Free Essay

Engineer

In:

Submitted By kyounis
Words 5685
Pages 23
FIRST, BREAK ALL THE
RULES
What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently
By Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman
THE SUMMARY IN BRIEF
Based on in-depth interviews with more than
80,000 managers at all levels (and in companies of all sizes), the Gallup Organization’s Buckingham and
Coffman reveal in this summary what great managers do differently from ordinary managers to coax world class performance out of their workers.
Great managers, write the authors, routinely break all the rules. They take the conventional wisdom about human nature and managing people and turn it upside down.
In this summary you will learn which conventional wisdoms to ignore. First, you will find a simple list of twelve questions that will help you assess whether your workplace is the kind of place that will attract and keep the best employees.
You will then learn the four keys for unlocking the potential of each and every one of your employees. The first key is to select employees based on

talent rather than experience o intelligence. This r summary will help you learn what talent is and why you can’t create it from scratch.
The second key is to evaluate performance based on desired outcomes rather than direct control over the way a worker performs his or her job. You will learn how to define outcomes so performance can be measured and tracked.
The third key to great management is to reject the conventional wisdom that people can be fixed.
Focus on strength, the authors urge, not on weaknesses. You will learn how to manage around weaknesses. The fourth and final key is to find the right fit for your employees’ talents. Again, you will learn to avoid the conventional wisdom that promotion is the only just reward for high performance - mindset that creates an organization where everyone is ultimately promoted to their level of incompetence.

Marcus Buckingham is the leader of The Gallup Organization’s twenty-year effort to identify the core characteristics of great managers and great workplaces. He is also a senior lecturer in
Gallup’s Leadership Institute. Curt Coffman is the global practice leader for the Gallup
Organization’s Workplace Management Practice. He consults regularly on the development of productive customer-oriented workplaces.
This summary of First, Break all The Rules, What the World’s Greatest Managers
Do Differently (Simon & Schuster, 1999) is from Soundview Executive Book Summaries,
10 LaCrue Avenue, Concordville, PA 19331.

from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000

First, Break All the Rules

THE

THE COMPLETE SUMMARY

The Measuring Stick

Today, more than ever, employers realize they must find and keep top talent for every role. And the approach many of them are taking is to offer an array of carrots to keep employees happy and around. The problem is that carrots in the form of perks are expensive and may not accomplish their purpose.
Carrots don’t distinguish between great performers, mediocre performers or poor ones. Your job, of course, is to attract and keep top performers.
Unfortunately, the measures you and your company are using to determine if you are succeeding may not accurately reflect what is really happening.
You need a new measuring stick. That stick is an assessment of the strength of your workplace. Through an extensive survey, the Gallup Organization has isolated the 12 characteristics of a strong workplace as that workplace is seen through the eyes of the most successful and productive employees. If employees can answer each of the following 12 questions affirmatively, you have a strong workplace, a workplace where the best want to work and stay.
1. Do I know what is expected of me at work?
2. Do I have the equipment and material I need to do my work right?
3. At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day?
4. In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for good work?
5. Does my supervisor or someone at work seem to care about me as a person?
6. Is there someone at work who encourages my development? 7. At work, do my opinions seem to count?
8. Does the mission/purpose of my company make me feel my work is important?
9. Are my co-workers committed to doing quality work? 10. Do I have a best friend at work?
11. In the last six months, have I talked to someone about my progress?
12. This last year, have I had opportunities at work to learn and grow?
As a manager, it is your job to make sure employees can respond with a resounding yes to these dozen questions. If they can, you likely have a strong workplace capable of attracting and keeping top performers at every level from the bottom to the top.
You probably noticed that there are no questions about pay, benefits, senior management or organizational structure on the list. The reason is that
2

those are important to every employee, good, bad or mediocre. Therefore, they aren’t a true measure of a healthy and strong workplace. A workplace with nothing but low-performing employees but an excellent benefit plan would fare very well on a survey, but the survey responses would say nothing about how well the company attracts and keeps the best. And therein lies the folly of the “best places to work” type surveys. Just because a place is a good place to work doesn’t mean it will attract good workers. It may be a popular but weak workplace. To test this theory, The Gallup Organization surveyed 2,500 business units. After assessing their productivity, profitability, retention levels and customer ratings, employees were asked to answer the 12 questions. Consistently, the companies that ranked highest in the four measures of success had workers who answered the questions affirmatively and emphatically.
That is, the best business units had more workers respond that they strongly agreed with each of the 12 questions while the worst business units had fewer workers respond that way. There was a clear link between employee opinion and business unit performance. Managers are the key to a strong workplace.
Managers who create an environment where workers can answer the questions positively are the managers who will attract and retain the best.
What a Strong Workplace Looks Like
Lankford-Sysco is a strong workplace. The Ocean City, MD, workplace doesn’t look very special. The warehouses are cold and foreboding. Workers clad in arctic wear move crates in and out of deep freezers. But as you continue your tour, you quickly notice the workers are focused and cheerful. In the lobby there is a huge mural depicting company history as well as an employee portrait gallery. The company is part of a $15 billion food distribution giant, yet resembles the small, family owned operation it was before merging with industry giant Sysco.
The company has a turnover rate in the single digits, absenteeism is at an all-time low, and theft is virtually nonexistent. Company executives think they know the reason.
Every employee is paid for performance regardless of what position he or she holds. Managers constantly talk about the importance of customers and say they treat workers with respect and really listen to their concerns. In turn, workers measure their success by personal bests like breakage records and miles traveled without accidents. Virtually everyone would answer yes to the 12 measuring stick questions.

from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000

First, Break All the Rules activities of a manager and a leader are very different. If you want great managers, you must stop insisting that
How do the best managers in the world lay the founthey be great leaders and let them concentrate on their dations of a strong workplace? The Gallup talent: managing.
Organization set out to answer that question in phase
Be wary of compensation systems that identify two of a massive survey project. First, the researcher countless “competencies” for managers and expect asked clients to identify their best managers, the ones every manager to possess them all. Just as great
“you would dearly love to clone.” Next, the managers managers build on worker strengths and don’t try to were evaluated by standard measures such as the completely overhaul weaknesses, companies should not productivity and profitability of their divisions, insist that managers develop visionary talents they employee accidents, shrinkage, customer feedback and simply may not have. Concentrate instead on employee opinion. Those who scored the best overall developing the skills needed to select, set expectations, were interviewed and asked about their management motivate and develop employees. practices. Here’s how you do that.
Next, another group of managers was identified. This
First, when you select someone, select for talent group did not perform anywhere near the level of the rather than the more conventional approach, which is first set. Instead, they could best be characterized as to select for experience, mediocre. They, too, intelligence or determinacompleted the interview.
Manager as Catalyst tion. Talent is crucial to
When the results were success once you undercompared, a remarkable
People don’t change that much. stand that you can’t teach discovery came to light.
Don’t waste time trying to put in what talent, only develop it.
Great managers break all the was left out.
Talent can’t be added later, rules. They ignore the conit is either there or it is not. ventional wisdom that says
Try to draw out what was left in.
If it is there, it can be management’s job is to
That is hard enough. identify worker weaknesses nurtured to grow.
That’s the revolutionary conclusion of great and devise a plan to correct
Next, when you set managers. Great managers share another trait; and overcome those expectations, define the they see their role as catalyst rather than weaknesses. Instead, they outcome rather than the manager. One on one, great managers reach operate on the assumption right steps. That way, the inside workers and coax great performance. To that people don’t and individual is free to select become a great manager, you must work to get probably can’t change many how to reach the outcome positive answers to the first six questions high of the traits they carry. performers answered affirmatively. To get those the best way possible using
Good managers recognize answers, you must perform these four activities his or her unique talents the futility in demanding well: (within the confines of change and concentrate
4 Select the right person for the job. legal and practical instead on developing
4 Set appropriate expectations. considerations, of course.) employee strengths.
4 Motivate the person.
By defining the outcome
4 Develop the person. rather than dictating the
Managers are not Leaders steps, you allow each
If your company is going worker to use his or her talent to the fullest. to succeed in developing great managers, it had best
Next, motivate by focusing on strengths rather begin by breaking the conventional rule that managers than weaknesses. Remember, it is harder to transform are just leaders in waiting. Great managers need to be weaknesses than it is to develop strengths. If you focus recognized for what they do best; reaching inside a on weaknesses, you doom the worker to perpetual and worker and encouraging exceptional performance. That impossible self-improvement plans. Instead, recognize is not the same as being a great leader. that some workers will be more productive and happier
Great managers look inward, inside the company, doing what they have a talent for. Instead, find ways to into the individual, into the differences in style, goals, reward those who don’t want to move up. needs and motivations of each person. They then find
Finally, when developing someone, help him or her the right way to release each person’s unique talents find the right fit, rather than simply the next rung of into great performance. By contrast, great leaders look the corporate ladder. Don’t do what most managers do, outward. They look out of the company, into the which is to promote everyone to their level of future, and seek out alternative routes. They are incompetence. visionaries, strategic thinkers, activators. The core

The Wisdom of Great Managers

3

from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000

First, Break All the Rules

The First Key:
Select for Talent
Talent is a quality we are all familiar with. Michael
Jordan has talent, as do Robert De Niro, Tiger Woods,
Jay Leno, and Maya Angelou. These celebrities have special abilities in sports and the arts. But talent isn’t restricted to Hollywood or the sports arena. Good managers recognize that talent is something everyone possesses in varying degrees.
Talent may be the ability to remember the name that
Myths of Talents
Myth # 1 Talents are rare and special
The truth is there is nothing particularly special about talent. Remember, a talent is simply a recurring pattern of thought, feeling, or behavior. The key is for managers to help each employee cultivate his talents by finding him a role that plays to those talents. Nurses who can empathize are valuable as floor nurses, not administrators. Similarly, surgeons and anesthesiologists may love the thrill of life and death decisions that others might feel as pressure. They are well suited for their jobs.
Myth # 2: Some roles are so easy, they don’t require talent All roles require talent. And managers who assume anyone could do a particular job or that everyone doing that job wants out of it as soon as possible are seeing the position through their own filters.

goes with the face, or the ability to solve complex puzzles. It can be your fascination with risk or your impatience. It can be your aversion to risk and your patience. In the workplace, talent is any recurring pattern of thought, feeling or behavior.
Great managers understand that every role performed with excellence requires talent, because every role requires certain recurring patterns of thought, feelings or behavior. Consider the example of great nurses. Great nurses have a talent we commonly call empathy, or the ability to feel what another is feeling. They empathize with their charges, making the patient feel that they are cared about
Talent is far more important than experience, brainpower or will power. Managers who pore over each person’s résume to see who he or she worked for and the kind of work he or she performed believe the past is a window to the future, and credit experience as a valuable lesson. Experience can be all that, but it is no guarantee. And intelligence is nice, but it does not guarantee performance. We have all had experiences
4

with workers who got great grades in school but simply weren’t motivated or interested in performing in the job. Similarly, willpower is not enough.
If you want to be an exceptional manager, you must select for talent. To do so, you must know what talent is necessary for the job. The best way to identify relevant talents is to study your best.
The Right Stuff
Perhaps nothing better illustrates the need to place talent over experience, determination or intelligence than the Mercury Space Program. Faced with the race for space, seven men were carefully selected for the program after passing rigorous physical and psychological tests. All seven were trained on space travel. Eventually, they would fly six missions.
In all, there were two textbook flights, two heroic ones and two mediocre ones. Two men, Allen Shepard and Wally Schirra, experienced the textbook flights with no drama and no surprises. Two others had heroic flights. Both John Glenn and Gordon Cooper experienced unanticipated mechanical problems and both handled them brilliantly. Cooper even managed the most accurate splashdown of the program despite a loss of his reentry guidance system. But two did considerably less well. Gus Grisson panicked when his craft splashed down and opened his hatch too soon in an effort to get out. He was rescued but the craft was lost. Scott Cooper appeared to be so excited about his flight that he foolishly used up most of his fuel flying this way and that. He was almost lost in space forever.
Why did six well-trained, smart and experienced astronauts perform so differently? The answer lies in talent. Exposed to the same stimuli, all six reacted differently, filtering what was happening. They each
Three Kinds of Talent
There are three basic types of talent: striving, thinking and relating talents.
Striving talents explain the why of a person. Does he or she want to stand out, or is good enough good enough?
Thinking talents explain the how of a person. Does he think linearly or does he or she strategize with “what if” games? Is he or she structured or does the person love surprises? Relating talents explain the who of a person. Whom does he or she trust, whom does he or she build relation ships with? Does he love confrontation or avoid it?

had a unique way of responding to what was happening. One panicked when claustrophobia set in, another was unable to control his desire to play, while others reacted to emergencies calmly and saved the day.

First, Break All the Rules

The Second Key:
Define the Right Outcomes
If you want to manage well, you must understand that management is not about direct control, but about remote control. That is, you must realize that trying to control every aspect of someone’s performance is futile. The object must be to allow people enough room to accomplish the goals set by the organization.
World class managers understand this concept almost intuitively and see their role as focusing people toward performance. In other words, they don’t see their primary goal as developing workers or creating an environment that makes each person feel special and significant. But remarkably, by focusing on performance enhancement, those things happen anyway. The dilemma for managers is that they know they can’t change much about an individual and that they must focus people on performance. The solution is both elegant and efficient. Define the outcome and let each person find his or her own way to it. Each person can reach the outcome by the route most comfortable for him or her, and each worker takes responsibility for the solution. In the end, by focusing on outcome, your employees will become more self-reliant and self-aware.
Perfect Plan Flops
When Madeline Hunter, an educator at UCLA, studied expert teachers, she saw that they had a method in common.
They approached each lesson in a similar fashion, starting with a brief review and ending with a period of independent study. She became convinced that by following a simple seven-step lesson plan, every teacher could be a great teacher, every teacher could be perfect.
She was wrong. In practice, there were no differences in test scores for students taught with her method than other methods. Other teachers using other methods sometimes did better, and sometimes worse. In the end, her one best way method flopped, partly because different teachers have different talents. When the focus was on the steps and not the outcome, the steps were useless.

The Temptation to Control
If you want to manage your division or company effectively, you must avoid the temptation to take control of the way your employees achieve the outcomes you defined. Each temptation is familiar and each can sap the life out of the company.
First, avoid the temptation to create perfect people.
Imagine a well-intentioned expert wanting to help workers rise above their imperfections. He identified the “one best way” to perform a function.
5

And off to training they go because the manager believes that the “one best way” can be taught. Once his people are trained, he reasons, all that is left is to monitor that everyone is following the plan.
Don’t attempt to make perfect people. What looks like a miracle cure is actually a disease that diminishes
Remember Desired Outcome
Airlines often define customer satisfaction in terms of on-time departures. In practice, some airlines define ontime departures from the time the plane left the gate.
Time spent on the tarmac isn’t counted. Consider what happens when a plane full of passengers waits to take off for several hours because the airline does not want to cancel the departure and lose an on-time departure. Here, the defined rule (leaving the gate but not leaving the ground) prevents reaching the desired outcome
(customer satisfaction).

and demeans people, and weakens the organization.
Second, avoid the temptation to declare that your people don’t have enough talent. Every job requires some talent. Select for it and you won’t need to control every move. For example, not everyone is suited for outbound telemarketing. No amount of training is going to make someone succeed who is afraid of rejection and non-competitive, no matter what script he or she follows. Instead, select for the dual talents of competitiveness and ability to connect to others.
Third, don’t buy the belief that trust is precious and must be earned. If you have a basic mistrust of people, you are likely to want to control the details of their performance rather than set the outcomes and let the employee find his or her way.
Another temptation you must guard against is the belief that some outcomes defy definition. It just isn’t so. Some outcomes, such as “employee morale” or
“customer satisfaction” may be difficult to define, but they are measurable nonetheless.
Rules of Thumb
Follow these rules of thumb, and you will manage for outcome by turning talent into performance:
• All employees must follow safety and accuracy rules for everyone’s protection.
• Employees must follow required steps when they are a part of company or industry standards.
• Required steps are only useful if they don’t obscure the desired outcome.
• Steps don’t lead to customer satisfaction, but can only prevent dissatisfaction.

First, Break All the Rules employees want to be treated? Ask! In particular, get to know their goals for the future and how they prefer to be praised. It makes no sense, for example, to force a shy worker to accept an award at a gala banquet.
Above all else, don’t believe that fairness requires you to treat everyone alike. Act as if each worker is unique and give each what he or she needs to succeed.

The Third Key:
Focus on Strengths
If you want to become a great manager and want to release each person’s potential, you must let workers become more of what they already are. You must focus on each employee’s strengths and manage around his or her weaknesses. Each person is different, with a unique set of talents, passions, yearnings and patterns of behavior. Don’t let stereotypes about people blind you to that reality.
It is very tempting to try to fix people, but it just doesn’t work. It simply isn’t true that everyone can be anything they want to be if only they try hard enough.
If you only focus on weaknesses, you are doomed to failure just as you would be if you tried to “fix” a romantic interest. If you insist that every worker turn non-talents into talents, it simply won’t happen. The worker will fail.
So how does a great manager manage around weaknesses and encourage strengths? It is actually rather simple. First, make sure each worker is in a role that uses his or her talents; casting is everything. Second, manage by exception. And finally, spend the most time with your best people.

Spend the Most Time With Your Best People
Great managers play favorites. Great managers spend the most time with the most productive members of their staff. Remember that “no news” kills behavior. Your stars may think you are ignoring them if you spend most of your time with the strugglers, and will eventually stop being your top performers. You must tell them often that they are your top people.
Ironically, spending a lot of time with your strugglers isn’t very productive. Oh, to be sure, you begin to understand what failure looks like. But don’t assume that you will learn what works. That you can only learn from your top performers.
Average is Irrelevant
Consider what happens when performance is measured against “excellent” performers rather than the average. For data entry work, the national average is
380,000 keypunches per month. But a wise manager doesn’t measure performance against that. Here’s what happened when one manager used a top performer, who “averaged” 560,000 punches per month, as the standard. Within six months of receiving feedback and recognition, she was over the 3 million mark! Her manager designed a performance pay plan around her. Today, the department “average” is over 1 million strokes.

Casting for Talent
If you want to turn talent into performance, you must position each person so that you are paying him or her to do what he or she is naturally wired to do.
That means you place your patient, relationshipbuilding salesman in the territory that requires careful nurturing and your aggressive, ego-driven salesman in the territory that requires a fire lit under it.
Of course, sometimes it isn’t that easy. Many managers take over a group of workers and go about identifying keepers and losers, and then fill the empty slots with new people. But don’t throw out the losers so fast; perhaps they were miscast and there is another role for them. Sometimes it is as simple as recognizing what kind of attention the employee craves. A “loser” who desires a close relationship with a manager may blossom if you give it to him or her.

It is also crucial that you get away from looking at everything through averages. In business, far too much is measured in terms of average. Don’t make the mistake of using averages to calculate performance. Do not measure a struggler’s performance against the average; measure it against excellent performance.

Manage by Exception
Every worker should be treated as an exception, as a unique individual. Some want you to leave them alone.
Others want to check in with you regularly. Some crave recognition by you, the “boss.” Others are only happy with peer praise. Some want publicity, while others want a private, quiet thanks for a job well done.
The best managers break the Golden Rule every day.
Instead of doing unto others as they would want done onto them, they do unto others as others would have done unto themselves. But how do you know how your

How to Manage Around a Weakness
All this focus on high performers doesn’t mean that you should ignore the non-performers. Poor performance must be confronted head on, or it will degenerate into a dangerously unproductive situation.
Procrastination in the face of poor performance is a fool’s remedy.
First, a great manager will look for obvious solutions to a performance problem. Does the worker have the equipment and support needed to do the job? If not,
6

First, Break All the Rules get it. Is there a personal problem? If so, be patient. current role aren’t tempted to take a promotion solely
Next, see if the problem can be cured with some for the money. In fact, with broadbanding, the training. Perhaps the employee isn’t adept at a promotion may net less pay, not more. computer program and needs some instruction.
Another solution is to create upper level jobs that
The problem is more complicated if the employee is still utilize talents workers used previously, but don’t being asked to perform a job for which he or she does ask the worker to perform an entirely foreign role. not have talent. For example, if you can’t remember
Lawyers have been doing this for years. Attorneys start names, that non-talent becomes a weakness if you take as associates with a specialty and develop their area of a job as a server in a expertise as they move up restaurant. If talent is lacking, through the ranks to there are only three possible partner. A Perfect Support System ways to make it work. Either devise a support system to
When a fast food restaurant chain began hiring
Turning the Keys: overcome the lack of talent, mentally disabled workers, managers faced several
A Practical Guide performance challenges. One involved a young or find a compatible partner
You now know that the woman whose job it was to load frozen chicken into for him or her, or find an four keys to great managea fryer and remove the chicken when a bell rang. alternative role.
She did well except for one problem. She could not ment are selecting for count to six, the maximum number of chicken talent, defining the right
The Fourth Key: pieces the fryer could hold for safe and thorough outcomes, focusing on
Find the Right Fit frying. She did not have a talent for counting, and strengths, and finding the teaching her was impossible. The restaurant reaSooner or later, someone right fit. You are now soned that if they could supply chicken prepacked who works for you will tell ready to turn the keys. in six piece lots, she would be able to do the job. you he wants to grow, to earn
The supplier refused to cooperate, so the more status and money, and
Interview for Talent restaurant found one that would. With the proper gain more prestige. He wants
Remember that intersupport system, the worker succeeded. to move up and wants your viewing for talent, rather help. Should you help him? than just experience, That depends on whether the intelligence and drive, is an worker’s talents can be utilized in the role he seeks. art form. Here are some tools that may help. First,
Your role as a manager is to make sure your make sure the talent interview stands on its own. There employees are in roles that fit. This may mean a is only one purpose, to see if the candidate’s recurring promotion, a lateral move, or even a move back to patterns of thought, feeling and behavior match the another position. Understandably, a transfer or job. This interview must be very structured.
“demotion” may be unpopular, and a promotion
Start by asking a few open-ended questions and wait popular, but a great manager always steers workers for the answer. For example, you might ask a teaching toward roles that create the greatest chance for success. candidate what he likes about teaching. Let him answer
The problem with conventional wisdom is that and be quiet. And believe his answers even if they promotion to the next level is seen as inevitable, aren’t what you want to hear. desirable and the only way to get ahead. It doesn’t have
Second, listen for specific responses to questions like to be that way. Companies can design systems that
“Tell me about a time when you overcame resistance to reward people who climb the ladder and those who an idea.” If the candidate can’t provide specifics quickdon’t. Only when there are opportunities for more ly, he or she probably hasn’t overcome resistance very prestige and more money at the present level will the often; it is not a trait he or she has. allure of the corporate ladder lose its pull. And only
Next, listen for clues to talents. Ask the applicant then will workers find that they haven’t been promoted what kinds of roles he or she has learned rapidly in the into roles that don’t fit. past. Ask what satisfies him or her about past work.
One solution is to create pay plans that rely on broadbanding. With a broadband system, pay scales
Turning the Last Three Keys Everyday often overlap. That is, a lower level position may pay
The biggest challenge for great managers is to continfar more than the entry-level position next on the ue to turn the last three keys every day. To meet this career ladder. Companies that broadband pay scales challenge, great managers develop a routine for recognize that those who perform a role well shouldn’t performance management that displays four have to abandon that role for the next one up the characteristics: ladder. In effect, those who are comfortable in their
7

First, Break All the Rules








Simplicity. Great managers don’t use complicated appraisal systems. Instead, they concentrate on what to tell each employee and how to tell them.
Frequent interaction. Great managers also frequently interact with each worker, not just once a year at review time. Meet, at a minimum, once a quarter to discuss performance. The meeting doesn’t have to last long, but it must focus on performance. One clear advantage to frequent feedback is that poor performance can be corrected earlier rather than be left for a
“bombshell” discussion at annual review time.
Focus on the future. All reviews should focus on the future. Great managers ask workers to identify where they want to go and how they are going to go about getting there.
Self-tracking. Great managers also ask workers to track their own performance and write down successes, goals and discoveries throughout the review period.

Creating the Climate for Great Managers
Companies can do a great deal to create a climate in which great managers flourish. Great performance will happen if companies defy conventional wisdom and start turning the four keys to performance. How do you start?
First, define every role in terms of outcomes. Second, begin measuring, rating and quantifying as many outcomes as possible. And hold managers accountable for their employees’ responses to the 12 questions discussed earlier.
The company also has to value world class performance in every role at every level. Broadband salaries and reward personal bests. Don’t forget to study the top performers; they are the key to success. If you create a climate where great managers can flourish, you will begin experiencing performance management at its best. Soundview Executive Book Summaries is published monthly. To order Executive Book Summaries, send your name and address to Soundview, 10 LaCrue Avenue, Concordville, PA 19331, or call 1-800-521-1227. Subscriptions are $89.50 per year.

8

from Soundview Executive Book Summaries February 2000

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Engineer and Layer

...Name: HUY HUYNH Class: PHIL-370 Instructor: Michael Davis Third Paper ENGINEERS AND LAYERS Ornella Muti, P.E., was retained by plaintiff’s attorney to evaluate a transponder used in small planes to determine whether it could have been the cause of a mid-air collision. While doing the evaluation, Muti discovered that the transponder has a flaw which, though unrelated to the collision, might well cause another dangerous error, failure to respond during the approach to landing if the ambient temperature is too high. Since this second flaw both concerns public safety and was unrelated to the case, Muti sent a senior engineer at the defendant company a copy of the relevant parts of her report when she sent the entire report to the plaintiff’s attorney, telling the attorney what she had done. Plaintiff’s attorney then filed a complaint with us, alleging breach of confidentiality, breach of contract, and other unprofessional conduct. The case is pretty simple to understand. Muti was hired by a plaintiff’s attorney to investigate a transponder whether it caused a mid-air collision. While doing so, she found an unrelated flaw that could cause a hazard. She sent a second engineer at the defendant company parts of her report, and then sent a full report to the plaintiff’s attorney, telling about the second engineer. The attorney filed a complaint against Muti. The case itself has a few ambiguous details. We have made the following assumptions to clarify these ambiguities so that we...

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethics in Engineer

...Response Journal 2 - Ethics Ethics is one of the most common concept that every engineers must know before starting their career life. The code of ethics for engineer was created so that engineers can follow these codes and do not attempt to make any error intentionally. It is a set of rules and obligations that set a standard for an engineer’s decision. In other word, the code of ethics required every engineers to be honest, fairness, equity, and must be dedicated to the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. (Engineers, 2007) The short story “The adventure of the Engineer’s thumb” written by Arthur Conan Doyle is a good example regarding engineering’s code of ethics. The story was told to Sherlock Holmes, began in London 1889 about a young hydraulic engineer, Mr. Hatherley. Hatherley was offered to fix a hydraulic machine with a salary of 50 guineas by a person who identified himself as Colonel Lysander Stark. However, the job has to be perform around mid-night although rather to be just around an hour, out of town in Berkshire. Hatherley could not resist to accept a good offer because his gross taking was only 27 pounds 10s every day. Stark wanted the job to be performed at midnight because he did not want his neighbors to acknowledge the valuable of the land around them. There were large deposit of fuller’s earth under the land. Later on, after arriving to Stark’s place and took an inspection of the press machine, Hatherley discovered the floor consist of...

Words: 688 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Shortage of Engineers

...that we use to make our life more comfortable are created and maintained by engineers. Clearly engineers play an important role in our lives. However, there is a shortage of them. I believe that studying engineering should be encouraged and we should make engineering a more attractive career. In this report, I will address the importance of engineers, reasons why we are lacking them and some solutions that can help solve the problem. 2. The importance of Engineers Engineers apply their knowledge in mathematics, sciences, economics and society and use their practical skills to design and build structures, machines, devices, materials, systems, and processes1. Looking around us, everything from vehicles, buildings, facilities to our laptops, mobile phones have been created and are still maintained by engineers. Hence, it is hard to imagine how our lives will be without them. Moreover, engineers are those who has changed and shaped the world today. “Engineers will drive the solutions to today’s most pressing problems” – Quote by Dean of Engineering, UC Berkeley. One of the most significant events in the history of the world’s economy is the Industrial revolution in eighteenth and nineteenth century. Starting in the UK, the manufacturing of products has switched from animal and labour based to machine based. Since then, the UK economy, and later the most of Europe economy have developed dramatically. Engineers continue to solve one of the biggest problems today, global warming. The...

Words: 1076 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Engineers

...ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA INFORMATION BOOKLET How to increase your chances of getting your first engineering job in Australia Guide for migrant professional engineers, engineering technologists and engineering associates JENNIFER O’DONOVAN 2 “How to increase your chances of getting your first engineering job in Australia” Author: Jennifer O’Donovan, Manager Career Development Centre, Engineers Australia, Sydney Editor: Dr Dietrich Georg Copyright 2013 © Engineers Australia All rights reserved Published by Engineers Media Pty Ltd, Crows Nest, Sydney, www.engineersmedia.com.au, on behalf of Engineers Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry is available from the National Library of Australia http://catalogue.nla. gov.au/ ISBN 978-1-922107-26-8 The material contained in this practice note is in the nature of general comment only and is not advice on any particular matter. No one should act on the basis of anything contained in this note without taking appropriate professional advice upon the particular circumstances. The publisher and the author do not accept responsibility for the consequences of any action taken or omitted to be taken by any person on the basis of anything contained in or omitted from this note. Engineers Australia “How to increase your chances of getting your first engineering job in Australia” 3 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Preparing yourself 2.1. Language skills 2.2 Communication skills 2.3. Further study 2.4. Continuing professional...

Words: 6101 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Civil Engineers

...Responsibilities and Duties of a Civil Engineer Author : Exforsys Inc. Published on: 26th Oct 2006 | Last Updated on: 13th Dec 2010 The General Responsibilities and Specific Duties of a Civil Engineer The work of a civil engineer is all around us yet many do not even realize what a civil engineer is responsible for doing. The job role of a civil engineer is extremely important as it equates for the overall safety of society in many different facets. It is important to look at the role that a civil engineer plays and realize what they do in their daily job duties that make the area safe for the people who live there. What Is a Civil Engineer? It is important to first provide a formal definition highlighting the role of a civil engineer. A civil engineer is responsible for using their civil engineering background to plan and oversee various construction efforts in many different areas of this field. They will apply civil engineering principles to ensure that structures are constructed in the safest, sturdiest manner. General Responsibilities of a Civil Engineer A civil engineer engages in many general responsibilities on a daily basis. These responsibilities are a crucial part of their job and enable the civil engineer to engage in their profession to the best of their ability. One general responsibility of the civil engineer is to analyze various factors concerning a construction job. The civil engineer will analyze the proposed site location as well as the entire...

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Civil Engineers

...Responsibilities and Duties of a Civil Engineer Author : Exforsys Inc.     Published on: 26th Oct 2006    |   Last Updated on: 13th Dec 2010 The General Responsibilities and Specific Duties of a Civil Engineer The work of a civil engineer is all around us yet many do not even realize what a civil engineer is responsible for doing. The job role of a civil engineer is extremely important as it equates for the overall safety of society in many different facets. It is important to look at the role that a civil engineer plays and realize what they do in their daily job duties that make the area safe for the people who live there. What Is a Civil Engineer? It is important to first provide a formal definition highlighting the role of a civil engineer. A civil engineer is responsible for using their civil engineering background to plan and oversee various construction efforts in many different areas of this field. They will apply civil engineering principles to ensure that structures are constructed in the safest, sturdiest manner. General Responsibilities of a Civil Engineer A civil engineer engages in many general responsibilities on a daily basis. These responsibilities are a crucial part of their job and enable the civil engineer to engage in their profession to the best of their ability. One general responsibility of the civil engineer is to analyze various factors concerning a construction job. The civil engineer will analyze the proposed site location as well as the entire...

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Deteriorating Technical Niche of Engineers

...| | | | | | | | | | INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT KOZHIKODE | | | | Deteriorating Technical Niche of Software EngineersSSD | Project Proposal8/24/2014 | | Submitted By: | EPGP-05-121 | Jaspreet Singh | EPGP-05-141 | Rajan Gupta | EPGP-05-148 | Sandip Shah | EPGP-05-156 | Susanta Paul | EPGP-05-142 | Raja Row Choudhury | Proposal for Simulation and System Dynamics.@2014 Authors. No part of this document should be reproduced or distributed without the prior permission of authors. | Problem Area Technical Talent shortage, Skill-Gap, Skill Mismatch, Skills shortage, etc. are the expressions of the same problem which have remained abuzz in almost all the Technology centric industries since years. The case of IT Services Industry is no different. In fact the skill gap widens even more, as the pace on which the technologies are changing in the IT / Digital space is the fastest. Concepts of IT have evolved so fast that it seems we have lived through multiple eras in less than a decade’s time – dot-com era; Information era with the advent of the powerful Search engine, Google and the knowledge collaborators, Wikis; the E-era, in which IT engulfed the whole Business value-chain with its e-models – e-commerce to e-business; then came the Social-era, which re-defined not just businesses but the people’s lives by taking them thousands of miles ahead in terms of reach, connectivity, opportunities, etc.; and now we are living in a Digital...

Words: 688 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Engineers Ethical Actions

...The ideal professional engineer should, above all, be honest. Honesty in the engineering profession is very important as people often bet their lives on the safety of the engineers‟ products”. Ideally a professional engineer should be a critical thinker, creative, and have a strong enough confidence in his own ideas to stand up for them when being critiqued. This is sometimes not the case; I have met many engineering students who, when asked why they feel they have the best solution, back down and decide that they must be wrong. That is the opposite of what an ideal engineer should do. A professional engineer seeks to apply their sound moral reasoning, technical competency, communication ability, and ethical behavior to all situations they are faced with, both on and off the Clock. * Dedication * Diligence * Honesty * Efficiency 2.1 An engineer should be transparent and receptive to peer review or checking of his work if requested/required by the client/authorities 2.2 A checker engineer must be open to the views and design concept of the original designer and in areas of disagreement the checker must give justification for his disagreement. 2.3 A checker engineer should take full responsibility for the checking of the work himself. 2.4 An engineer should undertake CPD to enhance his knowledge and capability 2.5 An employer engineer should ensure that his employee engineers are BONA FIDE engineers registered with BEM. 2.6 An engineer should report unethical...

Words: 423 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Manual of Professional Practice for Electronics Engineers

...MANUAL OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS I. CODE OF ETHICS FOR ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING PRACTITIONERS FOREWORD Honesty, justice and courtesy form a moral philosophy which, associated mutual interest among men, constitutes the foundation of ethics. The electronics engineer should recognize such standard, not in passive observance, but a set of dynamic principles guiding his conduct and way of life. It is his duty to practice his profession according to this Code of Ethics and Conduct. The keystone of professional conduct is integrity. Hence, it behoves the electronics engineer to discharge his duties with fidelity to the public, his employer and his client and with fairness and impartially to all. It is my duty to interest himself in public welfare, and to be ready to apply his special knowledge for the benefit of mankind. He should uphold the honor and dignity of his profession and avoid association with enterprise of questionable character. In his dealings with fellow engineers, he should be fair and tolerant. RELATIONS WITH THE STATE 1. Each and every engineer shall recognize and the supreme authority of the State as express through its laws and implemented by its agencies, whenever wherever such laws do not infringe upon the rights and privileges of citizens as guaranteed by the Constitution. 2. He shall recognize that the well-being of the public and the interest of the State are above the well-being and interest of any individual. ...

Words: 1403 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Pursuing A Career As An Aerospace Engineer

...Aerospace Engineering In my personality assessment I was of the INTP group and I would have been it said I would be a good engineer. Some personality traits that I could offer any career that I chose are my determination and my critical thinking. I chose aerospace engineering because I have always enjoyed building things and thngs that fly. Here is some background on aerospace enginnering. Here is the history of aerospace engineering. Aerospace engineering started during the renaissance era the first designs being Leonardo da Vinci and the first manned flight happened in 1783. The career first affected the economy during WWI when they started outfitted the planes for war. Over the decades the process has been industurilized and made easier by the use of machines. They also have redesigned planes to make them mor aerodynamic. One thing that hasn’t changed is the design process. The engineers still need to design the most aerodynamic plane they can....

Words: 602 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mechanical Engineers Qualities for Millennium 3

...Mechanical Engineers Qualities for Millennium 3 1) Bachelor’s Degree/Diploma in Mechanical Engineering or its equivalent. The mechanical engineer has been called the general practitioner and the jack-of-all trades among engineering professions. This is because he requires education and skills that span a broad range of technical, social, environmental, and economic problems. In general, however, the mechanical engineer is concerned with controlling the principles of motion, energy, and force through mechanical solutions. A mechanical engineer designs the tools and processes used for satisfying the needs of society through a combination of material, human, and economic resources. He might work on electric generators, internal combustion engines, steam and gas turbines, and other power-generating machines. He might also develop machines such as refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment, power tools, and other power-using machines. Engineers must combine a good understanding of science, mathematics, and computers with a good knowledge of current technology. At the high school level, the emphasis is on mathematics. Two years of algebra plus courses in geometry and trigonometry generally are required. In addition to the sciences and math, engineers need good communication skills, so don't neglect the liberal arts and humanities. In addition, remember that many of the large industrial firms that employ mechanical engineers are multinational...

Words: 2344 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Texas A & M: A Career As An Electrical Engineer

...Choosing electrical engineering wasn’t my first choice when deciding what career path I wanted to advance on. As the day got closer for me to get ready to begin my application to transfer to Texas A&M, I looked at other engineering careers Texas A&M offered and electrical engineering caught my attention. I read further into the degree and decided to put electrical engineering as my first choice in my Texas A&M application. Electrical engineering is growing every year more and more due to the development of better and self-functioning machines that help make jobs easier to carry out. Another main reason I chose electrical engineering is also the high paying jobs it offers and as well many opportunities in the working field to advance and become...

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Electronics Engineer

...Power Characteristics of Networks on Chip Mohamed A. Abd El ghany*, Darek Korzec* and Mohammed Ismail** Electronics Engineering Dept., German University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt* Electrical Engineering Dept., The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA. The RaMSiS Group, KTH, Sweden** E-mails: mohamed.abdel-ghany@guc.edu.eg, darek.korzec@guc.edu.eg, ismail@ece.osu.edu Abstract— Power characteristics of different Network on Chip (NoC) topologies are developed. Among different NoC topologies, the Butterfly Fat Tree (BFT) dissipates the minimum power. With the advance in technology, the relative power consumption of the interconnects and the associate repeaters of the BFT decreases as compared to the power consumption of the network switches. The power dissipation of interswitch links and repeaters for BFT represents only 1% of the total power dissipation of the network. In addition of providing high throughput, the BFT is a power efficient topology for NoCs. Index Terms – NoC, Power Dissipation, BFT. CLICHÉ, Octagon, SPIN, Interswitch Links I. INTRODUCTION With the increasing number of intellectual property blocks (IPs) in System on Chips (SoCs), billions of transistors integrated on a single chip will soon become a reality. The limitations of system scalability, bandwidth and power dissipation are becoming the major drawbacks for high performance SoCs. Recently, Network-on-Chip (NoC) architectures are emerging as the best replacement for the existing...

Words: 2709 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Boss

...understand the reality of ‘engineering.' For them, engineers are “super-humans” who build rockets, robots, electric vehicles and the like. The reason is that when a person says he works on a satellite project, people jump to the conclusion that he knows every detail of building a satellite. In reality, no engineer can know the entire details of projects. For example, it requires people from various disciplines such as electrical, mechanical, chemical and materials engineering to design an electric car. Since the common man has the “super-human” view in mind, he generally does not accept or appreciate many of the “real” engineering works. For example, a home inverter might not bring about any awe to the common man as does an electric vehicle (though both might be equally challenging to build), because he often finds a technician setting right the problems in a home inverter. The technician just knows by experience what to do, whereas an engineer knows why it has to be done. Engineering is more valuable than science First, I will clarify the difference between ‘science' and ‘engineering' through a simple example. The study of optics of materials will fall under science. Scientists (physicists, in this case) will try to explain the optical properties which different materials possess. If someone tries to use the optical properties to make a microscope or a camera, he will be an engineer. Scientists establish facts which engineers exploit to make things useful to society. History...

Words: 855 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marketing Strategy

...this is what is called being selfish. For example, the purchase amounts of staff time to work on the weekend. This Quite simply is not the work of an ethical famous factories do, do. In light of the reputation and confidence, showing factories famous quality and value at the expense of small factories and start-ups. Greed to get as much as possible from customers and a thousand The benefits of competition to make catalog immoral. The most affected is the ultimate consumer Engineers are always trying to develop their companies no matter what the cost is. Many of the engineers working more than they should. For example, some of the engineers is trying hard to reach the top for the success of that company, even if it cost him to work outside working hours. Good job he does not harm in it. But, you gave the right engineer for other engineers to show themselves? Is this the work of aspiring engineer for selfish for himself or to serve the community and the people? Is this the work of engineer will cost consumers the right price, or he would use the uniqueness of this product is to raise prices exaggerated? I believe...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2