Free Essay

Robert Latimer

In: Social Issues

Submitted By 007price
Words 378
Pages 2
Euthanasia and the Canadian LAW: Robert Latimer

Robert Latimer, a farmer working in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan killed his 12 year old daughter Tracy in 1983. Latimer admitted he loved his daughter and killed her to the police. He said he couldn’t bear to watch Tracy suffer from a severe form of cerebral palsy. Thus causing Latimer to kill his daughter and “free her from misery”. Latimer was charged of first-degree murder and a year later convicted of second-degree murder.

This case arose many legal questions including: * Should courts abide by the book or the situation of the accused? * Would a decision favorable to Latimer legalize euthanasia? * Would it put the disabled in danger?

The decision of this trial would determine the fate of the disabled. Any leniency towards Latimer would suggest the disabled are regarded as second-class citizens. Other laws such as abortion were referred to the deliberation of this case. The case soon became complex as the idea of ‘compassionate homicide’ vs. ‘cold-blooded murder’ proceeded. After that idea, Latimer was later given a constitutional exception in 2008 due the case being labeled as ‘compassionate homicide’ and the fact that the accused poses no threat in society. Plus, Latimer had killed his daughter for altruistic reasons.

Before Latimer’s constitutional exception, it was taken in consideration that Tracy was a relatively a merry child and her rights had been violated by her father. Although, Tracy’s life was very limited it still had quality and value. In the end, Latimer was ultimately released on 2008 with his constitutional exception. Latimer’s leniency did not degrade the disabled since related cases such as battered women who killed their batterer often received leniency from the courts.

Laws affecting the outcome of this case may change future laws. Euthanasia, mercy killing, or doctor assisted suicide is currently illegal. The outcome of this case suggests it is ‘ok’ to kill people who are terminally ill. Quebec’s Bill 52 would perhaps reference this case to support their idea of ‘medical aid in dying’. People terminally ill from overlooking at this case may ask for leniency to die. In other words, ask for legalization of euthanasia. The decision of this case strongly supports Quebec’s Bill 52 and is most likely to be overlooked.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Robert Latimer Essay

...Robert Latimer Editorial The horrible, yet tragic story of Robert Latimer and his 12 year old daughter, Tracy Latimer, had brought upon much controversy when trying to make an ethical decision on whether or not the father should be punished. To briefly summarize the story, it is about a father who could not bear to watch his daughter suffer from cerebral palsy causing him to murder her and put her out of her misery. Tracy was a 40-pound quadriplegic, a 12-year-old who functioned at the level of a three-month-old. He decieded to place his daughter into his car and run a hose from an exhaust pipe into the car, and watch her slowly die. This court case raised many questions as to how a man could kill his own daughter, and would the court realize that the killing was purely out of compassion. Tracy had been operated on multiple times and at the time of her murder was due for more surgery. Her father could not watch her live like this. Martin O’Malley begins by asking society the following questions: “Should courts abide by the letter or the spirit of the law? Would a decision favourable to Latimer legalize euthanasia, mercy killing? Would it put the disabled in danger? Would it mean the end of mandatory minimum sentences for convicted persons?”. These questions make you think about the outcome of the case and how this particular case may change the way people view euthanasia. He then goes on to say that people with disabilities are viewed as second class, when he says, “by...

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Robert Latimer Robert Latimer was born March 13, 1953, and was a Canadian canola and wheat farmer near Wilkie, Saskatchewan, where he lived with his wife Laura, and their four kids. On October 24, 1993 Latimer was convicted of second-degree murder in the death of his daughter Tracy Latimer. Latimer was released on day parole in March 2008 and was granted full parole. Robert Latimer was not a quiet man in his youth. He went to lots of parties and, smoked lots of marijuana. He got into trouble a few times with the law over these things. Then he married Laura, settled down and took over his father's farm. Tracy was their first child (later they had three more) and Robert and Laura suffered for twelve years to make some sort of life for her. Tracy Latimer was born November 23, 1980. Tracy was born with cerebral palsy. (The medical definition for cerebral palsy is damage to the center that controls the brain, but in Tracy’s case it was the lack of oxygen to the brain during birth.) For Tracy this later lead to severe mental and physical disabilities including seizures that were only to be controlled with medication. She could not walk, talk, or feed herself. It was said that Tracy was in constant pain. She could not take any pain medications other than Tylenol due to stomach bleeding, constipation, and aspiration pneumonia. On October 24, 1993 Laura Latimer found Tracy dead. She had died under the care of her father while the rest of the family was at church. At first......

Words: 478 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...will never have to go through such a tough choice. If you kill them, you have to live with that on your conscious for the rest of your life. But, if you let them live, you have to watch them suffer and struggle every day just to live to the next day. “Cerebral palsy is a group of disorders that can involve brain and nervous system functions such as movement, learning, hearing, seeing, and thinking.” (A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia). Tracy Latimer was only 12 years old when she suffered from Cerebral Palsy. She couldn’t move, hear, see, or anything. She was basically a human vegetable. Her father, Robert, was supposed to take her to get an operation done. Instead, he locked her in the car and let it run, which eventually led her to die from carbon monoxide poisoning. He was convicted of second degree murder and was given a 10 year sentence. Did Robert Latimer do the right thing? Should he be looked at as a danger to society and a murderer? Or should people look at him as somebody that saved his daughters life? Yes, Robert Latimer is unquestionably a murderer. He took away the life of an innocent 12 year old girl who did not do anything wrong in her life. She was not a threat to anybody. All she did was take up air. She couldn’t move, see, hear, or do anything. Why kill her if she isn’t harming anybody? You can’t just take people’s lives away because you feel like they should die. First of all, he didn’t even have his daughters consent. If his daughter had......

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Case of Tracy Latimer

...The Case of Tracy Latimer Applied Ethics Paper Summer 2013 Murder, the word sounds very ominous. When one thinks of murder they tend to be morally outraged. Morality, now that word sounds like a very simple concept. Unfortunately it is not simple when dealing with the concept of right and wrong because there are many separate and different ways to view morality. And as such murder at times is not always murder but could be defined as mercy. In the case of a 12 year old child name Tracy Latimer the concept of morality and murder become even murkier. Within this essay I am going to attempt to describe, evaluate and critically lay out both sides of morality in reference to this action of depraved murder verse mercy killing, of a handicapped child. Tracy Latimer was a 12 year old child who unfortunately was born with cerebral palsy. Because of her condition Tracy weighed just under 40 pounds, had the mentality of a three month old infant, and was subjected to countless surgeries. In 1993 Tracy’s father, Robert Latimer carried his daughter out of their house and placed her in the cab of his truck where he then proceeded to intentionally fill the cab of the truck with exhaust fumes until his daughter was dead. In lemans terms he poisoned his child with exposure to carbon monoxide. Viewing this from an ethical standpoint of morals, we now have to question if Mr. Latimer was morally justified for his actions or not. Was this a condonable mercy killing or was it cold blooded......

Words: 952 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


..." TER 1 Wat Is Morality. I \\·e are discussing nd-sm~ll matter, but how we ought to live. SOCRATES, AS REPORTED BY PLATO IN THE REPUBliC (CA. 390 B.C.) 1.1. The Problem of Definition Moral philosophy is the attempt to achieve a systematic under ­ standing of the nature of morality and what it requires of us­ in Socrates's words, of "how we ought to live,r and why. :It would be helpful, therefore, if we could begin with a simple, uncon­ !roversial defiuition of what lIJ,Qrality is. But that tums out to be impossible. There are many rival theories, each expounding a different conception of what it means to live morally, and any definition that goes beyoud Socrates's simple formulation is bound to offend one or another of them. This should make us cautious, but it need not paralyze us. In this chapter I will describe what I call the "minimum con ­ ception" of morality. As the name suggests, the minimum con ­ ception is a core that every moral theory should accept, at least as a starting point. We will begin by examining some recent moral controversies. The features of the minimum conception will emerge from our consideration of these examples. 1.2. An Infant with No Prospects: Baby Theresa Theresa Ann Campo Pearson, an anencephalic infant known to the public as "Baby Theresa," was bom in Florida in 1992. Anen ­ cephaly is amoll'g the worst cong~nital disorders. Anencephalic infants are sometimes referred to as "babies without brains," and . dlls......

Words: 4362 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay


...Physician-assisted suicide, the good death, mercy killing, dignified death. These are all names given to EUTHANSIA. But what is euthanasia? And why is it considered to be controversial? Although the definitions used in discussions of euthanasia and assisted suicide can vary, the following are based on Special Senate Committee reports on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Euthanasia is the deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person in order to relieve that person’s suffering.  Assisted suicide is the act of intentionally killing oneself with the assistance of another who provides the knowledge, means or both. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the act is done in accordance with the wishes of a competent individual or a valid advance directive.  Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when the act is done without knowledge of the wishes of a competent individual or with respect to an incompetent individual.  Involuntary euthanasia, which is indistinguishable from murder or manslaughter, occurs when the act is done against the wishes of a competent individual or a valid advance directive. When talking in terms of the person to die, a competent individual is capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the decision to be made and capable of communicating this decision.  An incompetent individual is not capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the decision to be made, and/or is not capable of communicating......

Words: 1624 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Illustration for Children: a Comparison of Two Artists

...Illustration for Children: A Comparison of Two Artists Adriana Martinez Lando University of North Texas Author Note This paper was prepared for SLIS 5420 Section 001, taught by Doctor Janet Hilbun. Illustration for Children: A Comparison of Two Artists “Never take yourself to seriously nor your work too lightly,” was Robert Lawson’s maxim for living (Wells, 2001, p. 43)! Robert Lawson was born on October 4, 1892 in New York City. He spent his childhood in Montclair, New Jersey. According to Folmsbee, Latimer, and Mahony (1947), “Robert Lawson as a child showed no special aptitude for drawing or writing. His life was that of the usual child in a usual suburban town” (p. 331). It was not until high school that he expressed an interest in art and drawing. He attended the New York School of Fine and Applied Art for three years. (Today it is Parsons School of Design.) He studied under the tutelage of Rae Sloan Bredin and Howard Giles. In 1914, Lawson opened up a studio in Greenwich Village. He worked there three years before his participation in the war. He worked on “magazine illustrations, stage settings, and some commercial work” (Folmsbee et al., 1947, p. 331). His career as an illustrator began during this time, when his illustration for a poem about the invasion of Belgium was published in Harper's Weekly. In 1917, Lawson went to France as a member of the first US Army camouflage unit, 40th Engineers. In France, he served with other well-known artists. ......

Words: 1957 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Benzodiazepines Effects on Anxiety

...Savannah Latimer Due Aug 8 Benzodiazepines Effects on Anxiety Benzodiazepines are classified as a family of depressant drugs and that means they slow down the activity and excitability of the central nervous system (1). These drugs are often used to treat a variety of conditions, because they have a variety of effects on the individual using them. When a person takes this type of medication they will most likely feel sedation, a reduced state of anxiety, increased muscle relaxation, and they may also experience an induced state of sleep (1). The effects caused by this family of depressants causes them to be widely used treatment for anxiety (1). There are several different benzodiazepines out in the world today and are also one of the most widely prescribed types of drugs in the world (2). The most common ones prescribed for the treatment of anxiety are diazepam, which is Valium, and alprazolam, which is Xanax (2). Most benzodiazepines have slightly different properties, but they all have a very similar effect on the brain (2). Benzodiazepines work on the GABA receptors in the brain to produce their effects (3). They work as GABA agonists in the brain, and that means they have the same effect as the neurotransmitter GABA (3). The effect of GABA in the brain is to slow down brain activity and reduce brain excitability, so as a GABA agonist benzodiazepines mimic GABA and do the same things to the brain (3). This is why benzodiazepines are able to produce sedation,......

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...Part 1: Throughout the years, euthanasia has grown to be a subject of great moral interest to many when it comes to the right to die. Who has the right to decide when a life should be ended? When should an individual have the choice in determining their final day or days? Is it right to help another kill themselves? These are just a few of many unanswered questions based on justification of morality. Although many offer their opinions and beliefs to these types of questions, the fact still stands that many disagree on the matter of euthanasia being morally right. With this thought in mind, John Hardwig’s article, “Is There a Duty to Die?” (178-88) sheds a little light to these questions. For instance, “Hardwig argues there is a duty to die that goes beyond refusing life-prolonging treatment,” and “In some cases this duty may require one to end one’s life, even in the absence of any terminal illness, and even if one would prefer to live” (178). I totally disagree with these beliefs of Hardwig. After reading all the readings, I found myself in disgust with Hardwig’s article the most because of my Christian beliefs. I believe that God has our days numbered and only He should have the right to decide when we should die. God gave life to us so why should we have the right to take it or participate in taking another’s? Although Hardwig creates a strong case for the duty to die, I view things a lot differently than he does. First, John Hardwig’s, “Is There a Duty to Die...

Words: 1419 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...REPORTSTO | HIREDATE | Leverling | Janet | 3 | Sales Representative | Kirkland | WA | 2 | 14-AUG-05 | Davolio | Nancy | 1 | Sales Representative | Seattle | WA | 2 | 13-SEP-05 | Fuller | Andrew | 2 | Vice President, Sales | Tacoma | WA |   | 27-DEC-05 | Peacock | Margaret | 4 | Sales Representative | Redmond | WA | 2 | 15-SEP-06 | Suyama | Michael | 6 | Sales Representative | London |   | 5 | 01-MAR-07 | Buchanan | Steven | 5 | Sales Manager | London |   | 2 | 01-MAR-07 | King | Robert | 7 | Sales Representative | London |   | 5 | 17-MAY-07 | Callahan | Laura | 8 | Inside Sales Coordinator | Seattle | WA | 2 | 20-MAY-07 | Dodsworth | Anne | 9 | Sales Representative | London |   | 5 | 29-MAR-08 | 2. COMPANYNAME | CONTACTNAME | COUNTRY | Refrescos Americanas LTDA | Carlos Diaz | Brazil | Ma Maison | Jean-Guy Lauzon | Canada | Forêts dérables | Chantal Goulet | Canada | New England Seafood Cannery | Robb Merchant | USA | Grandma Kellys Homestead | Regina Murphy | USA | New Orleans Cajun......

Words: 1099 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Criminal Law

...not willing to move. | R v Miller [1983] (HL) | Coincidence of MR/AR | When D creates a dangerous Situation, they have a duty to act- failure to act amounts to AR (MR= recklessness). | R v Church [1966] (CA) | Coincidence of MR/AR | D will be liable for murder if entire incident can be viewed as a ‘series of events’ designed to cause GBH/ Murder. MR/AR will be established when they occur at some point during single transaction. | R v White [1910] | ‘But for’ test, Factual Causation | Not factual cause of death if mother would have died ‘but for’ D’s actions. | R v Pagett (1983) (CA) | Legal Causation, Multiple causes | D’s act need not be the sole or main cause, only a cause that ‘contributed significantly’ to the result. | R v Roberts (1972) (CA) | Intervening acts, victim’s reaction | The chain of causation will only be broken if the victim’s reactions were ‘so daft’ as to be unforeseeable. | R v Blaue [1975] (CA) | The ‘Thin Skull’ rule | Held the ‘thin skull’ rule also applies to individual psychological make up and beliefs, not just physical conditions. | R v Pittwood (1902) | Duty to act, Contract | A person under contract will be liable for harmful consequences of his failure to perform contractual obligations. | Gibbins v Proctor [1919] | Actus reus, omissions- duty of care | A voluntary assumption of care is imposed on individuals who provide care and then cease to. | Mens Rea | R v Nedrick | Mens rea, Oblique Intention | Developed the ‘virtual......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Renaissance and Reformation: Ahead to the Past

...Chapter 4. Renaissance and Reformation: Ahead to the Past The fifteenth century saw a number of events that began to change the Medieval worldview. 1) from Wyclif at the end of the 14th century came an emphasis on individuals understanding the Bible for themselves rather than through priests, and in English rather than Latin; 2) the fall of Constantinople led to Greek classical texts being read and translated in Western Europe. Some of these texts conflicted with the scholastic philosophy based on the limited ancient texts (mainly Aristotle) previously available. A particularly important one was the work of Sextus Empiricus, who was a skeptic. Another important text discovered at this time was On the Nature of Things by Lucretius which advocated a mechanistic universe. 3) the invention of printing led to the rapid dissemination of new ideas; 4) the discovery of the Americas led to the further discovery of information difficult to reconcile with Aristotle. Maps before Columbus look like this: Twenty-five years after the map above was printed we see the Waldseemuller map: . A whole new continent is added! Worse, in 1572 a new star appeared in the sky. Tycho Brahe’s careful observations showed that it was beyond the moon (Gingerich). According to Medieval Aristotelianism the celestial regions (beyond the moon) were......

Words: 3122 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay


...Rodriguez v. Attorney General of B.C. In the case of Rodriguez v. Attorney general of B.C, many controversial philosophical and moral issues were challenged. Sue Rodriguez was diagnosed with ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease), a condition affecting motor neurons of brain and spinal cord. Her prognosis was a short life expectancy that had the prospect of a slow and painful death, and eventual complete paralysis, while remaining mentally competent throughout the process. Therefore, Sue requested the right to participate in voluntary euthanasia to have the option to end her own life with dignity. The law in Canada prohibits physician assisted suicide, so she challenged the law in court. However, the British Columbian court ruled in majority against Rodriguez. Rodriguez then appealed the court’s decision to the Supreme Court of British Columbia but the court had dismissed her appeal to participate in voluntary euthanasia with one dissenting judge and forwarded it to the parliament. The final decision made by the parliament was brought before the supreme court of Canada, which resulted in a 5-4 majority decision in favor of the current law that criminalized physician assisted suicide. Sue Rodriguez case embodies a serious ethical dilemma. It raised many philosophical and moral issues; this essay will analyze the various issues that justify the Supreme Court of Canada’s majority decision verses the dissenting judges. The key arguments that......

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Sin in Faustus

...Marlowe's "Doctor Faustus" and "Sin against the Holy Ghost" Author(s): Gerard H. Cox, III Source: Huntington Library Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Feb., 1973), pp. 119-137 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: Accessed: 07/11/2010 15:38 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access...

Words: 8485 - Pages: 34

Free Essay

Justification by Faith

...Justification by Faith By Russell D. Stalvey Introduction A statement that is ancient but also timeless and just as relevant for today’s believers is that we are justified by faith. The Apostle Paul gave insight to this statement very distinctly and in great aspect but to completely understand the statement, we first must possess a foundational comprehension of what it means to be justified. In understanding justification we will see that it is inseparably interrelated to faith, but not just any faith. We will also see that the undertaking of justification by faith has overwhelming effects on the justified. Definition Justification is seen as an act of God’s wonderful grace, free grace that is available to all sinners. God exonerations all of the sins, receives the sinners, not because of anything fashioned in the sinner or performed by the sinner, but only for the unflawed submission and complete satisfaction of the Lord, through God’s impartation and received by faith alone. The Westminster Larger Catechism answers the definition of justification in this manner: “Justification is an ‘act’. It is a courtroom verdict .We are the defendants and charges have been filed against us. The judge passes his verdict. Logically there are only two verdicts available to the judge. One of these verdicts is ‘condemned’, and the other is ‘justified’. If we are ‘condemned’, then the judge has pronounced us ‘guilty’. If we are ‘justified’, then the judge has pronounced......

Words: 2907 - Pages: 12