Premium Essay

Logical Reasoning

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By nikangnikang
Words 189930
Pages 760
updated: April 26, 2016

Logical Reasoning
Bradley H. Dowden

Philosophy Department
California State University Sacramento
Sacramento, CA 95819 USA




© 2011-14 by Bradley H. Dowden

This book Logical Reasoning by Bradley H. Dowden is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. That is, you are free to share, copy, distribute, store, and transmit all or any part of the work under the following conditions: (1) Attribution You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author, namely by citing his name, the book title, and the relevant page numbers
(but not in any way that suggests that the book Logical Reasoning or its author endorse you or your use of the work). (2) Noncommercial You may not use this work for commercial purposes (for example, by inserting passages into a book that is sold to students). (3) No Derivative Works You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. An earlier version of the book was published by Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont,
California USA in 1993 with ISBN number 0-534-17688-7. When Wadsworth decided no longer to print the book, they returned their publishing rights to the original author, Bradley Dowden. The current version has been significantly revised. If you would like to suggest changes to the text, the author would appreciate your writing to him at


Comments on the earlier 1993 edition, published by Wadsworth Publishing Company, which is owned by Cengage Learning:
"There is a great deal of coherence. The chapters build on one another. The organization is sound and the author does a superior job of presenting the structure of arguments. "
David M. Adams, California State Polytechnic University

"These examples work quite well. Their diversity, literacy,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Logical Reasoning

...501 CHALLENGING LOGIC AND REASONING PROBLEMS 501 CHALLENGING LOGIC AND REASONING PROBLEMS 2nd Edition ® NEW YORK Copyright © 2005 LearningExpress, LLC. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by LearningExpress, LLC, New York. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: 501 challenging logic & reasoning problems. p. cm.—(LearningExpress skill builders practice) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-57685-534-1 1. Logic—Problems, exercises, etc. 2. Reasoning—Problems, exercises, etc. 3. Critical thinking—Problems, exercises, etc. I. LearningExpress (Organization) II. Title: 501 challenging logic and reasoning problems. III. Series. BC108.A15 2006 160'.76—dc22 2005057953 Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Second Edition ISBN 1-57685-534-1 For information or to place an order, contact LearningExpress at: 55 Broadway 8th Floor New York, NY 10006 Or visit us at: Contents INTRODUCTION QUESTIONS ANSWERS vii 1 99 v Introduction his book—which can be used alone, with other logic and reasoning texts of your choice, or in combination with LearningExpress’s Reasoning Skills Success in 20 Minutes a Day—will give you practice dealing with the types of multiple-choice questions that appear on standardized tests assessing logic, reasoning, judgment, and critical thinking. It is designed to be used by individuals working on......

Words: 45646 - Pages: 183

Free Essay

Why Do Some Individuals Consider Tax Deferred to Be Taxes Saved? Is Their Reasoning Logical?

...Aku its final exam question …….it’s like take home exam where we will get 24 hours to write this questions and submit it tomorrow morning at 9 a.m …… so please help me to write this questions which you find very easy or familiar….it would be very grateful if aku could write and post me today evening around 4 or 5 p.m because I have to frame it in my English standard as you will have very high standard….soo….plz make spare few hours for this and post me the answers na aku…….. These are the questions…….? Question 1 Why do some individuals consider tax deferred to be taxes saved? Is their reasoning logical? (4 marks) Question 2 Mr. Karma is an employee of XYZ ltd. He draws salary @Nu.20,000 p.m during the year 2010-2011. He occupies residential house at Thimphu. Its rent is Nu.6000 p.m. He is offered three alternatives by the employer: 1) The company pays the rent direct to the landlord, the tenancy being between the company and the landlord. 2) The company pays house rent allowance to karma @Nu.5750 p.m and karma pays rent of Nu.6000 p.m to the landlord-the tenancy being between karma and the landlord. 3) The company neither offers karma the house accommodation, nor the rent allowance. Karma pays rent of Nu.6000 p.m for the accommodation occupied by him. He requests you to advise him as to which option would minimize his tax liabilities and maximize the cash inflow after tax. (5 marks) Question 3 Governments around the......

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mental Health

...uring the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. Often, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are confused. It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to the University of California. The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories. "In deductive inference, we hold a theory and based on it we make a prediction of its consequences. That is, we predict what the observations should be if the theory were correct.  We go from the general — the theory — to the specific — the observations," said Dr. Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. uring the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. Often, deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are confused. It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or......

Words: 1107 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...10/15/13 Search Of Cubes and Matchsticks - Logical Reasoning Tricks for CAT 2011 : PaGaLGuY News & Channels Home News Forums Mocks Apps Advertisements Login Of Cubes and Matchsticks - Logical Reasoning Tricks for CAT 2011 by Ravi Handa in MBA Entrance Hacks • 29 September '11 nick password Remember me • Login Forgot password? New to PaGaLGuY? First Name Last Name E-Mail Address Sign Up Advertisements Sponsored Users IMI.NewDelhi 131 Posts • Follow misbpgpb 151 Posts • Follow (Photo credit: Orin Zebest) If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic. Tweedledee in Lewis Carolls Through the Looking Glass. If the above line confused you, trust me you are not alone. Even God can vanish in a puff of logic. To know how, you can probably jump to the end of this post. To those who choose not to skip let us discuss a few common types of Logical Reasoning problems. Type 1: Cube problems A cube is given with an edge of unit N. It is painted on all faces. It is cut into smaller cubes of edge of unit n. How many cubes will have x faces painted? In these types of questions, the first thing that we need to figure out is the number of smaller cubes. For this, we look at one particular edge of the big cube and figure out how many smaller cubes can fit into this. It will be N/n. So, the number of smaller cubes will be (N/n)3 A cube has 6 faces and none of the smaller cubes......

Words: 1783 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Physics Essay

...Pure Logic vs. Scientific Logic “Reasoning is an art, and reasoning about the natural world is the art that lies at the base of science” (Castel and Sismondo 55). Pure logic is “a form of reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity” (Oxford Dictionaries). In contrast, scientific logic is a form of reasoning in which a logical thought process is used to conduct experiments and research in order to reach a valid conclusion. Altogether, pure and scientific logic are different forms of reasoning used to solve everyday problems in life; yet, it is ‘scientific logic’ that is more prevalent in solving everyday problems, including critical interpretations of major problems on earth. Scientific logic is the best choice to cope with life problems in the midst of global issues; it helps facilitate our logical expertise in daily matters; it is both predictable and reliable; and on a greater scale, scientific logic helps us deal with the widespread problems on earth. With the growth of science and new emerging technologies, life is becoming more complicated, therefore relying purely on logic is insufficient. “Most of the time very little follows logically from what we know, and when we think that it does we learn that most of our knowledge consists of generalizations that don’t hold 100 percent of the time” (Castel and Sismondo 71). People live in a world of probability and because “scientific reasoning develops over time,” (Castel and Sismondo 74)......

Words: 1673 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...of Logical Reasoning The Logical Reasoning Section The focus of this book is on the Logical Reasoning section of the LSAT, and each Logical Reasoning section contains a total of 24 to 26 questions. Since you have thirty-five minutes to complete the section, you have an average of approximately one minute and twenty-five seconds to complete each question. Of course, the amount of time you spend on each question will vary with the difficulty of each question and the total number of questions per section. For virtually all students the time constraint is a major obstacle, and as we progress through this book we will discuss time management techniques as well as time-saving techniques that you can employ within the section. The Section Directions Each Logical Reasoning section is prefaced by the following directions: “The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by commonsense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. After you have chosen the best answer, blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.” On average, you have 1 minute and 25 seconds to complete each question. Because these directions precede every Logical Reasoning......

Words: 175039 - Pages: 701

Premium Essay

Deductive Reasoning

...Deductive reasoning is one of the two basic forms of valid reasoning. It begins with a general hypothesis or known fact and creates a specific conclusion from that generalization. This is the opposite of inductive reasoning, which involves creating broad generalizations from specific observations. The basic idea of deductive reasoning is that if something is true of a class of things in general, this truth applies to all members of that class. One of the keys for sound deductive reasoning, then, is to be able to properly identify members of the class, because incorrect categorizations will result in unsound conclusions. For deductive reasoning to be sound, the original hypothesis or generalization also must be correct. A logical deduction can be made from any generalization, even if it is not true. If the generalization is wrong, though, the specific conclusion can be logical and valid but still can be incorrect.One can better understand deductive reasoning by looking at examples. A generalization might be something such as, "All wasps have stingers." The logical conclusion of a specific instance would then be, "That is a wasp, so it has a stinger." This is a valid deduction. The truth of the deduction, however, depends on whether the observed insect is, indeed, a wasp. People often use deductive reasoning without even knowing it. For example, a parent might say to a child, "Be careful of that wasp — it might sting you." The parent says this because he or she knows that......

Words: 265 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Gmat Cr

...Powerscore CR Bible Notes: Chapter 2: The Basics of Critical Reasoning -Read the information in the given order. Read the stimulus first, then question stem and then the answer choices. Why? Sometimes reading a question stem first undermines a student’s ability to fully comprehend the stimulus especially on tougher questions. It often leads to time waste because students read the stem first then the stimulus and then back to the stem. Leads to confusions or distractions because sometimes the question stem refers to information in the stimulus which may throw you off. Stimuli with two questions will once again lead to time waste because you are not re-reading one question but two questions this time! Reading the stimulus sometimes enable readers to predict the question stem. For example, “Resolve the Paradox” type of CR questions usually contain an obvious paradox or discrepancy. However, when you read the question stem first, you are not gaining or saving time in anyway. Premises give the reasons why a conclusion should be accepted. Always ask yourself “What info is the author using to convince me? Why should I believe this argument or what is the evidence behind this conclusion?” Premise Indicators: because, since, for, for example, for the reason that, in that, given that, as indicated by, due to, owing to, this can be seen from, we know this by. Conclusion Indicators: thus, therefore, hence, consequently, as a result, so, accordingly, clearly, must...

Words: 3164 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Logical Fallacies in Philosophy

...What Are Logical Fallacies? Unknown AIU Online What Are Logical Fallacies? There are two different kinds of reasoning in philosophy. One uses the logical synthesis of two or more true statements, it is called deductive reasoning. The other generalizes by observing a number of specific examples, it is called inductive reasoning. (Carroll, 2000) Both deductive and inductive reasoning requires us to use sound logic to reach valid conclusions. Without the use of this logic errors can occur, which in philosophy are called logical fallacies. Mere Assertion The first logical fallacy I am going to define is mere assertion. This is an argument of opinion. There is no guarantee that what you say will be expected. But all opinions whether they are believed to be true or not must be supported by evidence. Here is an example of a mere assertion fallacy. My cats love me because they sleep on my bed. Also when I open their cat food they come running, so they must love me. Both of these statements are not supported by evidence. They are just statements of opinion that I believe to be truth. Circular Reasoning The second logical fallacy I am going to define is circular reasoning. This is an argument where your conclusion and premise are the same. It is an argument that asks you to simply accept the conclusion without real evidence. Also it can be an argument that simply ignores an important assumption. So to avoid this fallacy you......

Words: 1313 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Thinking and Decsion Making

...Decision Making In today’s society thinking styles and decision making are numerous and a decision- maker must have the skill set of thinking clearly and applying them to arrive at an equitable decision that is right for the purpose intended. Diverse people think differently and as such different ways in coming to a decision. However, thinking styles are as different as are people and as such there many different ways to think and come to the decisions. Thinking styles are many, but three styles that will be written about are: creative, logical, and scientific, these methods are commonly used at arriving to a decision, whether in personal or in business situations. Individuals approach various methods of thinking in ways that are somewhat inherent to their teaching or the skills that have been reinforced in formal schooling or other setting. This paper will examine similarities and differences between the three thinking styles such as creative, logical and scientific. By learning more about these thinking styles one will be able to learn more about the differences so that a workforce or an individual can be better equipped to analyze situations and make decisions. Creative Thinking To stimulate curiosity and promote divergence, clever business people think creatively. Creative thinking involves creatively generating something new or original then critically evaluating it (American Scientific Association, n.d.). Generating creative thought is the fun part but evaluating it......

Words: 1372 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

How Can a Researcher Benefit from Using Both Inductive and Deductive Logical Thought?

...different from validity? Which term implies the other? 10/3.33 Reliability refers to consistency in measurement, while validity means precision in measuring exactly what one intends to measure. Validity implies reliability. How does inductive logical thought differ from deductive logical thought? How can a researcher benefit from using both kinds of thinking? 17 Inductive logical thought is reasoning that transforms specific observations into general theory. Deductive logical thought is reasoning that transforms general theory into specific hypotheses suitable for testing. The strengths of inductive logical thought lies in establishing probability and being flexible by providing direction to evaluate competing hypotheses, even when information incompatible with the known causes or hypotheses is observed. On the other hand, deductive logical thought has the advantages of certainty and objectivity. Theories developed using induction can be tested using deduction. If a theory is complex, induction can result in valid hypotheses in less time than if formed through deduction. Inductive logical thought is reasoning that transforms specific observations into general theory (6/3). Deductive logical thought is reasoning that transforms general theory into specific hypotheses suitable for testing (8/4). T...

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Thinking and Decision-Making

...people break down to find solutions to problems and issues. Normally, in the workplace, one will find that diverse thinking styles exist for complex situations more often than in daily life. Three styles of thinking in the discussion below are creative, persuasive, and logical thinking (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007). Logical Thinking Thinking logically is a skill that the American workforce consistently uses to bring about an end to issues. Logical thinking comes from two forms of reasoning called deductive and inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning observes situations and forms conclusions but does not ensure certainty (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007). Deductive reasoning accepts premises and settles on logical conclusions based on evidence from the premise (Kirby & Goodpaster, 2007). This reasoning takes place in the human mind because it is taught from the formal rules of logic, and is popular thinking among critical thinkers. According to the Journal of Healthcare Management, “Individuals can implement several strategies to improve their strategic thinking ability, including deliberately incorporating the requisite experiences into their development plans, ensuring the required characteristics of reasoning, and recognizing that it is a key leadership requirement,” (Goldman, Cahill, & Filho, p. 403, 2009). Creative Thinking Creative thinking is using creativity to turn something old new again. This can be accomplished by taking the old and mixing it, moving it,......

Words: 1127 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Career Activtity Reason and Apptitude Summary

...Career Plan Activity- Reasoning Aptitude Discussion Monica Bridgewater Wilson BCOM/275 May 27, 2013 Ray Hernandez Career Plan Activity- Reasoning Aptitude Discussion Reasoning skills can be defined as one’s ability to make a sound and logical decision. It is the process of getting from the problem or task, to a solution, and getting there by reason.  It is using ones common sense and basing your solutions and decisions on viable information, evidence or logical conclusions rather than ones emotion. These skills include the ability to think critically. The purpose of the assessment was to assist in getting a full understanding of one’s unique thinking style and how it can be used in attaining your career goals. The Results The results of my assessment revealed that I am focused and work well in careers where success comes from using practical skills and where thinking my is mainly logical and practical, focused on facts and the bottom line, and provides organization and follow through. It further explained that my strengths lie in adhering to values, following instructions, strategizing, innovating, Organizing, and delivering results. Thinking Style and approach to Arguments The assessment taught me that reasoning skills is necessary for effective conflict management, picking ones battles and resolving issues  in the best way possible, (logical and from common sense.)  Once one has learnt about ones reasoning skills they become more aware of the strengths and......

Words: 527 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Slice of Life

...five different main branches. The study of the correct thinking, valid reasoning and arguments are focused by logic. The study of reality beyond physical means deals with metaphysics. Epistemology investigates the structure of a certain knowledge and its validity. The study of perception of art and beauty are focused by aesthetics. Finally the study of acts from a moral perspective which is ethics. However, there are subjects as cosmology, theodicy, rational psychology, social philosophy, and philosophy of man are the sub-branches of philosophy. Logic and critical thinking are important topics on studying other branches of philosophy, having knowledge with these helps on decision-making, analyzing issues and argument. Logic is derived from the word logos which means study, reason, or discourse (Cruz, 1995, p .6). It is a main part of philosophy which practices reasoning and necessary on studying other branches. The two classifications of logic are logical and illogical thinking. Logical involves understanding in order, where logicians prefer a well-organized and consistent analysis, while illogical is the exact opposite which defines as random and inconsistent thinking. Logic involves analysis, comparison, classification, definition, logical division and the most primary objective which is inference. Inference is an organized way of constructing a claim which conclusion is supported by premise in a logical sense. For example, “Every cat is an animal, Deb is a cat. Therefore,......

Words: 2734 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Thinking Decison Making Process

... Thinking and Decision Making Logical Thinking Everyone is born with the ability to reason, even on a primary level. Logical thinking is a process in solving problems that requires reasoning. The word logic is from ancient Greek. Logic is a science that studies the principles of correct reasoning. There are two types of logical reasoning induction and deduction. Inductive reasoning is also known as inductive logic is the process of reasoning for specific evidence, observation, or experimentation. Inductive reasoning individuals do every day in his or her lives. Deductive thinking is also known as deductive logic the process of reasoning based on common knowledge. A logical thinker needs to recognize illogical thinking. Critical thinkers will ask questions to determine if the issue is logical or illogical for instance; do the pieces fit together logically? Are you really sure this makes sense? Are you certain it is in the publication? It is imperative the questions that are asked needs to be specific and precise to the situation or issue. If there is any inconsistences exist when finish asking the questions it is more likely the thinking path is illogical. It is important for logical thinkers to follow the facts for creditability to the situation or issue. In another words “When the combined thoughts are mutually supporting and make sense in combination, the thinking is logical” (Paul & Elder, 2006, p. 95). It is clear logical thinking is the foundation to......

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5