the term ‘modern’. First of all, Arnold J. Toynbee understands modern as referring to the historical phenomenon of The most significant of the conclusions that suggest themselves is that the word ‘modern’ in the term ‘Modern Western Civilization’, can, without inaccuracy, be given a more precise and concrete connotation by being translated ‘middle class’. Western communities became ‘modern’ in the accepted Modern Western meaning of the word, just as soon as they had succeeded in producing a bourgeoisie that was both numerous enough and competent enough to become the predominant element in society. We think of the new chapter of Western history that opened at the turn of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as being ‘modern’ par excellence because...

Words: 6541 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Nietzsche Critique on Christianity

...speaks immensely upon the idea of God/super natural being. At the time of Nietzsche's writings Christianity was widely practiced in Eastern Europe. Hence it was the main religion practiced by those reading who were reading Nietzsche. Before we can approach his critique of Christianity we need to understand the man himself a little. Nietzsche was born into a family who was extremely Christian, his uncle and grandfather were both Lutheran ministers and a majority of his family were devoted Christians. At a young age Nietzsche was exposed to life's greatest tragedy, his father died from a brain ailment and shortly after his younger brother passed away too. Fast-forward a little Nietzsche enters the University of Bonn as a theology and philology student. He later leans towards the study of philology, as his academic study progresses; this would later be the main tool for him as he uses it in his interpretation of the biblical text. Now that we have a better understanding of some of the more important events in Nietzsche life we can start evaluating his criticism on Christianity and God. One of the most famous quotes from Nietzsche's “God is dead”. Nietzsche states that there is no need for God in the world that we live in; God is not relevant anymore to anyone. For Nietzsche there is no need for a God, and while he understands the draw to the wanting of a God and an afterlife Nietzsche forces us to question everything we hold true and God is no exception. Nietzsche......

Words: 1614 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Philos and Ethics

...Design Arguments St. Thomas Aquinas was an important theologian and philosopher whose work on the nature and existence of God and his arguments for a moral code based on the ‘natural law’ God has instilled in the universe have formed the central teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. He sought to bring faith and reason together in order to develop the place of theology in the world. The argument from design finds its origins in Aquinas’ Summa Theologica and is the fifth of his five ways of proving the existence of God. Aquinas’ argument can be explained as follows: “The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.” Aquinas argued from design qua regularity. He saw the overall order in the world as proof of a designer: ‘this being we call God.’ Aquinas stated that everything works together to achieve order, despite the fact that inanimate objects have no mind or rational powers......

Words: 2677 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

An Analysis of the Open Theist Views

...Doctrine TH517, taught by Professor David Mappes. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF OPEN THEISM Abstract God is all knowing, unchanging, and all powerful. These are beliefs that are taught in the doctrine of God. These are beliefs that Christians live by and pass on to their friends and families. The Open Theist have come to challenge those beliefs. They argue God literally changes his mind, continues to learn, and is even said to take risks, (Sanders, 1998). The Open Theists are trying to challenge the Doctrine of God. This paper will dispute these beliefs and use evidence of scripture to prove that these arguments are invalid. Revelations 22:18-19 states,” 18 I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.” A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF OPEN THEISM An Analysis of the Open Theist Views Throughout history many people have struggled to come to a complete understanding of God. There are so many different Gods that people speak of and various religions that people...

Words: 2316 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Culinary

...forces determined almost everything.  While considering the effects of magnetism and static electricity, he concluded that the power to move other things without the mover itself changing was a characteristic of "life", so that a magnet and amber must therefore be alive in some way (in that they have animation or the power to act). If so, he argued, there is no difference between the living and the dead. If all things were alive, they must also have souls or divinities (a natural belief of his time), and the end result of this argument was an almost total removal of mind from substance, opening the door to an innovative non-divine principle of action.  Thales recognized a single transcendental God (Monism), who has neither beginning nor end, but who expresses himself through other gods...

Words: 17879 - Pages: 72

Premium Essay

Sociology

...Unit 3 Sociology; Beliefs in Society Different theories of Ideology, Science and Religion An Ideology is a closed set of beliefs that reject other views. A Belief is a framework of ideas through which an individual makes sense of the world. They are generally connected to a religion and based on faith with no evidence needed. Science is based on evidence, factual, objective and regarded as the truth. Religion is based on faith, not truth. It is a fixed view of how the world is and claims to be the truth. Theories of ideology Marxists believe that the ideas that people hold are formed by their position in society, and ideology is seen as the ideas of particular social groups reflecting their interests. The Marxist view is associated with the view that there is a Dominant Ideology (the set of ideas and beliefs of the most powerful groups in society – ruling class). Althusser suggested the dominant ideology was spread through a series of Ideological State Apparatuses (agencies [media, religion, education etc] that spread the dominant ideology and justify the power of the dominant social class). Gramsci developed the concept Hegemony (dominance in society of the ruling class’s set of ideas over others, and acceptance of and consent to them by the rest of society). Pluralism is a view that sees power in society spread among a wide variety of interest groups and individuals, with no single one having a monopoly on power. A Pluralist Ideology is the set of ideas......

Words: 6992 - Pages: 28

Free Essay

Dante

...introduction 'Earthly life passed before the half, I found myself in a dark forest ... "- With these lines begins one of the greatest and most brilliant works of world literature - "Divine Comedy" by Dante Alighieri. "This is a poem about the Dante," danteida, "and at the same time, a poem about a man who, descending and ascending the ladder of the universe, cleaned, and acquires perfect knowledge." People at all times sought to know the universe. And he could not. Maybe that's why his "comedy" to this day loved by ordinary readers and critics, and researchers are still hotly debated around her, every day, opening in this work, something new, not yet solved. "" Comedy "- it's poetry, which has become itself the judge, interpreter, and the key to unlocking secrets" - rightly remarked Alexander L. Dobrokhotov in his book "Dante Alighieri". The theme of my work - "The conductors and the twins Dante and their functions in the" Divine Comedy. '"I think for most of its first full disclosure should understand that in general it is a product. First, the genre of "Comedy" - a vision. The entire poem - a "journey to the underworld, this poet in a vision." However, it is worth noting that "in the" Divine Comedy "the central character - not an abstract" I "and Dante with all the features of his personality and life events of the past ... At the same time," Comedy "is a fiction that develops on the literary laws." Dobrokhotov draws our attention to the fact that "the combination of...

Words: 4891 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Theology of the Body

...Pope John Paul II’s Theology of the Body A Cliff Notes’ Version Introduction A. The Theology of the Body is the term used to describe the teaching of Pope John Paul about the human person and human sexuality given during his Wednesday Catecheses in St. Peter’s Square between September 5, 1979 and November 28, 1984. John Paul II says that these catecheses could be called “Human Love in the Divine Plan” or “The Redemption of the Body and the Sacramentality of Marriage.” B. Various scholars, in different language groupings, will generally break the theology of the body found in these 129 catecheses down into four main sections, others six. I think the most logical way to do so is to break it down into seven interrelated sections: 1) The Original Unity of Man and Woman as found in the Book of Genesis • 23 catecheses from September 5, 1979-April 9, 1980 2) Purity of Heart versus Concupiscence: Catechesis on the Sermon on the Mount • 27 catecheses from April 16 to December 10, 1980 3) St. Paul’s Teaching on the Human Body: Life according to the Spirit • 13 catechesis from December 17, 1980 to May 6, 1981 4) Marriage and celibacy in light of the resurrection of the body • 9 catechesis from November 11, 1981 to February 10, 1982 5) Virginity or celibacy for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven • 14 catecheses from March 10, 1982 to July 21, 1982 6) The sacramentality of marriage based on Ephesians 5:22-33 • 27 catecheses from July 28, 1982 to July 4,......

Words: 32011 - Pages: 129

Premium Essay

Existentialism

...or purpose. It is not the unfolding expression of Human Destiny or a Divine plan, or even a set of natural laws. The only meaning is that which we create by acts of will. To have a meaningful life we have to act. But we should act without hope. Acting is meaningful but it doesn’t create meaning that lasts beyond the acts themselves or beyond our own lifetime. You are what you do – while you are doing it – and then nothing. (Very depressing.) In The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus (pronounced “Kam-moo”) (1913-1960) describes life as a kind of hopeless, endless, uphill labor. Hence, the only true problem is that of suicide. Yet, he rejects nihilism; for the human being must fight and never accept defeat. The problem is to be a saint without a God. The last judgment takes place everyday. The human being must do his best,...

Words: 3244 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Inferiority Complex

...A PASTORAL APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF AN INFERIORITY COMPLEX FOR WORKERS IN THE KOREAN CONTEXT BY EUN-MI, HAN THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN THEOLOGY (PRACTICAL THEOLOGY) STUDY-LEADER: PROF. JOHAN J VAN RENSBURG UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE FACULTY OF THEOLOGY DECEMBER 2011 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Research Problem...................................................................................................................... 5 3. Research Hypothesis ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Research Objectives................................................................................................................11 5. Research Methodology .........................................................................................................13 5.1 The General Psychological Approach ...................................................................13 5.2 The Biblical Principle Approach...............................................................................14 5.3 The Systematic Theology Approach ......................................................................14 5.4 The Pastoral Approach ........................................................................

Words: 34912 - Pages: 140

Free Essay

Fascism

...4 March: City of God – Utopian Reader – include a little bit on it – 22 volumes in all. Christianity – Augustine – classicly trained greek scholar. City in north Africa. Story like apostle Paul – orginially a person who persecuted Christians – north African wealth family from – found enlightenment in Christianity. Once he joined became one of the early scholars trained in greek – regulized Christian theology. Influence on western world – top four or five who influenced. Confessions and City of God his writings…look up! What’s the purpose of improving human society – complex – why do it? Can human society be made better? Why bother, what is the point, justification? Takes effort, misery involved, change, unknowns, takes energy, takes risks. HAPPINESS – justification for improving society. What do you have to have to be happy? What is happiness – PHI 101 – happiness according to whom? Lack of misery; literally the elimination of misery. Secondly, food – gives pleasure – Happiness is lack of human misery and maximizing /pleasure and happiness. Bliss 24/7 – hedonism Epicureanism – eliminating misery and maximizing happiness. The justification of utopianism = why did plato want the republic? Justisifcation for improving human society among the Greeks? Poor always poor, always unhappy, death claims everyone - it is rational to maximize pleasure and eliminate misery. Do eternally accouding to plato. Opinions – 1. Relativism is a retreat in the 20th century.......

Words: 44275 - Pages: 178

Premium Essay

Classical Sociology

...Dustin Jones There were many social theorists from the period of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This period of time is regarded as the period of the Enlightenment. A few of the major figures of this particular “movement” were Rene Descartes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Immanuel Kant. They altered the way in which the social world was viewed and helped pave the way for other classical social theorists to explain the individual’s role in society. Karl Marx, Alexis de Tocqueville, Henri De Saint-Simon, and Emile Durkheim are only the names of a few classical social theorists who set out to explore the role of an individual within society. These men believed that Reason, along with the application of a scientific approach, would be able to positively change the world and break through to a new form of power and authority. Although the ideas and theories of these men give rise to far greater advancement in sociological theory, there is a failure in intuition, and thus, a failure of the classical sociological element. The first section of this paper includes an explanation of classical sociology along with an overview of the theories associated with some of the greatest sociologists of this time. The next section of this paper explores reasons and explanations for the failure of classical social theory and interpretations to why before-mentioned theories were compromised. The final section of this paper summarizes some of the conclusions drawn about......

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10