Free Essay

Team Debate

In:

Submitted By bishop5611
Words 759
Pages 4
The city of Wichita has an important decision to make. This decision is vital to each and every person living in or around Wichita. It will affect many people and will adversely affect their health in many ways. Many people have been to a convenience store and purchased a bottle of water, or a restaurant where they ordered a glass of water but few people ever consider what’s in the water. If a customer were to order a glass of water at a restaurant they would expect a glass of clean unadulterated water. For example when you order a glass of tea, several questions are going to follow. “Sweet or Unsweet?”, “Would you like a lemon in your tea”. Almost each and every drink ordered at a restaurant would have a few basic questions with the exception of water. There is not a single question or modification that can or should be made to water. However, what if the waiter asked you, “Do you want some chemical in your water?” Many people would be shocked or even confused on how or what to answer. Still you have another group of people that would firmly say no, and those people may even wonder if they chose the right establishment to patronize. This is the decision that the city of Wichita is pondering. This decision is to decide whether or not to add the chemical, fluoride to the water supply.
Fluoride is usually found naturally in low concentration in drinking water and foods. The concentration in seawater averages 1.3 parts per million (ppm). Fresh water supplies generally contain between 0.01–0.3 ppm, whereas the ocean contains between 1.2 and 1.5 ppm. In some locations, the fresh water contains dangerously high levels of fluoride, leading to serious health problems. (Wikipedia, 2012) Now if some location of the world have dangerously high levels of fluoride then it would be safe to say that fluoride in abundance is dangerous. This statement would then lead to the question, “Why would this be a hard decision at all?”
The level of fluoride in the water should be left to nature itself. There are two genuine reasons why adding fluoride to the water is ridiculous. The first reason is water fluoridation is a form of mass medication. All humans need water to survive and therefore all humans living off of the Wichita water supply would have to give consent. This decision cannot be a majority decision but must be a unanimous decision. There is no guarantee that water suppliers can accurately control the levels of fluoride that individuals receive and thus cannot monitor their response. (Wikipedia, 2012) For example the proponents of water fluoridation argue that it is better for the overall dental health of the population. There has been no firm evidence that a population with fluoride in the water has better dental health than a population without. Also as stated previously it is a fact that a high level of fluoride in the water can be dangerous. This fact also raises the question of what about certain types of people and professions that consume more water than an average person. These examples would include athletes, hard labor workers and infants who drink nearly twice the amount of water than that of an average person. In the United Kingdom one political party refers to fluoride as a poison. The political party also claims that water fluoridation violates Article 35 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, is banned by the UK poisons act of 1972. The most important reason for a water supply not to be fluoridated is that it is unethical to force a medication onto people. Fluoridation of water has not shown reduction of the incidence of cavities. However, Topical fluoride in toothpaste and mouthwash has been shown to work. Simply put the fact remains that ingestion of fluoride has not shown result so improved dental health.
The second reason that fluoridation of water should not be performed is that the medication will be administered to all people that drink water regardless of age, health or vulnerability. In November 2006, the American Dental Association advised parents to avoid giving fluoridated water to babies. (Chow, 2008) Fluoride also has been defined as a neurotoxin, and it may also affect the intelligence of the child. Increased studies have shown the possibility of fluoride to all affect hormonal systems and endocrine systems. These studies also determined that fluoride can have an impact on the IQ of children who are still developing.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Learning Team Debate Paper

...Learning Team Debate Paper BCOM/275 February 11, 2013 Should parents be held responsible for their minor children’s criminal behavior? In this paper, Learning Team C will be discussing "Should parents be held responsible for their minor children's criminal behavior?" Parents should not be held any more accountable for the crimes of their children than children should be held responsible for the crimes of their parents. It does not make any sense to discipline one for the misconducts of the other. Nurturing is not a strict skill. Youngsters are not made of robots. Therefore, there is no particular method or outline for raising one’s children, who will promise that the child will develop up to be an accomplished resident that is a benefit to the public. For one artless purpose people who also include children have a free will. Children are less likely to participate in criminal crimes. If they have a productive parent at home taking care of him or her. What children need at home is love, affection, comfort, and positive reenactment. Parents can do any and everything correctly but if the child is rebellion it is nothing the parents can do. Parents can seek outside help to help for their rebellious child. Most children act out because of the way they were raise up, or the people they associate with. Most children who associate him or her with rebellious children tend to act out as his or her surroundings do. Children not held accountable for their actions will...

Words: 1900 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Team Debate on Legalizing Marijuana

...Everyone will have their own ideas and beliefs as to whether alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana are even close to comparison with each other. Moderate use of marijuana is now worse than alcohol or tobacco. Leslie Iversen, PhD, states, “Cannabis is a safer drug than aspirin and can be used long-term without serious side effects (Iversen, PhD, 2012). Drinking and driving kill people everyday but there is not much heard about driving high. Impairment from smoking marijuana is different than alcohol impairment. This is not saying that people should drive high, because the effects of impairment are still very detrimental. Yes it will be harder to detect someone driving high versus alcohol breath tests. The law would be able to organize special tests though for judging people’s impairment. If marijuana were to be legalized publicly then crime rates may actually decrease instead of increase because people will not be so easy to commit theft for getting the drug. Judgment is not the same when a person is high but the judgment and reaction to someone drunk can be even worse with some people. Studies and groups like to discuss how marijuana is a gateway drug. The problem with this theory is with how the tests are conducted. Just because someone uses marijuana today does not mean they will be using cocaine tomorrow. Smoking a cigarette, drinking a beer, and smoking marijuana are fairly similar when one would start speaking of health risks. The difference in them being though...

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Competitive Debating

...skills. It is about assembling and organizing effective arguments, persuading and entertaining an audience, and using the language to convince people that your arguments outweigh your opposition's. Debating is not about personal abuses, irrational attacks or purely emotional appeals. A debate usually involves two sides talking about a topic (often called a motion). As a competition, teams of debaters attempt to show the adjudicators that they have the best debating skills. Being the best debater does not mean that the debater's opinion has to coincide with that of the adjudicators. After attending this course and the course on specific debating formats, it is expected that the trainee would be able to conduct their first competitive debate properly. Understanding Formats To ensure proper conduct of the debates in a competitive setting, competitions usually enforce what is called a format. In collegiate level competitive debating, these formats are usually based on the debates conducted in a parliament, such as Australian Parliamentary, British Parliamentary, and Asian Parliamentary. Aspects regulated by a format include: • number of teams in each debate; • number of debaters in each team; • duration of speeches • order of speeches; • roles of speakers (what is expected from each speaker); • allowance/prohibition of interjections/interruptions; • issues on making a definition of the motion; • procedure, criteria, and marking scale for adjudication. Explanation...

Words: 5815 - Pages: 24

Free Essay

Group Debate

...Group Debate Analysis Paper Rachel Hammond August 29, 2015 COM 275 Lorelle Davies   A formal school debate, the advantages are many. The student gets to improve his or her speaking skills. They get to learn to use words that are more technical, but are not considered jargon. They have learn how to use proper grammar, or else their adjudicators will criticize them. Debaters learn how to expand the points they have to fit a specific period. Another important advantage of a debate is that they learn how to think outside the box. In a debate, failure to anticipate what the opposition's points will be is a sign of narrow mindedness. You must always have better, unanticipated by the opposition rebuttals, and debate helps develop this. In British Parliament format, there are two teams within a house, and the closing team will have to provide 'new light' to the opening team's government. Providing "new light" on a subject is easier said than done, because the opening goes first, and they will have all easy arguments and closing would have to think of something better. Debaters who think critically will successfully rebut the opposition's points. Debating helps students become creative when it comes to making points for frequently debated topics. The debate also teaches students how to research better, as they need this to make points and arguments. Debating also enhances teamwork and friendly competition. Debating teaches students how to act under pressure and how to...

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Learning Team Debate Paper

...Should Marijuana be Legalized? BCOM/275 November 26, 2012 Should marijuana be legalized? Throughout the years, the topic should marijuana be legalized is often heavily debated.  For many years the use of marijuana was forbidden and outlawed in the United States, but in more recent years marijuana seems to be becoming accepted. Scientist has found many useful applications for marijuana. Recently, here in the United States, many states have approved legislation for marijuana for medical purposes. Most recently, two states Colorado and Washington have passed referendums that will allow people over the age of 21 recreational use of marijuana without the penalty of a criminal offense. These two states will oversee the use of marijuana for its constituents similar to how alcohol is controlled. Whereas, the government at the state level in Colorado and Washington is in favor for the legalization and passed legislation for the legalization of marijuana, the federal government has not. This causes legal, moral, and ethical issues and begs that questions; should marijuana be legalized? Pros of Legalization One benefit of the legalization of marijuana would be the ability for state and local governments to tax the legal production and sale of it. Currently, because marijuana is illegal the sale of it is not taxed so the local, state, and federal governments do not reap any of the benefits of this “$10.5 billion dollar industry” (Miron, 2005, p.4). In a report written by Jeffrey A....

Words: 2543 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Al; Kshdf

...Debate Summary Amanda Missick, Karla Castillo, Kimberly Archuleta, and Kimberly Arzate BCOM 275 April 2, 2015 John Kungis Debate Summary Throughout the debate we chose to discuss the Chris Kyle murder case where Eddie Routh was convicted for the brutal murder of Chris Kyle, former Navy Seal, and his comrade Chad Littlefield. As the debate summary we decided to go with the pro side of the argument, which includes; Eddie Routh's history of mental disorders, how he fled the scene, and the sentence given to him for his murder charge. Not only did this topic make us have different opinions amongst each other, but made us open our minds to different views. Even though as a team we had our disagreements and different believes on the topic, we came together for the final decision of the debate. We believed that the murder trial of Chris Kyle was justly sentenced. Even though Eddie was facing a low point in his life we believe his alcohol abuse, violent behavior and strange conduct were contributing factors that led to his mental state. Living in a city with one of the biggest military bases in the country, we all in different ways are related to military personnel. Some of us personally know veterans with PTSD. It was discussed during our meetings that it normally takes more than a shooting range to trigger someone to relive those experiences that only veterans have experienced. We are devastated that this incident turned out the way it did, ending the life of not only the...

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Doc a Chance to Chg My Lonely World

...________________________________________ Basic Debating Skills. ________________________________________ • What is a debate ? • What is a topic ? • The Definition • The Team Line • The Roles of the Speakers • What is Matter ? • What is Manner ? • What is Method ? • Rebuttal • The Marking Scheme ________________________________________ A Debate A debate is, basically, an argument. That is not to say that it is an undisciplined shouting match between parties that passionately believe in a particular point of view. In fact the opposite is true. Debating has strict rules of conduct and quite sophisticated arguing techniques and you will often be in a position where you will have to argue the opposite of what you believe in. Concept: The Topic If a debate is a form of argument then it logically follows that there must be something to argue about. This is called the TOPIC. The topic changes from debate to debate. They are often about current issues of public importance ("This House Would Abolish UPSR and PMR"). All topics begin with the word "That". As in other arguments there are two sides to any topic. The team that agrees with the topic is called the GOVERNMENT and the team that disagrees with the topic is called the OPPOSITION. Concept: Definition If a debate is going to take place then it must be agreed in advance what the debate is going to be about. Thus it must be agreed what the topic means. This may seem obvious in a topic like "That UPSR and PMR Should...

Words: 514 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Business

...------------------------------------------------- MGMT 363 - Debate 1 Total Marks: 12 points Grade Weight: 3% Introduction: The purpose of this debate is to enable learners to gain knowledge in the areas of business ethics and social responsibility while reinforcing their skills in business communication, team-building, and interpersonal influence. In-class debates allow participants to analyze opposing points of view in order to conclude where viewpoints diverge and why. Recommended debate topics and position statements are outlined below. Your instructor will use a random system to specify both the debate topic and the position (Point and Counterpoint). All group members are expected to participate in the research, development, and presentation of the debate position. Each participating member will receive the same group grade. However, if it is clear that all group members did not participate equally, an individual’s grade may be lower than the group grade. Debate Topics and Position Statements (Point and Counterpoint) Topic 1. A considerable amount of production in Canada is shipped to other countries. Further, Canadian businesses are diversifying their customer base by expanding beyond the Canadian border. As well, trade agreements are common place between Canadian and foreign business owners. Finally, Canada is a country with a culturally diverse workforce. Therefore, should all Canadians be required to, at a minimum, speak fluently...

Words: 867 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Commucational and Interpersonal Skills

...nearly as many forms as there are life situations. In the business world, there are sales presentations, informational and motivational presentations, first encounters, interviews, briefings, status reports, image-building, and of course, the inevitable training sessions. • Example:- o A presentation given by a sales person about his/her product about to launch. o A presentation given in some meeting to explain the matter under discussion. o A presentation given by students in colleges/universities which is usually a part of their projects.  BRIEFING:- A conference before a major event to announce/agree upon the major information and actions necessary to complete the mission. • Example:- o Briefing given by coach or captain of a team before the starting of some game. o Briefing given by commander or head before some military operation. o Briefing given by a teacher to students before the start of some competition.  INSTRUCTIONS:- Differentiated instruction (sometimes referred to as differentiated learning) involves providing students with different avenues to acquiring content; to processing, constructing, or making sense of ideas; and to developing teaching materials so that all students...

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Senior Debate Reflection

...speaking was my senior debate. I still remember walking into room 204, trying to contain my nervous laughter. My body was shaking as my mind was busy imagining myself messing up the entire debate. Our debate topic was on, when felons are released from prison should they get their rights back? My partner and I were on the opposing team. A lot of research went into and was needed for this topic, we looked up, read, studied, and broke down all the information we found regarding our topic. Anything that could help us back up what we were trying to prove. My weakest point through all of this was preparing for speaking in front of the class. My teacher, Ms. Sowers assigned us to write...

Words: 739 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Writing an Argument

...2012 Jennifer Mims Writing an Argument Learning Team C debated the credibility of an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia. There has been a debate in recent years about the credibility of the encyclopedia. This paper will research the four steps to fairly presenting an argument, and how there four steps relate to the Wikipedia debate. Present Both Sides of an Argument The first step to writing an argument is to present both sides of the argument. A one-sided presentation will make you appear to be either biased or sloppy in your research. If the sources are available and if their views are pertinent, they should be represented and, if you wish, refuted in your essay (Spatt, 2011). The base of Learning Team C’s argument on the credibility is how the information is added to the online encyclopedia. Wikipedia allows users of the website to add information to the topics covered on the website. Members of the team felt that is discredited information found on the website. Once the information is added to the website, Wikipedia has a panel of personnel that verifies all information added. Other members of the team felt that because this system is in place, it credits the information. Provide an Account of the Argument Wikipedia is a source of information that is not credible in the eyes of the University of Phoenix. Members of the team felt that this discredited the source of information. One interesting point was made is a team member had a University of Phoenix instructor that...

Words: 692 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Socio Cognitive Perspective

...The Benefits of Debate Why Supporting High School Debate is a Worthwhile Project The core of competitive high school debate is to examine every side of important and controversial issues in an atmosphere of reasoned argument and respectful discourse. The enormous effort that students put forth to succeed in this intellectually exciting activity is truly inspiring. They devote a huge number of hours to research, discussion, case writing, and practicing for competitions. They spend countless evenings and weekends at tournaments competing for their schools and teammates. The benefits they accrue as a result of all their hard work are numerous. Here are just a few: Rigorous and Critical Thinking Perhaps the most important skill debaters learn is the ability to think rigorously and critically. A number of studies have reported that participation in debate increasing the critical thinking of debate students.1 Debate participation promotes problem solving and innovative thinking, and helps students to build links between words and ideas that make concepts more meaningful.2 Debate students are taught to synthesize wide bodies of complex information, and to exercise creativity and implement different ways of knowing.3 Learning to think well has far reaching effects into every aspect of a student’s life. Academic Skills Many studies show marked improvement in a wide variety of academic skills as a result of participation in competitive debate. Debate students excel in written...

Words: 1327 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Npda Concept

...NPDA DEBATE The most interesting concept I learned about NPDA debate is the concept of the counter case and the role the two contending teams play in the debate. The debate has two rival teams who discuss their arguments and ideas about the resolution. The concept of the counter case is a central part in the NPDA debate where the proposition team affirms the motion presented to the debaters, and the opposition team, which opposes the resolution and/or the case, brought out by the proposition team. In other words,the NPDA debate is made up of two competing teams who represent two different sides of an issue. The proposing team defends the motion, presented to the debaters laying out the facts it has supporting the motion and providing an argument that validates the motion. Consequently, the opposing team can then make good use of the concept of the counter case. This is where the opposing team refutes or challenges the resolution while at the same time expressing their views that disagree with the proposition teams plan and idea (Rainbolt, & Dwyer, 2011). The opposing team debates on the issue differently and challenges the propositions suggestion. The opposition team responds to the proponent’s statements and puts into consideration the other side of the debate trying to sound more persuasive and reasonable. The counter argument presented by the opposing team thus provides reasonable doubt to the proposition team’s opinion. The proposition team on the other hand has to...

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Great Debaters Analysis

...After watching The Great Debaters based on a true story which was inspired in 1935 by Mr. Melvin B. Tolson. The Great Debaters is a very powerful movie, not only thru the words and speeches that were given but thru the context and storyline of history the movie allocated. Public speakers have the ability to change the world and others aspect on the world itself with the key essentials such as being credible to what they are supporting, stating official facts and showing interest and being dedicated to the change they hope to see in society. The Great Debaters portrayed each essential with certainty. Samantha Hall, Henry Lowe, and James Farmer Jr. all presented exceptional debating skills and superb speeches in which Mr. Tolson instilled into...

Words: 318 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Debate

... “I love argument, I love debate. I don't expect anyone just to sit there and agree with me, that's not their job.” -ate coring "Present your case," says the Lord. "Bring forth your strong reasons," says the King of Jacob. Isaiah 41:21 What is debate? A debate is a contest, or, perhaps, like a game, where two or more speakers present their arguments intent on persuading one another. Men have been debating with one another since the beginning of time when the serpent first debated with Eve the benefits of eating certain fruits in the Garden. We shall limit ourselves here with discussing formal contest debating between educational institutions, or, in the world of homeschooling, between families that choose to bypass educational institutions and educate their children at home. Debate "Present your case," says the Lord. "Bring forth your strong reasons," says the King of Jacob. Isaiah 41:21 What is debate? A debate is a contest, or, perhaps, like a game, where two or more speakers present their arguments intent on persuading one another. Men have been debating with one another since the beginning of time when the serpent first debated with Eve the benefits of eating certain fruits in the Garden. We shall limit ourselves here with discussing formal contest debating between educational institutions, or, in the world of homeschooling, between families that choose to bypass educational institutions and educate their children at home. Why debate? "He [the student debater]...

Words: 4171 - Pages: 17