Free Essay

Traditional Fallacy

In: English and Literature

Submitted By zeeshanbabar
Words 1018
Pages 5
Zeeshan Babar
7 July, 2015 First Victimized, Now Victimizing History tells us about how hundreds of years ago all men and women except for the one with power were oppressed by emperors and kings. They were allowed to do only what the emperor allowed them to do, and he could make them do whatever he wanted them to de. Even the one with power in the empire were not allowed to deny or disagree with the emperor, or else they would suffer the same fate as every one else. However with time people revolted and revolution came after decades breaking this tradition of monarchy, and making every individual free with their rights. Now every individual is said to be a free human who has natural rights. But even in these modernized societies after all that human race has experienced, and has been through the fallacy of appeal to tradition still exists. Appeal to tradition is the fallacy that a standpoint, situation or action is right, proper, and correct simply because it has “always” been that way, because people have “always” thought that way, or because it continues to serve one particular group very well. It is the notion that if an idea has been around for a while than it should be followed and is true. This fallacy is one of the major reasons that have been recognized for the oppression of women all around the world. This is particularly the matter in less developed and modernized societies. The women of these societies are oppressed as they are not supported by their families for education, instead they are against it. They do not think it is necessary for a women to be educated, because according to the tradition women are obliged to support their families and raise children. Basically there duty is to perform well inside a household , and have nothing to do about what happens outside the house. This is a traditional fallacy, because a woman is not obliged to do anything anyone else thinks she should. They are also human beings like others, and have natural rights. But people still follow this tradition as going against it would be disrespectful to their ancestors or simply disrespectful towards men. Other reasons people follow this tradition is because following it makes their life easier and more pleasing. Some even follow this fallacy for the reason that they think the natural flow will be disrupted if this natural tradition is altered. Many women have stood against this fallacy, and some have been even supported by some men which has resulted some changes in some places. Some Decades ago you would not find any female in a western side university, however that has changed, and now in the western areas like the United States and in Europe universities are filled with females. But this change is still to take place in a lot of other nations, and societies. These traditional fallacies have cost a lot to women of different societies as many of these traditions lead women to be seen with lesser equality, respect, and a being close to slave for men.
In different tribes of Africa, different traditions are followed by people which are very disturbing.
There a tradition in a tribe in Africa that if the husband of a women dies, she has to sleep with his brother in order to lay the spirit of the deceased to rest no matter what circumstances. Afterwards the women have to go without washing herself for 40 days, and she would have little food as according to the tradition the food she receives will be only given by the family of the deceased. The food they get depends on the goodwill of the husband’s family. This is another form of traditional fallacy which is humiliation of the female race. These traditional fallacies have made women to have little value in society, making them targets of bad treatment, and physical abuse. ( MAILA) . Another tradition that came to light with financial crisis in Africa was that raping someone bounds you and the women to get married. Because men for marriage could not afford to provide a dowry for up to 1000$, they resorted to sexual violence. According to tribal customs, a man who rapes a virgin must then marry her, and does not have to pay a dowry in order to do so as someone who has lost her virginity loses the right to demand for that. (Maila) These absurd traditional fallacies is also a reason for many women who kill themselves in the middle east and Africa. This fallacy has only cost women pain and cruelty. When ever people are questioned about why this is happening, they would have only one answer that this is there cultural tradition. Not following these traditions or going against them is a big taboo for those people, and they can not even imagine stopping it by themselves. Instead they get frustrated if someone talks about how this is a fallacy which has to stop. Even though men fought and lost their lives for freedom, equality, and to get rid from the evil Emperors and Kings, they have corrupted themselves following these traditional fallacies which leaves them no different than those rulers. They might have freed themselves from the rules of unfair kings and authorities, but they have yet to free the curse that has been there in our societies forever. This curse is the evil which is oppressing are women leading to their sad lives and suicides. People now think that the world has modernized and prospered way more than before but in my opinion there is no point of this prosperity if everyone can not even live the way they want to. This fallacy should and has to be stopped or there would be more victims, and a sad history for the upcoming generation to read.

Work Cited
MAILA, HERTIER. "War, Tradition Feeds Sexual Violence Against Women." Institute for War and Peace Reporting. 9 Oct. 2009. Web. 8 July 2015. <>.

Similar Documents

Free Essay


...Fallacy Summaries with Examples Name: Institution: Fallacy Summaries with Examples Appeal to Authority The fallacy of appeal to authority also referred to as the Fallacious Appeal to Authority, irrelevant Authority or Ad Vercundiam takes the following form, the first person is claimed to be an authority on subject S and hence makes a claim C about subject S hence making C true. The fallacy is mostly committed when the individual in question is not a lawful authority on the subject. This implies that if an individual A does not merit making reliable claims on a subject B, the argument becomes fallacious. The reasoning becomes fallacious when the individual under focus is not necessarily an expert hence the given cases makes the reasoning flawed since there is no justification for the claim since an unauthorized person made the claim. In the event that a person falls prey to the fallacy, then it implies that the individual is accepting a claim as being true in the absence of adequate evidence to do so. Additionally, the individual accepting the claim does so erroneously on belief that the individual making the claim is an expert which implies that the claim is reasonable to accept. Example 1 An argument about the morality of abortion Individual A: I strongly believe in abortion as being morally acceptable simply because a woman aught to have a right over her own body. Individual B: I strongly disagree....

Words: 1757 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Parental Gender Roles

...I will disprove this argument by stating that there is not only insufficient evidence to support this claim but also there is a logical fallacy within the argument. I will finish this paper with main arguments that support my opposition that parental gender roles are unnecessary. The first opposing argument suggest that by Christian faith, parents must abide by gender roles set in...

Words: 2142 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Critical Thinking

...From Lecture & Handouts: 
 A. Know the steps in Halpern's framework for critical thinking. Reviewed below. 
 B. Know the names of the eight activities (each has an alternate term, but just need to know the main ones on the picture), and be able to match up descriptions of these activities with the correct name. SEE YOUR HANDOUT. 
 C. Know the steps in the paramedic method, and be prepared to apply them to a problem sentence. Steps given below. 
 Diana Halpern's (1996) Framework for Critical Thinking 
 Definition: Critical thinking is the use of cognitive skills or strategies that increase the probability of a good outcome. CT is purposeful, reasoned, and goal-directed. 
 Answer the following questions: 
 1. What is the goal? 
 First step in improving thinking is to be clear about the goal or goals. Sometimes there are multiple goals; sometimes the goal changes as we work on a problem. If the overall goal is not OPERATIONAL (i.e., "get a good grade" or "reach a good decision"), then identify operational goals (write clearly, address all elements of the assignment, evaluate the consequences of alternative decisions). 
 2. What is known? 
 Review what is known. You may know more than you realize, once you start taking a census. You may also realize that some of the apparently information is not certain at all. If you are completing an assignment or solving a problem for someone else, review guidelines for the assignment and ask yourself what the person cares about......

Words: 1484 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...We'll study the types of support you can use to substantiate your thesis, and look at some of the common logical fallacies, in order to avoid them in your writing. Who was THALES? Was a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher from Miletus in Asia Minor and one of the Seven Sages of Greece. What separated Thales from others? Empedocles Compare Logos versus mythos: The Greek words from which our English words “logical” and “mythical” have been derived, logos and mythos. Both Greek words can be translated as something like “story” or “account”. Mythical thinking and logical thinking both...

Words: 2781 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay


...The Stakeholder Model Unlike the traditional economic model that focused on the main goal of profit making, the Stakeholder theory focuses on more values and ways to make the stakeholders comfortable in the business. A business has more than the three employer,employee,supplier as stakeholders .The stakeholder model thus looks to balance out all these stakeholders in order to reduce any conflict that may arise from the all-inclusive environment. It is important for any company to recognize its social obligation in society in order to abide and custom its operations in the same line. Figure 5.23 presents the different dimensions of social aspect of community such as pollution, health care to employees among other societal obligations. In order to measure a company’s social and environmental performance, the triple bottom- line accounting caters for these aspects. The author refers to a mining company in Indonesia that uses triple line accounting that enables it control its mining activites, ensuring that the locals are not affected by their activities through controlled activities. Patagonia is another example that focuses on the sustainability of their operations through the stakeholder model. The approach used by Patagonia dismisses...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Rhetorical Analysis of Charles Murray

...Rhetorical Analysis Are too many people going to college? This question has been contemplated over for years. The increased cost of college throughout the years has caused the question to become even more relevant. Charles Murray, an author from the American Enterprise Institute, wrote the essay entitled “Are Too Many People Going to College?” Murray’s essay sought ought to explain that universities are being filled with students who are either not prepared for higher education or who are compelled into attending college and are unable to succeed because the lack of inherent abilities. While Murray makes many pertinent points about America’s infatuation with the B.A as a standard into a class of intellectual elite the essay does not take into consideration the individual influences that may lead to a student’s success. This essay will analyze and critique Murray’s view of why the pursuit of a B.A can lead to more harm than good. Murray’s main argument throughout his essay is that the perceived reward of a college degree disseminates to those seeking higher education and inevitably does more harm than good. He argues that many students do not have the ability to enjoy and finish a four year degree. This leads the student to being stigmatized and in debt due to his or her failure. Murray further establishes his argument by saying that more people continue to go to college because they are programmed into believing, regardless of their abilities, to pursue college as an......

Words: 1299 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Boolean vs. Aristotelian Essay

...While the traditional views are used in application for certain ideas, the modern view, credited to George Boole, is different in one key notion that changes the way categorical propositions can be analyzed. The modern Boolean standpoint differs from the traditional Aristotelian standpoint in its treatment of existential import. These two views impact the square of opposition and what inferences can be made from categorical propositions. A categorical proposition makes an assertion or a claim about a subject class or category in relation to another class. There are two terms within a proposition, a subject term and a predicate term. There are four standard forms of categorical propositions given the letter names A, E, I, and O. In the A form, all members of the subject class (S) are included in the predicate class (P): all S are P. In the E form, all member of S are excluded from P: no S are P. These forms A and E are universal propositions because they include all of the subject class. The forms I and O are particular propositions because they only include at least one of the subject class. In the I form, some members of S are included in P: some S are P. In the O form, some members of S are excluded from P: some S are not P. Aristotle introduced “the doctrine of the square of opposition” in the 4th century BC (Luzeaux, Dominique, et al). The four different forms of propositions make up the corners of both the modern and traditional squares of opposition....

Words: 1647 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Cybernetic Defense of Type Physicalism

...A Cybernetic Defense of Type Physicalism Abstract In this paper, I examine the tenability of type physicalism within the context of a second-order cybernetic analysis of phenomenality. I begin by describing the philosophical problem type physicalism attempts to resolve and follow up with an examination of arguments against type physicalism. I then describe how arguments against type physicalism tend to rely on the ontological distinction between system and observer. Next, I show that this distinction is purely conceptual and dissolves when phenomenality is analyzed from a second-order cybernetic perspective. Within this context, type physicalism remains a tenable solution to the mind-body problem so long as an isomorphic mapping between physical and psychological processes is possible. Introduction The motivation for type physicalism stems from empirical evidence of pervasive and systematic psychoneural correlations, that is, correlations between mental phenomena and brain processes. These correlations are systematic enough to allow scientists to successfully sense, transmit, analyze, and apply the language of neurons using an assortment of sophisticated imaging techniques and brain-computer interfaces. For instance, in 2003, Dr. Miguel Nicolelis, associate professor of neurobiology at the Duke University Medical Center, used a brain-computer interface system to successfully filter and utilize motor command impulses from the electrical activity of a primate brain to......

Words: 4023 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Critical Thinking Analysis of Penn-Mart's Health Care Strategy

...A Critical Thinking Analysis of Penn-Mart’s Health Care Strategy Revisions Dennis D. Puskas University of Maryland University College DMBA 610 September 21, 2014 Abstract The following paper will use a set of 10 critical thinking steps recommended by Browne & Keeley to objectively analyze the memorandum sent by Salvador Monella who is the Senior Vice President of Human Resources to the Board of Directors at Penn-Mart. Mr. Monella has conducted a review of Penn-Mart’s healthcare strategy involving a number of issues including cost to the company and employee involvement, to name a few. The purpose of the review, findings, discussion and recommendations will all be analyzed using critical thinking skills in an objective manner. As discussed in Browne & Keeley, the three dimensions of critical thinking will be used identify the best decisions available. Each of the 10 critical thinking steps and questions will be thoroughly explored and examined in a logical and systematic approach (Browne & Keeley, 2012). The final goal of the following analysis is to provide the reader with concrete examples of how to view the Penn-Mart business memo regarding their healthcare strategies. Question 1: What are the Issue and Conclusion? The issue and conclusion can be found both implicitly and explicitly in the last sentence of the memo contained within the “Purpose” section. Mr. Monella states that after their internal review of the matter at hand, he recommends......

Words: 1835 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Critical Thinking Notes

...Consider Notes Chapter 2 * WE need to set aside our passion in order to think clearly, to think critically, to make wise decisions. * How do we know the difference between noun and verb words like read and read? Understanding the context is necessary in critical thinking. * We need discernment. The path to discernment is through critical thinking. * Being able to critically think and intelligently challenge incorrect thinking is essential in making wise decisions. What is Critical Thinking? * Definition: A self-guided, self-disciplined process which directs individuals to think correctly about themselves and the world around them. It is an essential method that guides its adherents (someone who supports a particular party, person, or set of ideas) towards truth. It involves investigation, analysis and self-corrective decision-making which provide a consistent and coherent (of an argument, theory, or policy) logical and consistent) way to solve a problem and conclusion. * It is through the process of questioning what you see, hear, and experience that you can come to a conclusion to make a wise decision * Point of this book is to challenge you to “know what you believe” and “why you believe it” not to make you a skeptical question everything weird-o. * Hebrews 4:12 - “For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and...

Words: 3855 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Essay 1

...MDIA2002: Views Journalism Notes 3 Question and analysis tasks are to be found inserted at several points in the following notes. Again, this work is compulsory and must be submitted to Moodle at least 24 hours in advance of your tutorial. When providing answers, ensure that you use full, grammatical and well-expressed sentences. Ensure you bring along a copy of your answers with you to the tutorial. The final task in this week’s work may be quite time consuming, and possibly quite challenging. Rest assured that the tute preparation load will be significantly lighter once we get to tutorial 5 (or soon after that if you are in a smaller tutorial group) and the tutorial presentations. Until then it’s necessary to do a bit of front loading, so to speak, to get you up and running with the text analysis methodologies which will stand you in good stead later in the semester. Once you have mastered these methodologies there will be significantly less theory and much more of an emphasis on actual journalistic coverage of events, people, issues and trends. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A guide to analysing views journalism Part 1 – characterising arguments by reference to the how they are justified and supported In the first section of these notes we are going to look in a bit more detail at how supporting argumentation (justifications) works to justify primary claims. This material was dealt with......

Words: 7920 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Rebuttal on Gay Marraige Editorial Article

...It was traditional for women to be the possession of men, for men to marry...

Words: 556 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Statistical Modeling

...1 Motivating GLMMs I briefly summarize the motivations for GLMMs (in linguistic modeling): • The Language-as-fixed-effect-fallacy (Clark 1973 following Coleman 1964). If you want to make state- ments about a population but you are presenting a study of a fixed sample of items, then you cannot legitimately treat the items as a fixed effect (regardless of whether the identity of the item is a factor in the model or not) unless they are the whole population. – Extension: Your sample of items should be a random sample from the population about which claims are to be made. (Often, in practice, there are sampling biases, as Bresnan has discussed for linguistics in some of her recent work. This can invalidate any results.) • Ignoring the random effect (as is traditional in psycholinguistics) is wrong. Because the often significant correlation between data coming from one speaker or experimental item is not modeled, the standard error estimates, and hence significances are invalid. Any conclusion may only be true of your random sample of items, and not of another random sample. • Modeling random effects as fixed effects is not only conceptually wrong, but often makes it impossible to derive conclusions about fixed effects because (without regularization) unlimited variation can be attributed to a subject or item....

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Old Wine in New Bottles

...The mortise-and-tenon technique is able to attract wide interest using social networking service though it’s only a hard-to-find item in a niche market, as in the case of many traditional crafts. However, the biggest problem is that “wood...

Words: 434 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Phi-210 Final Paper- Fact or Fiction

...When looking at the one stereotype politicians is the ad hominem fallacy. The ad hominem fallacy is “the confusion between the qualities of the person making a claim and the qualities in the claim itself” (Moore & Parker, pg 173). Politicians are thought of as self-serving, hypocritical and dishonest con-artist. During a political campaign we see on the news how one attacks their opponents.   The personal attack ad hominem fallacy is attacking another with negative comment.   During campaigning it is bad because of the personal attacks on each other in order to discredit the other person.   This is how they want to get voters on their side to vote for them.   Politicians are a very unique group of people to explore stereotyping because they are probably the only group who uses stereotyping against each other, lease of which is positive (Green, 2009 ). In many ways, politicians create their own stereotype by announcing on national TV that their opponent possess every negative stereotype given to...

Words: 1583 - Pages: 7