Premium Essay

Why the North Won

In:

Submitted By frogsfan
Words 479
Pages 2
There were 22 million people in the North compared with only about 9 million in the South, which of those only a little over half were white. The North had a much greater industrial capacity with most of the factories being there. The Confederacy hoped to make up for its lack of materials by trading with Europe, but the Union used its naval strength to impose an increasingly tight blockade. The Union was aided even more by the fact that four slave states, Delaware, Missouri, Maryland and Kentucky, remained loyal to the Union. Nor were all the people within the 11 Confederate states committed to the Confederate cause. Slaves were also a potential fifth column. Throughout the war there was a steady flow of blacks fleeing to Union armies. The North converted first their labor and eventually their military manpower into a Union asset.
The Confederacy did have important advantages though. Southerners were defending their own land and homes, which may have encouraged them to fight that much harder than Northerners, who were fighting more for the preservation of the Union. In 1861 most Southerners were confident that, man for man, they were better soldiers than Northerners. The South placed more emphasis on martial virtues than the North. In 1860 most of the military colleges in the USA were in slave states. The elite of the nation’s generals had all been Southerners. Most military experts thought that farmers, who knew how to ride and shoot, made better soldiers than industrial workers. This proved to be wrong with the emergence of Ulysses S. Grant. Grant, at the beginning of his military career, wasn't what would be an outstanding leader that he would be recognized as at the end of his military career. He served very well in the Mexican War but after that was assigned to an insignificant post and turned to drinking and was forced to resign his commission. He worked

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Why the North Won the Civil War

...Why the North Won the War | There are several factors that contributed to the downfall of the South in its ill-fated pursuit of victory over the North in the Civil War – not the least of which was arrogance. This arrogance was widely on display as the southern way of life supported an antiquated belief system that not only prejudiced them against people of color, but anyone who adopted a separate philosophy. If the Confederacy fails, there should be written on its tombstone: Died of a Theory. -Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America "In all history, no nation of mere agriculturists ever made successful war against a nation of mechanics. . . .You are bound to fail" -Union officer William Tecumseh Sherman to a Southern friend. The North also had undisputable advantages in moving soldiers and equipment. As they held control of 20,000 miles of railroad track while the South possessed half that total. In order to continue to supply a great deal of soldiers with food and equipment, the South needed to protect this valuable asset while capturing and destroying the North’s access to this lifeline. In the end, they accomplished neither. The simple truth remained – the South was not prepared to combat for any extended period of time. Their soldiers will to fight shrank as belts tightened and food ran out. ...

Words: 720 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fredrickson: Why The North Won The Civil War

...sources is that the Fredrickson argued that there are several explanations of “why the North won”, but “The problem with most of them os not that they are wrong but that there are partial or incomplete…”and McPherson argued that North won the war because of all of the advantages that they had in resources, manpower, and leadership. McPherson believed out off the explanations the “loss of the will to fight” for the South is what defeated them. He stated, “Defeat causes demoralization and loss of will; victory pumps up morale and the will to win.” Both Fredrickson and McPherson brought up that the North had the “advantages in manpower, resources, and industrial capacity.” Looking at the facts North had advantage in population of 2:1,...

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War

...of the early United States won the Civil War, slavery would still be part of our society. But thanks to the overpowering Northern half of the U.S., the South had no chance of winning the Civil War and slavery was abolished. To start off, the North was more motivated and passionate about what they were fighting for through and through. The North had President Abraham Lincoln leading them and with his strong leadership skills and power, he was able to lead the North to victory against the South and abolish slavery. If Lincoln decided to lose the war, to back off his troops and allow the South to win, history would be tremendously different than it is now. But because of the power of the people and the determination of Lincoln to win, the North was able to win against the crippling South. The cause of the war escaped the South. They lacked the moral center that the North had. War got serious and they lost their faith in what they were fighting for because it didn’t apply to them directly. It didn’t speak to them and convince them slavery was still worth fighting for....

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Soundness of an Argument

...state the premises (i.e., reasons) that supposedly support each separate conclusion. Premiss 1: If the North won the Civil War, then he slaves were freed Premiss 2: The North won the Civil War Premiss 1: If the South won the Civil War, then he slaves were freed Premiss 2: The South won the Civil War Premiss 1: All seniors are talented (F) Premiss 2: All talented people are ugly (F) Premiss 1: All ugly people are seniors (F) Premiss 2: All seniors are insightful (F) Premiss 1: All ugly people are insightful (T) Premiss 2: All talented people are ugly (F) Symbolize each argument (Remember: a universal statement is a statement that makes a claim about all members of its group. The key to translating All ugly people are seniors in the exercise above, for example, is to interpret the universal statement as the conditional statement If it is a ugly person, then it is a senior [for every member of its subject class: ugly people]).  If people were free, then they were a slave  If people were free, then they were a slave  If it is an ugly person, then it is a senior.  If it is an insightful person, then they are ugly.  If it is an insightful person, then they are talented. Are these deductive or inductive arguments? These are deductive arguments as they attempt to follow the deductive logical form Are the arguments valid? (Why or why not?) Hint: Refer to the Intellectual Standards of Validity in analysis and assessment. The arguments are...

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Did The Civil War Change The Future

...A Fight That Changed The Future In 1861 the deadliest and bloodiest war of all time began. The war was a battle between the North (union soldiers) and the South (confederate soldiers). Many people thought this war would be a short war, but it lasted 4 years. This war was the Civil War and it is an important event in history. Many people say the civil war was over states rights, but a majority of people say it was over slavery. Slavery was said to be the #1 conflict between the North and the South in the 1860’s (Guelzo 1). People from the North were being used as slaves in the south. The south liked/ wanted slaves, but the North did not agree, which is why the country was divided (Luce 1). Fifteen out of 34 of the states were slave states...

Words: 1142 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Cause of Civil War

...difference between the North and South. The actions of the Democratic politicians from the South and Republican politicians from the North kept the conflict between the states at the center of the political debate for years and made the war inevitable. Key political causes of the civil war include the acts congress passed, the split that happened throughout the years between congress, and most importantly the election in 1860 that elected Abraham Lincoln as president. Congress, throughout the years since America won independence passed laws they believed would help their nation. But as slavery became more of a problem in the nation, acts passed by congress became more important and affected the outcome of the American nation and its citizens much greater. Congress passed many acts throughout the years leading to the Civil War, but some very important ones that both held off the civil war and pushed the civil war are the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Connecticut Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas – Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 after Missouri requested in 1819 to be part of the Union as a slave state. Missouri’s request may have seemed like a simple request but this small request shocked the whole nation and caused an outrage. This is because America’s delegate balance of slave and Free states was being threatened. If Missouri was passed as a slave state then slave states would out number Free states and this made the North furious and caused...

Words: 2858 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Civil War

...HIST101 - Instructor- Wonda Sikes 7/27/14 U.S History to 1877 The Civil War By: Anthony Green I chose to do a picture of the American Civil War. The picture I chose is of a battle between the union and the confederacy or north and south. The picture shows how severe the war truly was between the two sides. The north is running up a hill while the south is running down. Both sides have guns and swords drawn, and gun smoke everywhere, people dying on both sides. Horses getting shot, flags waving, and everybody seems to be yelling and screaming. Cannons getting shot looks like it might rain, I feel that it depict a deep time of depression, truth, but most of all anger, anger for the south to take control of the north, and anger for the north to take control of the south. In 1860 Abraham Lincoln ran for president. The republicans lead by Lincoln opposed to the expansion of slavery into the United States during the presidential election. Lincoln won the election, and then on march4th 1861 he was officially inaugurated. But before his inauguration seven of the cotton based slave states formed the confederacy. The first six to secede had the greatest number of slaves in their community, almost fifty percent for the six states. The outgoing democrats and the incoming republicans rejected secession as illegal. At Abraham Lincoln’s inaugural...

Words: 840 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

His115 Final

...By Shane Iverson 12/23/2012 HIS/115 The Civil war was a huge war fought over territories and freedom. Over 600,000 Americans lost their lives in this war, with the North having been more effected. The North had no regrets about the war. They were satisfied that the slaves were free, and the Union was preserved. The South began to glorify what they called “the lost cause”. The generals from the south became mythic heroes. As they looked back at the war they almost regretted surrendering. Historian Shelby Foote left us with this note. “Any understanding of this nation has to be based . . . on an understanding of the Civil War. . . . The Civil War defined us as what we are, and it opened us to being what we became, good and bad things. It is very necessary if you’re going to understand the American character in the 20th century to learn about this enormous catastrophe of the mid-19th century. It was the crossroads of our being”. What does this tell us about the United States? What did Foote mean when he spoke these words? We may also think to ourselves. Why didn’t the South win? There leaders were supposedly brilliant and they lost fewer men then the North, right? What did Historian Shelby Foote mean in his quote above? He is saying that it is necessary to learn about this huge catastrophe that happened in the mid 19th century before judging Americans or even becoming one. This is what makes us...

Words: 735 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Lets End the Civil War

...are still participations in the reengagement of the civil war and some of the actors still hope that the civil war will be restored. Harry golden thinks that the Americans see the centennial more as a celebration of the civil war, than a centennial. And that is why one of the main themes in the article is misunderstanding. It is a misunderstanding between the south and their view of the centennial. He thinks that the southern people believe that the centennial is more real than just a reengagement. Another theme in this story is how the view of the war is a hundred years after, which leads us to the reason why he wrote the article; the hundred years anniversary. The writer Harry Golden is a man from the northern part of America, who is born and educated in the same part; this clearly gives him a non-objective view on the civil war. The article is written from his view and therefore it’s not a reliable article, it only gives us his opinion on the Civil War centennial. There is no doubt that this article is written from the Northern part of the America’s point of view, which evidenced clearly in the following quotes. (p.121 ll. 11) “It was the war the North won because the north realized it was an industrial war – a war won by superior advantage in men, materiel, transportation and logistics” this quote makes it very clear, that the article has been written from a northern point of view, because he describes the northern men as “superior advantaged” which, probably wouldn’t be the...

Words: 1040 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Abraham Lincoln's Background: The Republican Party

...that was created to help free slaves in the western areas in 1834. The reason why the Whig Party was formed into the Republican party was because the Whig Party didn’t work out so well and they had a lot of arguments. .The Republicans gained a lot of supporters from the North to help increase their chances of presidency election. Because of their, John C. Fremont , from the Republican Party, won their first election for President in 1856. Later in November 1860, Abraham Lincoln, which was also from the Republican Party, won presidency over the Democratic Party to decrease the level of threats toward salves. In...

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Jim Valvano: An Effective Basketball Player

..."A person really doesn't become a whole, until he becomes something bigger than himself." -Jim Valvano, the person who I think is the most effective citizen of the 20th century. Jim Valvano started out as a basketball player for Rutgers University, he played as a point guard. After his basketball playing career he became a successful basketball coach for North Carolina. He coach North Carolina to the NCAA championship game and won in the last couple of seconds with a dunk. After he coached North Carolina he became a broadcaster for ESPEN and ABC Sports. He won the Arthur Ashe Courage and Humanitarian Award and after his amazing speech for that award sadly a month later he passed away of bone cancer. One of his accomplishments in his life time is that after he passed some people fulfilled his dream of starting a foundation towards cancer research. Two other accomplishments in Jim Valvano's life are when he won the the Arthur Ashe Courage and Humanitarian Award in 1993, and when he won the 1983 NCAA championship....

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why, in the Years 1961-68 Were Both Kennedy and Johnson Unable to Avoid Increasing Involvement in Vietnam?

...Why, in the years 1961-68, were both Kennedy and Johnson unable to avoid increasing involvement in Vietnam? The United States’ involvement in the Vietnam War proved to be the most controversial episode in American history. There are many influences why the USA stayed so closely involved with Vietnam, including strategic hamlets, secretaries and personal beliefs. In the election campaign of 1960 Kennedy promoted himself as being tough on communism. He supported the Truman Doctrine, and believed in the ‘domino theory’, the idea that communism would inevitably spread from North Vietnam to Laos and Cambodia. His slogan was “Vietnam is the place”, which helped him gain support. Kennedy's failures at the Vienna summit in 1961, and the Bay of Pigs fiasco in Cuba, forced him to stiffen his position on Vietnam, not wanting to lose American citizens support. There was the curse of appeasement, as Eisenhower had not done enough during his time as President. Kennedy needed to prove himself as he was a democrat. The last democrat who was President lost the Korea War. He also had a fear of attack because of this by the republicans, as US citizens thought he was soft on communism. He was seen as a friend of Vietnam. In 1961, Robert McNamara was the Secretary of Defence as was known as a “Hawk”. This meant he was for the war and for military solutions. He was a close confidant with both Kennedy and Johnson, and strongly believed in the USA’s commitment to South Vietnam. He was a liberal intellectual...

Words: 921 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Us Involvement in Vietnam

...was the background to the Vietnam War? • Vietnam was ruled by the French till 1954. Then it was divided into two countries. • The communist ruler of North Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, wanted to unite the North and South under his control. He supported the Vietcong in South Vietnam. • President Diem ruled South Vietnam. He was strongly anti-communist, but was also a brutal and unpopular leader. Who were the Vietcong? • The Vietcong (or the National Liberation Front) were the communist guerrilla soldiers fighting to overthrow President Diem and his government. • By 1964, there were over 100,000 Vietcong in the South and they were killing thousands of South Vietnamese officials every year. Diem's army could not get rid of them. Why did the Americans get involved? • America said it wanted to ‘save’ the South Vietnamese people from the evils of communism. • But, remember that this was the time of the Cold War. Americans were obsessed with stopping Communism, both abroad and at home in the USA. • The Americans wanted to "contain" (stop) the spread of Communism in the world (the Truman Doctrine). The USA wanted to support non-Communist governments which were threatened by Communists. It knew that the USSR and China, both Communist-ruled, were sending aid to Communist North Vietnam. • The Americans also believed in the "domino theory". If Vietnam became Communist, they were sure that neighbouring countries (e.g. Laos, Cambodia...

Words: 3309 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Analyzing William Jennings Bryan's Cross Of Gold Speech

...improve the financial situation. In 1896, William Jennings Bryan had delivered a speech known as the Cross of Gold, supporting the “Free Silver” and bimetallism. Bryan’s audience reaction varied greatly, from hating Bryan to supporting Bryan for president. The speech had illuminated several important topics, agrarian support, and the election of 1986. Bryan’s Cross of Gold touches on several topics. Manifest Destiny, it is destiny for the United States are to spread throughout the continent and make it agrarian. Misunderstanding, the North believes that the South is disturbing their business interest, however the South’s business interests are being disrupted by the ever changing prices in crops. Unity,...

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Union War

...The Union War “Without an appreciation of why loyal citizens believed a Union that guaranteed democratic self-government was worth great sacrifice, no accurate understanding of the Civil War era was possible” (Gallagher). I agree with this statement by Gallagher because if it wasn’t for the decisions and executions of the Union I am not sure if I would be living in a democratic, free society today. In The Union War, Gallagher “offers a companion volume that extends his manifesto against hindsight, what Gallagher calls the ‘Appomattox syndrome,’ to histories of the Union” (Gallagher, 79). According to Gallagher, researchers who work backward from emancipation and Reconstruction have expanded northern devotion to race, slavery, and abolition while complicating loyal Americans’ major war aim, the Union. The above quote stated by Gary Gallagher is one of the main causes as to why the North won the Civil War because with the joining of citizens who wanted to fight for their democratic government, it gave the Union more soldiers that wanted to fight than the Confederates. They won the Civil War simply because they had more people. The North won the Civil War they were on the right side of human ethical issues. They had their best interest in helping the morals of humans and this alone helps citizens be able to trust the Union’s tendencies and this can also make a citizen loyal. The North clearly had more men to fight for them and there were more people that wanted to end slavery,...

Words: 3526 - Pages: 15