Medical Testing on Animals is Immoral For my persuasive essay I have chosen to argue why it is immoral to do medical testing on animals. History of testing on animal goes back to the Greeks in the 3rd and 4th centuries, with Aristotle and Erasistreatus being among the first to perform experiments on living animals. I feels it’s immoral to animals because over 100 million animals are dying just to find cures for diseases (Hajar). However, the consequences of medical testing on animals is that most of the animals are not covered by the Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act is the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research and exhibition. Another consequence would be that most animal testing can mislead researchers with non -potential cures and treatments. The Food and Drug organization reports that just 92 out of each 100 medications that breeze through on creature tests come up short in people. This statement means most of the drugs tested on animal don’t even work on humans half the time.
Next, "In the name of science", animal experiments globally are around 100 million experiments each year. Cats, dogs, rabbits, mice and other animals, no different to those we have as pets, are used in experiments. Animals are force-fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, stokes, cancers and ultimately killed. Several cosmetic tests commonly perform med on mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs include: skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed on shaved skin or dripped into the eyes without any pain relief. Repeated force-feeding studies that last weeks or months, to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards. Generally denounced "deadly dosage" tests, where creatures are compelled to swallow a lot of a test synthetic to figure out what measurements causes’ demise. It's wrong that animals have to suffer while scientists conduct experiments, it’s immoral and just down right wrong every animal has the right to live a normal life.
However, I believe that you could use alternative tests to study human tissues on statistics and other stuff instead of testing on animals would be the right way to go. The anxiety consider that creatures continue labs can influence examinations, making the outcomes negligible. Animals have as much right to life as any human. The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, food ingredient, “drug for erectile dysfunction or pesticide” ("Top Five Reason to Stop Animal Testing) that comes at taking a life of an animal. Poisoning, shocking, burning and killing animals is all in a day’s work for sciences research. If there acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be consider felonies. Many and many animals suffer and die each and every day with little or no protection from cruelty. For example a recent case in New Jersey “Beagles were left alone in a building to die of starvation after testing was complete” ("What Are the Animal Testing Pros and Con"). Animals are just the same as humans they have the right to live even though they can’t speak they should have the same right as every human on this planet.
Furthermore, the medical benefits of testing on animals is that we wouldn’t have drugs like penicillin and insulin. We also have things like asthma, breast cancer, blood transfusions, and tuberculosis. Penicillin was tested on eight different mice that had a lethal dosage of 110 million streptococci microscopic organisms. Four out of the eight mice were injected with penicillin lived the other four that were not injected had died. The other drug that was tested on animals that human use today is insulin. Doctors have realized that removing a pancreas from any living animal produced diabetes, however in 1921 "Canadian doctor Frederick Banting along with student Charles Best, managed to extract insulin" ("Medical Benefits"). After they have extracted the insulin they injected the extract into a diabetic dog that was close to death, insulin had restored the dog’s health to normal. The only side effect that was caused by the extraction was high fever.
In conclusion, I believe that many of that animals out there are harmed and should not be in any way used for medical testing. Taking hundred plus animal lives every day is downright immoral and wrong. Every animal has the right to live a normal and healthy life. Not kept in a lab for experiments.

Work Cited Page
Hajar, Rachel. "Formats." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 July 5. Web. 8 Feb. 2014.
"Medical Benefits." Speaking of Research. Web. 14 Feb. 2014.
"Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing." PETA Top Five Reasons to Stop Animal Testing Comments. Web. 8 Feb. 2015
“What Are The Animal Testing Pros and Cons.” Animal Testing Pros and Cons. Web. 8 Feb. 2015.